'08
Of all “The Hills” girls, 22 year-old Audrina Partridge gets the least publicity and seems the most normal. Now she’s set for a little injection of mid-week fame with topless photos from her pre-Hills days.
Patridge’s rep gave TMZ her carefully worded all too perfect statement:
“I took these photos years ago when I was just out of high school and beginning to model. I was young and very trusting of others and I didn’t know to protect myself. It is a lesson learned, for myself, and hopefully for the young girls who look up to me.”
[From TMZ]
According to the photo description quoted on WWTDD, she took the pictures at 19 to send to Playboy, but they turned her down.
Earlier this month Patridge was rumored to be joining a performance of the burlesque troupe Pussycat Dolls, but said that she’s just going to introduce them and won’t grind it on stage like Paris Hilton did.
You know she leaked these photos herself, but it wasn’t a bad idea. She comes off looking like the sexy victim, and gets a lot of press in the bargain.
You can see the photos at WWTDD.
Audrina is shown at the DCMA Collective story opening on 3/14/08, thanks to PRPhotos.
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Audrina Patridge
10 Responses to “Audrina Patridge says she was “young, trusting” when nude pictures were taken”
-
Um, I thought I read somewhere that the guy who took these pictures was a friend of hers who warned her against taking the pictures in the first place. Very obvious leak, in my opinion.
-
She is really, really pretty. I bet Playboy wouldn’t turn her down now.
-
I have to call “Bull$h!t” on her claim. She tried to act like a sleaze and get a spread on Playboy? I wish she had the class to assume it. The excuse of “Naive at 19″ just doesn’t cut it for me.
-
it’s not sleazy to be in playboy prude. she’s hot. are her tits real?
-
Can’t wait for season 4 of The Hills to start on March 24th!!!!
-
..and you’re still a whore, Audrina.
-
Audrina is a very attractive girl, it’s sad that she stooped to this level to try to get her career going. I read on another blog that these pictures were meant to be artistic…I’m a photographer, and those photos aren’t anywhere close to being artistic nudes. They were intended for Playboy, so let’s just call a spade a spade.
-
I’ve never seen the Hills. I think she’s so beautiful, but at the same time, she’s majorly lacking something. There’s something about her that makes me wonder and cringe. Can’t figure out what it is. Since I don’t know anything about her personality, I can’t say that it’s that. I don’t even know if what I’m saying makes sense. I guess what I mean is, when I see her pictures, even though she has a beautiful face and a great body, I can see why Playboy rejected her. Does that make any sense?
-
Yeah tootle it kinda does! She reminds me of that “brooke” chick that was on the Real World and went craAzaZy! She screamed “Don’t you EVER…SPEAK to me…like THAT…AGAIN!!!!” It was scary! The soup always makes fun of her.
Anyway, there’s just something quirky about her face, but I kinda like it. I can see how others dont though. No upper lip. None!
margaux:
cc:
Toubrouk:
pen:
Sasha:
Scooter:
Tootle:
Leave a Reply
Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not.By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
meh…i looked at them. it could be way worse. i mean they were taken when she was a “model” so at least it’s somewhat professional…and it’s not some shitty polaroid of her in raunchy sex positions.
Report this comment as spam or abuse