Mel Gibson may have hired people to intimidate Oksana’s witnesses

Actor Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva pose during the Spanish premiere of the film Edge of Darkness in Madrid in this February 1, 2010 file photo. Los Angeles County Sheriffs department said July 8, 2010 they are looking into claims that Oscar-winning Gibson physically abused his former girlfriend and the mother of one of his children. REUTERS/Juan Medina/Files  (SPAIN - Tags: ENTERTAINMENT CRIME LAW)
Among all the stories about what a verbally and physically abusive piece of trash Mel Gibson is, this particularly resonated with me. Radar Online is reporting that Mel Gibson may have hired “private investigators” to visit and intimidate witnesses who were prepared to testify on behalf of his estranged girlfriend, Oksana Grigorieva. As Radar explains, this sheds light onto the reasons why Oksana’s dentist may have changed his tune about her abuse. (He gave contradictory statements about it to TMZ.)

In a bombshell twist in the scandal, multiple sources have confirmed to RadarOnline.com that Mel’s camp had two private investigators visit at least two star witnesses, who are poised to provide evidence against the Oscar-winning actor/director about the January 6 brawl.

Oksana has told cops investigating the Lethal Weapon star he punched her twice in the face, leaving her with two broken veneers and a concussion.

RadarOnline.com learned that one of the witnesses who was visited by Mel’s private eyes was Oksana’s dentist, Dr. Ross Sheldon.

“This calculated ploy explains the conflicting stories the dentist supposedly made about the injuries Oksana suffered at the hands of Mel,” said a source, with intimate knowledge of the case.

Dr. Sheldon had reportedly privately declared the Russian musician, 40, had no swelling or bruising and there was no evidence of a strike to the mouth, despite photos — seen exclusively on RadarOnline.com — appearing to prove otherwise.

Complicating matters, the comments were in direct contrast to what the dentist said in a declaration to the court, that he believed Oksana suffered injuries from being struck twice, once in the side of the head and once in the mouth.

“Oksana’s camp believe Mel’s private eyes visited the dentist with a clear intent to make a forceful impression,” said the source.

Was it an intimidation tactic?

The source said: “If a level of doubt was created in regards to the dentist’s view about Oksana’s injuries, he could be considered someone who is not a credible witness.

“Mel’s lawyers could easily mount an argument against the dentist: on one hand, Dr. Sheldon protested one statement in a declaration to the court yet, here he was quoted supposedly having an opposing view.”

Despite his apparent conflicting stories, Dr. Sheldon has insisted he is willing to go on record stating that Oksana did indeed suffer a major blow to her mouth.

The dentist’s alleged statement backtracking on Oksana’s injuries was leaked to a Web site. But that Web site was later forced to retract the report after a lawyer representing the dentist made it clear the statements attributed to him were inaccurate.

Two private detectives visited the home of a second witness, RadarOnline.com has also learned.

[From Radar Online]

I love how Radar Online doesn’t name TMZ and just calls them a “website,” just as TMZ never gave credit to Radar when the ran all the tapes of Mel ranting like a lunatic. Obviously there’s some rivalry there.

Witness tampering is incredibly serious and if this is true and Oksana’s people can prove it, it may be much more damning to Mel’s case. I wouldn’t put it past this guy given everything we’ve seen from him so far.

Meanwhile Mel has still not been deposed in his domestic abuse case against Oksana. He missed a scheduled deposition last Friday as he was out of the country reportedly fishing with a couple of his sons. TMZ, which used to be Mel’s mouthpiece but seems a little less biased at this point, reports that he’s “going great lengths to avoid sitting for his deposition.” They claim he’s going to take the 5th and not testify, when it comes to that. The case should be turned over to the District Attorney in about two weeks.

Oksana Grigorieva, ex-girlfriend and mother of Mel Gibson s child, made her way into yet another attorney's office this afternoon in Los Angeles, Ca on July 22, 2010. In her right hand Oksana tightly grips her infamous Iphone that she's used to record countless wicked ranting of her Ex Mel Gibson! Fame Pictures, Inc

LOS ANGELES, CA - MARCH 04: Actor Mel Gibson (R) and Oksana Grigorieva attend The Hollywood Reporter's Nominees' Night Prelude to Oscar presented by Bing and MSN at the Mayor's Residence on Thursday, March 4, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Craig Barritt/Getty Images)

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

30 Responses to “Mel Gibson may have hired people to intimidate Oksana’s witnesses”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. viper says:

    When all is said and done I feel for Mel and esspeically his family.

