Is Naomi Campbell lying her ass off at a war crimes tribunal?

100628m7_campbell_b-gr_01

Today, Naomi Campbell finally had to testify in open court at Charles Taylor’s war crimes tribunal at The Hague. Previously, Naomi Campbell had tried to get out of testifying, telling Oprah that she feared for her safety, and throwing a hissy fit when an ABC News team dared to ask her about potentially being a witness to Taylor’s possession of Liberian blood diamonds. It’s funny to think about this now, but this whole thing started because Mia Farrow “outed” Naomi as receiving blood diamonds in 1997 – Farrow even claimed that Naomi had “bragged” about receiving uncut diamonds from Charles Taylor when they were both at a dinner for Nelson Mandela. Naomi’s latest diva fit was to demand special concessions for her testimony at the tribunal – she didn’t want to be photographed entering or leaving the court, a right she was given, although oddly enough, her actual testimony was recorded live on a 30-minute delay:

Throughout her testimony, Naomi admits several pieces of information that she had heretofore out-right denied or flat-out lied about. On that night in 1997, Naomi says that she had been sleeping when “two men” knocked on her door and “and gave me a pouch and said: ‘A gift for you.’…I opened the pouch the next morning when I woke up… I saw a few stones in there, they were very small dirty-looking stones… The next morning at breakfast I told Ms [Mia] Farrow and [her former agent Carol White] what had happened and one of the two said ‘That’s obviously Charles Taylor’, and I said ‘I guess that was’.

Naomi denied that at the dinner for Mandela, she was seated next to Charles Taylor. Naomi claims that she was seated next to Mandela and Quincy Jones. This contradicts earlier testimony from Naomi’s ex-manager Carole White, who claimed that Naomi and Taylor were seated next to each other at the dinner, and that “Miss Campbell and Mr Taylor were mildly flirtatious with each other throughout the dinner.” Allegedly, Charles Taylor also told Naomi that he was going to send her some diamonds, and he made arrangements to send some men with the gift. Naomi denied this conversation happened as well.

Naomi then goes on to claim that she gave away the uncut diamonds! She says she gave them to Jeremy Ratcliffe, who ran the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund. Unfortunately for Naomi, Charles Taylor’s defense produced a letter from the Fund in which they claimed they had “never received a diamond or diamonds from Ms Campbell or from anyone else. It would have been improper and illegal to have done so.”

Also: when asked if she was nervous, Naomi replied: “No, well, I didn’t really want to be here. I was made to be here. So, obviously I’m just like wanting to get this over with and get on with my life. This is a big inconvenience for me.” She also said she was afraid of Charles Taylor because he was “someone I read on the internet has killed thousands of people, supposedly“.

So, what’s your verdict? I think Naomi is still lying her ass off about everything, and I love that the prosecution and even Taylor’s defense has her lies all laid out with contradictory testimony. Here’s what I think happened: Naomi and Taylor were sitting next to each other at least part of the dinner, and they struck up a conversation, and surprisingly, Naomi didn’t start beating him with a phone or a fork or anything. Instead, she smells money and so she was nice. Taylor was happy that a beautiful woman was being nice to him, so he devised a plan to give her a present – some lovely uncut diamonds that thousands of people had to die for. He sent his men to her room, Naomi took the diamonds and the next morning, she bragged about her gift to anyone who would listen. She kept them too – my guess is that she probably had them made into some piece of jewelry that she still has. Just my take. Oh, and Naomi is such a major C-U-Next-Tuesday for those quotes, “This is a big inconvenience for me” and “someone I read on the internet has killed thousands of people, supposedly.” This is a war crimes tribunal, not your hair dresser being late at a Marc Jacobs show.

