Sarah Jessica Parker has ‘no regrets’ about treatment of SATC ladies

29621457

Sarah Jessica Parker is the cover girl for the June issue of American Marie Claire. However, SJP isn’t the only interview. The story (complete piece here) reads like a love letter to Sex and the City, and all four women are interviewed. Uncomfortably, all of their careers are dissected too, and Marie Claire makes it clear who they think the career victor is: SJP. They also spend too much time harping on and on about whether the ladies get along. Hint: they get along well enough to promote the hell out of the movie and cash their checks, so yeah, who cares? By the way, SJP and her “enormous regrets” about not spending time with her twin girls tells the magazine that she’s seen to “every detail, every atom” of the movie. Of course.

SJP on her rumored animosity with Kim Cattrall: “When you’re on set, you’re working 90-hour weeks, you’re never home, you’re exhausted. There are times when all of us have been sensitive, and sometimes feelings get hurt. But I don’t have any regrets about how I’ve treated people.”

Kim Cattrall on the same: “The chemistry among the four of us is very strong. [Why the rumors?] Because the press has to put women in these boxes, rather than show them as the movie portrays them: working together and being powerful. Things just have to be explosive for no other reason than for people’s imaginations.”

Kristin Davis on how everyone gets along: “There was a very strange piece in one of the tabloids that said Kim and I would eat in the restaurant of our hotel and not sit together, which cracks me up,” she says, actually cracking up. “When I would get back from the set, I would go to the gym and get room service. I’m not a put-on-decent-clothes-and-go-to-the-hotel-restaurant person, but Kim is. The story was that we don’t like each other. Ridiculous!”

Cynthia Nixon, truth-teller: “It hasn’t always been smooth sailing,” she says. “But the idea that we’re somehow adversarial is ludicrous.”

Cattrall on what SATC meant for her career: “Sex and the City came along to me when I was in my 40s and already established as an actress,” she says. “And I thought, Wow! I’ve done all of that, and now this on top of it!”

Cynthia Nixon on her memories: “It was a whirlwind, and I’m sure I don’t remember one-tenth of what happened.”

Ugh. This is an actual line in the article: “But it’s Parker who has ridden the SATC wave to icon status, eclipsing her peers by a landslide.”

Cynthia Nixon on SJP: “We go to the theater together, or just go to one of our houses for dinner,” says Nixon. She and Parker have summer homes in neighboring towns, and their sons, who are the same age, are regular playmates.

Kristin Davis on the friendships: “When we first started, we would all drive out to the Hamptons together at 4 a.m. on a Friday night after shooting ended and see the sunrise as we arrived. I love those memories. We worked so many hours, just work work work work work. We were all so committed to making the show good. There wasn’t room for much else. I had my dog, and that was about it.”

Cattrall on the work schedule: “Nineteen-hour workdays are stressful, whether you’re driving a truck, working in a coal mine, or on a set and trying to be your brightest at 4 o’clock in the morning. But there’s a camaraderie that happened through all of that.”

Davis on aging and criticism: “When the last film opened, one critic began her story by discussing our faces! It was traumatizing. But that also gets at the amazing part. We didn’t start on this show when we were 20. Everyone knows how old we are, and we’re still getting to make movies.”

Will there be third SATC film? Nixon says maybe: “If Sarah Jessica and [writer/director] Michael Patrick [King] want to make another, I’m there. I’d go along with them blindfolded.”

SJP on Carrie’s style: “I’ve never revealed as much or been so daring or made quite as many triumphant mistakes as Carrie. But I’m now bolder than I would have been had I never played this part.”

