Comments on: New Brangelina baby photos worth $10 million

By: sus

sus — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:42:12 +0000

they absolutly wood sell they have done that whit all the rest they are the first to put there kids on the marked i think thats sick they shoud just go away and stay away they meak me sick they are lyers whit a dobbel moral and media whores just diskustink

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lenny

Lenny — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:05:45 +0000

Seriously she looks like a rat in that cover picture. A very repulsive rat. I am glad she got better. I hope though her head grows smaller as she grows.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: iheartlasagne

iheartlasagne — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:19:23 +0000

John -

I noticed 3-4 Brangelina tabloid covers in the grocery line yesterday; even though they’ve not really been out and about, the tabs keep making up stories and recycling the same photos, oversaturating the whole thing. I imagine Brangelina would be perfectly happy not to see their pictures on the cover of every other mag, but I know you disagree.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Bex

Bex — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:15:22 +0000

Shiloh is so FREAKING CUTE! Aw!

But anyway.. I don’t think I’ve ever bought a People magazine. Ever. I like the baby pics, and at least in these guys case, most if not all the money will likely go to charity.. that part is ok. But I doubt the other celebs are doing that (which is lame) If magazines have that kind of money to burn, where’s the pressure for them to be doing more for charity and good causes? Seriously? Actors and whoever get bad reps, shouldn’t these, aparrently booming companies/mags/whatevers get a bad rap too?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lola

Lola — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:25:40 +0000

LOL, Shiloh’s mouth has always been open.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Tammy

Tammy — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:39:57 +0000

I’d rather see Angelina with it than JLO, at least Angelina is a humanitarian of sorts, but JLO made it obvious she lavishes herself with all the bragging and boasting she’s been doing ever since she admitted she was pregnant. $120,000 nurseries with gold plated furniture, lavish hospital room, $90,000 baby shower with Swavorski crystals, goodness, and her $6 million is not going to charity.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mia

Mia — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:22:23 +0000

@ paris herpes: LMAOOOOOO!

@ the “chicken fetus”

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: em

em — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:10:35 +0000

just because it goes to charities doesn’t mean that the money will be used to feed hungry bellies or other good thing.

i wouldn’t pay money to see a newborn that looks like worms. sorry.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Claire

Claire — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:00:03 +0000

I think they’ll give every penny to charity so why not go for it. That will feed a lot of empty little bellies for a while.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: paris herpes

paris herpes — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:28:55 +0000

The baby in the photo looks like a chicken fetus. What is it about these baby photos that celebs sell to mags for millions? Seems like celebs love to whore out their children. The bigger the celeb, the more money they get, the tackier the whole thing is…it’s really annoying and who cares about their kids anyway?

Report this comment as spam or abuse