Header: Naomi on June 28, 2010. Credit: Bauer-Griffin.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

61 Responses to “Is Naomi Campbell lying her ass off at a war crimes tribunal?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. RHONYC says:

    oh happy day!

    naomi done permanently jacked up her face with some jada pinkett specials…

    CHIPMUNK CHEEK IMPLANTS!!!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

    merry christmas to me.

    lol 🙂

  2. aenflex says:

    What a disgusting example of humanity. This woman is just angry and bitter and spoiled. Just proves that beauty doesn’t buy you a soul. I really despise this woman.

  3. Fluffy Kitten Tail says:

    And people bag on Britney’s busted weave.

  4. Anonymous says:

    ***someone I read on the internet has killed thousands of people, supposedly***

    SUPPOSEDLY? B$tch please!

    Oh, and “read on the internet”? If you are only know about Taylor’s deeds from reading about them on the internet, WTF were you doing at Mandela’s dinner? God, I despise her!

  5. buenavissta says:

    This woman has no conscience and an insane sense of self importance and priviledge. I wonder if she has considered the “inconvenience” to the families of all the people who died for her shiny things.

  6. snowball says:

    I’ve never figured out her appeal. She just looks so snotty all the time.

    Oh yeah, she’s lying. I doubt she thinks the little people’s rules are for her. She’s pretty much proven that time and again already. Why would she start now, when the goody bag had diamonds in it this time?

  7. Missfit says:

    I wonder how she’d like it if she were to be the one digging up those diamonds like those innocent helpless people. But ya, her testimony sounds off, all wrong and obviously, very selfish and self centered. She’s making all about her, pfft.

  8. Kaiser says:

    I think she’s done something to her face too! She’s all kinds of puffy.

    Also: this story upsets me so much. I want other people to be as mad at her as I am! She’s ridiculous, and her testimony is so narcissistic and horrible. She’s just a terrible person.

  9. Feebee says:

    Ha, you missed the quote when she said it’s not unusual for her to be given gifts at any time of the day or night.

    Bitch please!

    Words aren’t cannot adequately convey my contempt for this worthless self-absorbed creature.

  10. denise says:

    What a horrid excuse for a woman. She is heartless and cold. If only she were in front of me , I’ll throw my phone at her, or something much heavier.

  11. Si says:

    Get eyes for lies to look at the tape!

  12. Kazoo81 says:

    “they struck up a conversation, and surprisingly, Naomi didn’t start beating him with a phone or a fork or anything.”

    LMAO!

    sigh. i try to avoid hearing Naomi talk because she just ruins everything when she does. she’s so beautiful, and has one of the best runway walks EVER. she really should be seen and not heard.

  13. Meanchick says:

    Naomi is still the most hateful, spoiled, selfish b***h I’ve ever seen! I lost any respect I had for her long ago when she “supposedly” boned Mike Tyson. This chick can’t keep a man to save her life. She is money hungry for sure and I believe every word of MF’s claim. What does she have to gain by lying? She (Campbell) is no humanitarian. She could’ve refused the gift, but nooooooo!Loose lips sink ships NC! Just couldn’t keep your hole shut, huh?

  14. LolaBella says:

    Looks like her lies are going to catch up with her very soon. What happens to her if they can prove that she is lying? Can she be jailed for perjury at this tribunal?

    Also, can’t they subpoena photos and or video from Mandela’s dinner of that night? I am sure someone would have a pic/video that proves who Naomi was sitting next to.

    If you want to avoid a potential blood/conflict diamond, invest in simulated (lab created) diamonds and other gems. The ones that are being manufactured these days are practically indistinguishable from genuine stones.

  15. Green Is Good says:

    Awwwww! Poor Naomi is being inconvenienced. My God! I’m clutching my Pearls. How dare a pesky War Crimes Tribunal waste Princess Naomi’s precious time? Fun killers.

    What a self absorbed tw@t. Nobody else on the planet matters, or even exists in Naomiworld.

  16. Kittypants says:

    @aenflex – Completely agree. She’s an utterly repulsive individual.

  17. Meanchick says:

    And what’s with the hair loss?