[From Marie Claire]

Here’s the thing – I would totally be down with this film and any other films they wanted to make if only they would make the films more like the television show! You know, with jokes, and an actual plot that moved quickly, and some semblance of character development and genuine human emotion. Instead, I fear that this film will be just like the first one – a series of fashion shows, interspersed with hour-long Carrie-centric pity parties, with a dash of whining from Charlotte and a dash of hardcore emasculating bitch from Miranda. Oh, and camels. Let’s not forget the camels. I hate what they’ve done to a television show I once loved.

kimc

kdavis

cnixon

Individual photos courtesy of Marie Claire online. Cover courtesy of The Fashion Spot.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

25 Responses to “Sarah Jessica Parker has ‘no regrets’ about treatment of SATC ladies”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. LondonLady says:

    With you on the last comment. Movie felt so stunted, like these characters were in the process of getting a very slow dust and brush off after five years hiatus. The point for the producers to take on board from tusfans, is that we don’t care if Carrie et Al go to the Moon let alone AD- 90 minutes set in New York on the old SATC sets would be just as good if not better. Also, since everyone now knows the film was shot over in Morocco, wouldn’t it have been better just to switch the location in the script?

  2. canadianchick says:

    Charlotte’s boobs look more normal than that other photochopped poster on CB the other day. I will watch it for brain candy and to support my glam geriatric gals, but I agree the films are nowhere near as well written as some of the series.

  3. Tash says:

    That airbrushing is fucking crazy.

  4. Snarf says:

    Photoshop-monsters.

  5. zippy says:

    holy photoshop!
    SJP must bow down to whoever invented that program.

  6. lucy2 says:

    On the show, I thought all 4 women were equals. In the movie, it was all over-dramatic Carrie nonsense, and it felt like half the movie was an excuse for her to spin around in ridiculous wedding dresses. So if SJP has “eclipsed” the other women, it’s because the movie was written that way (and badly).
    It sounds like they’re all trying to nicely step around the idea that they weren’t all BFFs during the whole thing. Which is OK, I agree that the media trying to pit them against each other is silly, and it doesn’t happen to male ensembles.

  7. Hautie says:

    Well at least SJP arms are not scary looking.

    I am constantly amazed how well she has looked here in the last month or so in print. Either she had a little work done or the tech with the photoshop skills is a miracle worker.

    SJP even has a current commercial for that skin care line she promotes and she looked like she did in 1995.

  8. A.K.A says:

    I don’t agree…I love the show, have it at home and it really makes me laugh but I also have the film that I watched again just yesterday and still I thought it was good. It was touching at times and funny at times. It had me laughing and even had me teared up at certain parts.The story was good.

    It’s a movie and I think needed to be done at a different pace and with a different ambiance than the tv show. If they had made a whole 2 hours just like 6 times the 20-minute tv show, it would have been way too much for a movie. IMO.

  9. bros says:

    thats that balmain dress demi wore in her w mag shoot, is it not? i guess whenever anyone puts that on, it is cue to the photoshop design team they must start working overtime.

  10. Crash2GO2 says:

    Oh look, she is in the same pose that Demi supposedly was in during that huge photoshop bruhaha. People are going to start wondering where her hip is. ROTFL!

  11. Taya says:

    Did SJP turn into a rich snob or has she always been that way? There is not one time that she regrets how she treated someone? She is just coming off like a typical phony celebrity in every interview. With her, “we don’t have nannies crap”, to the “I make all our food for my 3 kids from scratch from my organic garden that I planted in between hand making clothes for my twin girls who wear cloth diapers that I clean myself because I am just a regular mom who does everything all on my own”. Oh please! We see the nannies sweety. Just fess up and admit you have help. Do you think the public really believes that you and Matthew take care of twin newborns and a 7 year old all by yourselves?

    I loved SATC when it was on, but watching it now, I actually realized how much Carrie whines and whines and whines. Even in the movie. It was 2+ hours of Carrie crying because she is a rich successful elitist and the man who has dumped her ass numerous times, dumed her again. Been there, done that. There was no growth in the SATC movie, especially from Carrie and many of the male the actors seemed out of character.

  12. Jag says:

    Wow, I actually like something that SJP is wearing. lol The author of that article is off his/her rocker, though, if the thought is that SJP has eclipsed these other women. I really wish that all four would be featured, rather than just SJP for these things because she’s my least favorite character.