  2. Kitten says:

    I believe it.

  3. K says:

    DOUCHE.

    Someone should pop him one in the piehole. Or fifty.

  4. cutie says:

    Not sure I believe this. Mel is a horrible being but no lawyer would go along with this knowing it could cost them their career and even jail time.
    Plus has Oskana bought Radar or something?
    Cos she definitely seems to own them.

  5. Eve says:

    Considering everything he’s done so far, I believe he’d be capable of such thing.

  6. Eve says:

    “Mel is a horrible being but no lawyer would go along with this knowing it could cost them their career and even jail time.”

    Cutie, don’t get me wrong…I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you (it may cost a lawyer’s career and jail time indeed). But believe me, there are lawyers out there who would do that.

    I read this quote once and it might make sense in Mel Gibson’s case: “What use is an honest lawyer when what you need is a dishonest one?” (Eric Ambler — British author).

  7. Andrea-2 says:

    There’s too much “he said/she said”, “yes I did/no I didn’t”,and the dentist is claiming the “sources” are wrong. Oksana needs to STFU and just let the courts decide this. The messier it gets, the more information Mel can manipulate and the more they can claim she’s some shrill little harpie out for a buck.

  8. irena NL says:

    Still waiting to make sense of this. Not enough to go on that isn’t toyed with. Patience!

  9. denise says:

    Radar is on a mission to destroy Mel Gibson.

  10. CathyT says:

    Mel’s lawyers aren’t hacks and only hacks would hire private investigators to “intimidate” the witnesses, unless you consider any contact whatsoever to be intimidation. Fortunately the law disagrees. No doubt those investigators were carefully briefed beforehand about what they could and could not say. So far, Mel’s team has been doing everything by the book, unlike Oksana’s side.

    The problem for Oksana is that the statements dentist reportedly made to the private investigator are consistent with his earlier sworn declaration, which stated that Oksana was not hit in the mouth. These are inconsistent with Oksana’s claims to have been punched in the mouth.

    As for delaying his deposition, WHY WOULDN’T HE? It’s for the custody case where Oksana is trying to get sole custody and more money, not the “domestic abuse case.” Oksana is the party trying to change the status quo, so of course her lawyers want to speed things along.

  11. Whatever says:

    I’ll wait for the outcome of the official investigation. All that matters is what the dentist says in court, not to some crappy tabloid website. Radar has no credibility. They are nothing but a microphone for Oksana, their “source” on every story.

  12. aenflex says:

    Lawyers, good personal friends of OJ’s, even one who came out of retirement, (Kardashian), to defend him later admitted to having ‘doubts about his innocence’. Kardashian who purportedly hid OJ’s bad of murder clothes in his own home decided on his death bed that maybe OJ was guilty despite defending him…Why are some people putting lawyers on pedestals? They are fallible, greedy humans just like the rest of us.

  13. MightyMouse says:

    Cathy T, thank you for pointing out the obvious but I implore you, and anyone else without an agenda, not to respond to these threads.

    I have resisted commenting on any of the Mel/Oksana stories for this reason. The torch-wielding, maniacal supporters of either side will jump down your throat for inserting a little common sense.

  14. j. ferber says:

    Defense lawyers are oftentimes scum. They don’t ask the client if he’s guilty or not; they just start working on the case to try to get their client out of whatever disgusting thing he did. And they’re not too choosy about their methods, either. Their job is to muddy the waters to keep the truth from being seen. I lost all respect for defense lawyers after the O.J. Simpson case. Would they intimidate witnesses, too? Hell, yeah, whatever it takes to get the job done. Their aim is not justice. How could it be when they knowingly take on guilty clients? Their aim is to thwart justice. That kind of service doesn’t come cheap, either.

  15. NotBuyingIt says:

    The defense attorney through his investigator has a right to interview any witness or potential witness who may have information relative to his client’s case.

    ROL has taken down the photos that show the ALLEDGED abuse from Mel. Perhaps its because there is a photo surfacing from her past that shows her tooth was chipped when she was married the first time.
    Her first husbands family is very upset that she painted their son as an addict. He wasnt, he was in the military and had a college education. Apparently the family had money and when she couldnt get her hands on it… she divorced him.
    Oh what a tangled web we weave….

  16. annie says:

    @Cathy T., mel’s fishing trip was already planned, and Ox’s lawyers knew that, he never agreed to be there at that time because the trip was scheduled as everyone involved already knew.