  18. Meanchick says:

    Check out the way she’s holding the Bible. Like it’s burning her hand.

  19. Green Is Good says:

    @Meanchick: That hair loss is from years of bad weaves and hair extensions.

  20. bellaluna says:

    “This is a big inconvenience for me”?!? Are you f’ing kidding me? Oh, so sorry Ms. Campbell, that you accepted blood diamonds from a warlord responsible for horrific crimes against humanity, and then were called to testify against him. Shall we have some discretion, humility, and a conscience surgically implanted for you?

    Shallow much? BITCH!

    @ Kaiser – I am just as angry (and horrified) as you! This one is a rare breed of self-absorbed bitch!

  21. Green Is Good says:

    Naomi is in some deep shit now. I don’t know what legal repercussions there are, but this is reputation damaging stuff.

  22. TaylorB says:

    So she read on the internet that Charles Taylor is ‘supposedly’ be a bad guy? That is like saying was Hitler ‘supposedly’ anti-semetic.

    Not that I condone violence, but if anyone ever throws a phone at this waste of DNA I hope it is one of those giant ones from 1985.

  23. Pip says:

    She’s a peasant with money. And probably ill gotten money, by the looks of things. She’s an absolute disgrace. I agree with the question regarding a potential conviction for perjury in an international war crimes court. How fascinating it will be should they manage to prove that little nugget. Can’t wait for the Mia Farrow and Carol White testimonies. Either way her career should be over, for nothing more than trying to save her ass by implicating the Nelson Mandela Foundation for receiving these diamonds that were produced through bloody, suffering slavery. Repulsive, odious and facile witch.

  24. meme says:

    When does this insufferable bitch say this is all a big inconvenience for her? I simply cannot listen to 9 minutes of her and that other guy who talking sooooooooooooooooooooo slooooooooooooooooooowly.

  25. original kate says:

    what a twat.

  26. fugly says:

    that top is not very flattering on her. and, she scares me.

  27. DBK says:

    I can’t hate her. She’s so damn gorgeous.

  28. xxodettexx says:

    i think someone called her a twat earlier? yeah, ill go with: twatty liar!

  29. Gwen says:

    She is stunningly beautiful, and incredibly evil. If there was such a thing as karma, this bitch would be in jail, or in a work camp, or somewhere where people suffer without rest. It makes me hate the world seeing someone like her be so lucky in life.

  30. hatsumomo says:

    Whatever, I suppose I’m totally immune to outrage over Miss Campbell because face it, its what she is. She’ll always be that way till her dying day.

    And please remember people, the U.S. the is world’s largest consumer in diamonds. And the Kim process didn’t start until 2001, regulation on blood diamonds didn’t enact till 2003, so any of y’all ladies with big shiny stones on y’alls hands could very well be a blood diamond. Just so you know!

  31. Kate says:

    BALDIE-LOCKS!!! LOL

  32. hellen says:

    “I read on the internet…”

    Wait, what…? She can READ?! Now I know she’s lying. This woman is as dumb as a box of (fake) hair.

    Good on Mia Farrow for busting her. Too bad that did not involve a bejeweled phone.

  33. dread pirate cuervo says:

    If she’s gonna play stupid, why not just say she took them but didn’t know it was wrong?

  34. Jeri says:

    Soon her looks will match her disposition and everyone will see her as she actually is. Karma, Bitch.

  35. Juice in LA says:

    The unfortunate thing about each side being able to so easily discredit her, is that her testimony becomes worthless, and the murderer benefits.

  36. Lushus L. says:

    She’s starting to look like Peter Burns (Dead or Alive).

  37. Annie says:

    “What a disgusting example of humanity. This woman is just angry and bitter and spoiled. Just proves that beauty doesn’t buy you a soul. I really despise this woman.”

    Irony much?

  38. Persistent Cat says:

    Someone asked what she was doing at a Mendela dinner. What the hell was Chuck Taylor doing there??????