  13. bubbles says:

    too funny, those pictures. they are like paintings. bad paintings!

  14. JuiceinLA says:

    “I hate what they’ve done to a television show I once loved. ”

    Indeed, although for me the finale of the show was the beginning of the end. You can’t call yourself a strong vibrant sexually liberated woman if you flee for Paris because you don’t speak the language, the very moment the man who destroyed you waltzes back in.

    reuniting with your true love- ok. The way Carrie Bradshaw did it, undermines everything that show was supposed to represent.

  15. original kate says:

    i love the show, and most of my female (and gay male) friends do, too. why? it was just frothy, slightly naughty fun, revolving around fashion, cocktails, & sex. some of those sex problems hit home and my friends & i would just crack up. some of the writing was pretty snappy – we’re not talking shakespeare, or feminism 101, but it was just eye candy. also, it was filmed in one of my fave cities, NYC. in fact i always thought the city was the fifth “friend.” which is why the movie didn’t work, and why the new movie won’t work either. they should stay in NY and then we’ll talk.

  16. Ally says:

    DITTO! to your last comment.

    Michael Patrick King and SJP have turned the show into a cartoon. As she ages, instead of becoming wiser and cooler, Carrie is turning into Jessica Simpson.

    I’m a fan of the first 4-5 seasons of the show, but I don’t think I can bear to be trapped in a movie theater with this squealing, overacted, schmaltzy mess.

  17. Feebee says:

    So SJP is responsible for every atom of that monstrosity of a movie? I agree, it hardly resembles the tv series. Pretty much any HBO series amde into a movie shown be adult enough to garner an R rating.

  18. Annie says:

    F’ing who is that on the cover? SJPhoto-shopped-into-oblivion-hell? I bet she wishes her face looked like that instead of a beasty horse. Gawd all mighty!

  19. archiepelago says:

    I loved the last movie but I am not looking forward to the next one. Morocco? Camels? It seems so campy and while the show always had a little camp, it was NEW YORK that made it what it was. Seeing them in far flung places might throw me a little too far out of it. I never realized (until I started watching re runs) just how narscissistic and whiny Carrie is. Yech. (I can’t even be bothered spell checking narcs.is.ssis – oh forget it)

  20. mariex says:

    The only time the show was interesting is when you are drunk and pretend her character is a street walker. Then it makes perfect sense.

  21. KateNonymous says:

    “But it’s Parker who has ridden the SATC wave to icon status, eclipsing her peers by a landslide.”

    Wow, Marie Claire, why stop there? Surely you can mix some more metaphors into that mess of a sentence.

    @mariex (#21): Don’t forget the Atlantic City episode, in which I can’t see Carrie as anything other than “tiny little drag queen.” Seriously, she is wearing all of the eyeshadow on the East Coast in that episode.

    I enjoyed the show, although it definitely declined as it went on, and found the movie insufferable. I may catch the sequel when it gets to HBO, but I’m not paying theater prices for it!

  22. jover says:

    Please for the love of God, can we end photoshopping. I’m tired of SJP, can’t the fashion mags put an actual model on sometimes, and one that doesn’t need photoshopped. Someone needs to remind SJP that SATC is light fluff, not an eternal cultural icon like Shakespeare. She’s going to ride this fluff to her grave.

  23. Ruffian9 says:

    Photoshop gone wild…. like, completely out of control.

  24. coconut says:

    all the complaining from kaiser et al and the commenters about photoshopping is tiresome, as is all the hating about SJP and SATC.

    in our culture, in our media–photo shopping happens. unless a lot of us mount a campaign as a *group*, not as a bunch of individual blog whiners, nothing even has the potential to change it.

    if you don’t like her and the show, fine; do you have to go on and on about it every time she’s interviewed in a magazine? if you don’t like her that much, why don’t you boycott her?

    she and the show are what they are. they are successful. incredible as it may seem to many of you, some of us want to relive any moment of satc-ness possible, even it’s cornier, less “realistic” than the tv program was, and more about carrie than we would prefer.