  17. j. ferber says:

    Is it me, or does it seem like a lot of Mel’s paid publicists have been working this site big-time?!?

  18. j. ferber says:

    Also, NotBuyingIt, that WOULD be the investigators’ story–we weren’t intimidating, we were interrogating. Try to prove the difference in court. Yup, Mel has it sewn up from all different angles. It’s good to have money if you’re a scumbag. Every criminal knows this.

  19. jane16 says:

    This sort of thing happens in the entertainment industry all the time actually. I know a woman who was threatened by a tv actor once. The poor woman (drop dead gorgeous btw) was just doing her job, and was actually very helpful to the guy, bent over backwards to accomodate her & he informed her co-worker that he was “connected” & that she was going to be paid a “visit”. She went everywhere with her brother and boyfriend for a while. Have heard other stories of intimidation by studio people. These people (actors & actresses esp.) think the world revolves them, they really do.

  20. jane16 says:

    Oops. Meant to say “accomodate him” not her.

  21. NotBuyingIt says:

    First of all ferber, because I happen to have a difference of opinion with you doesn’t make me a paid publicist. I’m just someone that is fascinated by this whole story. I’m especially curious as to why so many people are willing to accept someone is guilty when only one side of the story is being presented by the press. One side of the story that shouldn’t be told because of a gag order that was issued by the court.
    And really ferber, go to any legal site and do a little self investigation instead of relying on gossip sites. All lawyers use investigative services. The prosectutors office use them, you might be familiar with them… they are called police, sherriffs, special investigators for the prosecution, etc.
    I’m a long time visitor to this site, and have always enjoyed the articles. So please, back off the paid Mel publicist crap, it only makes you sound silly.

  22. Whatever says:

    Seriously, this site has far more Oksana supporters. Are they neighbors, friends, Oksana and her sister? Maybe. Probably not. Just people who have a difference of opinion. Any time someone doesn’t trash Mel and kiss Oksana’s ass, someone comes along and accuses them of working for Mel. It’s stupid.

  23. Sean says:

    Admit I appreciate there is still a few people around here not swearing to Mels feet. Excessive remarks have not taken over, whereas on TMZ there is not much space for different opinions, long as a handfull of bloggers create a scene of mobbing, whether paid for it or not. Any fact or fiction that can be found about Oksana, even from when she was only a teenager, is used to describe her mean caracter.

    But did anybody find creepy gossip about her long relationship with Dalton, or came the real trouble only with Mel and his rage?

    An analysis recently published by Tom Laughlin on YouTube, though claiming not to be on Mels side, seems clearly biased. Mel, though admidditly a very dangerous man, is advocated with much care and respect, whereas Oksana is merely seen as seductive and evil. The semi-psychological wisdom of Tom Laughlin looks like another example of celebs backing up on each others.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ3ykXtHl-Q&feature=related

    There is no excuse of abusing! But if the abuser is powerfull enough, his team will twist any argument to attack the victim instead.

  24. Crash2GO2 says:

    jane16, I always enjoy reading your ‘insider’ perspectives. Very educational and eye opening!

  25. Kiska says:

    I wouldn’t put it past Mel as he “owns Malibu” to use his influence and money to intimidate witnesses. Or, perhaps he will pull a “Roman Polanski” and leave the country permanently.

  26. CathyT says:

    Why would he leave the country? The whole point of this deposition is the custody fight over baby Lucia. Unless you think he would kidnap Lucia and leave Tommy and his other kids behind.

  27. NotBuyingIt says:

    hmm… was just checking to see if it was reported here that the Major Crimes Bureau of the Sheriff’s Department has been called in to investigate the extortion part of the criminal case against Oksana. Didn’t think so.

  28. SoCal says:

    Father time hasnt been very kind to Mel, however Oksana looks great.

  29. Debbie says:

    This woman has zero credibility always has, shes a nobody.

    From day one she has never understood the meaning of a gag order.

    Mel’s team have done things from the book , while at every opportunity she has leaked story’s through her pals at radoronline who 9 times out of 10 seem to be camped out her front gate.

    I believe a few people have jumped ship have left her and it’s simply because what story are we meant to believe.

    Story 1,2,3………..10

    Every day there is something NEW coming out, Her differing story’s and straight out lies will end up being the undoing of her.

    The truth will eventually come out but sadly for Oksana it will be the real truth not her version

    Debbie

  30. SimSim says:

    At this point, it seems clear Mel is capable of anything… anything.