    I hate her too but let’s face it, men are probably handing her so many gifts, she can’t keep track. And if two big goons showed up at my hotel room with a bag of snakes, I’d say thank you and take it.

    Although her inconvenience comment does her no favours.

  39. anon says:

    I haven’t read the article yet, but that top pic of the beadybeads is flippin’ hilarious. LOL while SMH…

  40. jr says:

    there is no evidence that she kept the diamonds…do you really think she would keep dirty diamonds?

  41. jr says:

    the truth is we’ve all contributed to the massive wars by having cellphones…a natural resource needed to create every cellphone is found and stolen from the Congo.Naomi recieved diamonds but it is not proven that she has kept them.Everyone is ready to judge and call her names…she isn’t the war-lord on trial folks.

  42. hatsumomo says:

    I think she doesn’t admit to having them at all, even in ‘innocence’, because then she’d be asked to give them back. And at the end of the day, diamonds are still diamonds and very valuable.

  43. snappyfish says:

    I believe she never heard of Charles Taylor before that dinner, I believe she never heard of Liberia before that dinner, she is beautiful but stupid is a given.

    What I DO NOT believe is strangers come to her hotel door after this party and give her a black velvet pouch that she doesn’t open until the next day? Shenanigans. She is lying.

    Black velvet pouches scream open me NOW. Plus who takes such things from strangers at your door?

  44. Mandy says:

    I don’t like Naomi Campbell. I don’t know her personally but every bit of evidence says that she is likely an incredibly lousy human being. That said- I can cut her some slack for being vague or self-serving at the mass murder trial of an arms dealer/war criminal. I can’t say that I wouldn’t be trying to keep my ass out of the line of fire every chance I got there too. I don’t expect martyrdom from supermodels.

  45. Mairead says:

    As if this hoor understands the concept of “truth”. Or would have the wherewithal to be truthful if she did. 😡

    @jr, but Naomi is the only one of us who has form for turning those mobiles into WMDs.

  46. Liana says:

    I don’t know what legal repercussions there are, but this is reputation damaging stuff.
    ____________________

    Her reputation already sucks.

  47. Hakika says:

    “What a disgusting example of humanity.” – Absolutely Aenflex.

    I’ve been to both Sierra Leone and Rwanda, and seen the horrific things that people still live with today. The physical mutilation, the mental devastation.

    “I’m just like wanting to get this over with and get on with my life.”

    Regardless of what she is or isn’t lying about – that is just a truly disgusting comment. Do you think she took her cue from the BP oil disaster… maybe they have the same PR manager?

  48. mln says:

    Naomi Cambell is the real life version of Pasty Stone(from Ab Fab) only it isn’t very funny when it’s real

  49. Chris says:

    “Soon her looks will match her disposition and everyone will see her as she actually is.”

    True. The inconvenience line was an absolute shocker. But so typical.

  50. WTF? says:

    Let me get this straight, all this rage against her is because she accepted diamonds from charles taylor? The last time I checked, the United States is the largest consumer of blood diamonds on the planet.
    hypocritical much?

  51. oduroyal says:

    You guys didn’t have to use that horrible picture of Naomi lol!

  52. becca says:

    Look, I get that Naomi was scared to say anything in fear of her family but MY GOD she should NOT be acting so rude to the tribunal! And – just – UGH.

    We all know that Campbell is a disgusting creature, but the fact that she was so rude at the tribunal unsurprising, yet rage inducing.

    Ugh

  53. dj says:

    Feebee & Mia Farrow rock!

  54. Mercedes says:

    Liar, liar, pants on fire! That’s all I have to say about Naomi Campbell. Seriously… if two strange men knock on my door in the middle of the night, I DON’T OPEN THE DOOR and blindly accept the “anonymous” gift they give me. She knows Charles Taylor gave her the gift, she knows they were uncut diamonds… O-M-G! A girl of her materialistic appetites would know what a diamond looks like even if it is in the rough. Funny that the charity she supposedly gave them too never received them….

  55. badrockandroll says:

    I believe that some may have missed the point of what the tribunal is being asked to determine. It has long been alleged that Taylor funded war crimes, hate crimes and crimes against humanity with diamonds. Ms Campbell is one of the few who can actually connect him with diamonds, so sadly the prosecution must rely on the testimony of a truculent dimwitted self-serving lying girl. Taylor’s counsel can drive trucks through the holes in her story, and thus, Taylor may not be convicted for his crimes. All good people should be wondering about the source of their sparkle, but if anyone else out there actually received some “dirty little pebbles” from the bloody hands of a dictator, please report to the Hague ASAP – they really need you!

  56. just me says:

    She is lying. Unless she has a IQ of 72 she would have know what those “Small dirty looking stones” are. “I never heard of Liberia”. What a load of rubbish. And ad to that keeping the Judge waiting!! Who dose she think she is! She thinks she is above the law. Shameful behaviour. Just to prove that good looks dont buy you manners or honesty.

  57. mtngirl says:

    Whaat? No, never! Who wouldn’t wake from slumber to open their door to complete strangers, have a bag of rocks bestowed upon them, then find out at breakfast, from Mia Farrow! there’s a diamond hiding in the bag. I mean, it happens all the time when you are a supermodel, right?

  58. Sally says:

    ..except Jeremy Ratcliffe did have the diamonds. And he’s willing to testify.

    Having said that, ugh Naomi, ugh.

  59. jeu plus dur says:

    Ha, you missed the quote when she said it’s not unusual for her to be given gifts at any time of the day or night.
    Words aren’t cannot adequately convey my contempt for this worthless self-absorbed creature.

  60. Carlos says:

    ‘ I can cut her some slack for being vague or self-serving at the mass murder trial of an arms dealer/war criminal. I can’t say that I wouldn’t be trying to keep my ass out of the line of fire every chance I got there too. I don’t expect martyrdom from supermodels’

    Really? People who aren’t supermodels step up to the plate and display courage, so why can’t she? It’s not about being a martyr, it’s about telling the truth. Also, if testifying at a war criminal’s can’t focus your mind beyond vague recollections, then nothing will.

    Report this comment

  61. Yes of course she is lying, that fact was already established by the courts in her completely contradictory statements.

    Im not sure though why she was invited to dinner in question in the first place with her record and why was Charles Taylor there for that matter, this has tarnished Mandela and his wives reputation and effort in the matter rather badly.

    I mean honestly “I know what lets invite a mass murdering despot with a reputation for cannibalism to dinner and a mad model with a reputation for violence, they are both black should be all right??? No? They even sat them together.

    As far as the diamond/s are concerned you bet your bottom dollar she kept them/it, if other peoples testimonies are anything to go by it was a single enormous uncut irresistible rock.

    The reason I say this is simple, why else would she refuse to testify and why else did she try and change the facts of what happened, right down to who she sat next to at dinner. Trying to cover her tracks but in a hopelessly obvious and inept way.

    Don’t we all want to see people like Taylor safely put away? Apparently not.
    Changing the facts would not make her life any safer but it would certainly have meant if she had been successful that it would’ve meant she didn’t accept and keep the blood diamond, unfortunately for her she only made things worse.

    Campbell is not particularly known for her intelligence it must be said but even so I think the world and Africa in particular with its limited black international celebrities pays far to much heed to celebrity status, an open invitation for trouble.

    I mean if we all followed the philosophies of the likes of Madonna, Kate moss or whomever just because they were celebrities we would be in dire trouble, in this case we would all be drug addicts and wacky religious zealots, so why are they treated with such reverence put in position they should never be?

    Who knows maybe there is a singularly lack of interesting non celebrities to choose from, I doubt this I honestly do, a simple list of Nobel prize winners would be just fine, black or white.

    I suspect its simply PR going horribly wrong at best and complete idiocy at worst.