Report this comment as spam or abuse

Kat(i)e Homes is a D-list actress AT BEST. The only way she was gonna be in the spotlight (other than for wretched turns on screen) was to be linked to a big star. TinyTom needed a female companion to push aside the rumours that have been dogging him for YEARS. TinyTom took it too far, too fast & that was that. Instead of being a “Golden Couple” they became a fucking freakshow.

I hate that goddamn smirk too. And the way she talks out the side of her mouth. Does it not open all the way?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

You explained everything about her at 5:14, but you don’t know about Chris Klein? And the pregnancy? How is that possible?

Back in the “olden days” Loretta Young “adopted” her own daughter.

She became pregnant, was Roman Catholic, did not believe in abortion, went away for a few months, had the child, made arrangements for her care, went back to Hollywood, and then, after a reasonable period of time, she announced that she had decided to adopt a child, and, her own lawyer “arranged” a private adoption.

So, she raised her own daughter, but the public story was that her daughter was adopted. So, while Loretta Young DENIED her own daughter, Tom Cruise is CLAIMING a daughter that came from someone else.

Has anything changed from those days?

Would it not have been SO MUCH BETTER if Katie would have told the truth and if Tom would have tried to adopt?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Why? Because the nine months were finished and she was due to be born.

After Suri was born, KATIE WAS FORCED TO PRETEND SHE WAS STILL PREGNANT (easy to do when you are hidden in a Scientology fortress where there are zero intrusions). And, the few times she had to go out, she would wear a “false tummy” and no one was the wiser.” WHY did Katie need her in-laws on her honeymoon and while she was pregnant? She didn’t; but, if the baby were already born, that would excuse lots of people being in the house.

Then, NINE months after Tom started dating Katie, it was announced that Suri was born. In time, the press began requesting pictures of Suri, but there were NO baby pictures of Suri at that time, because she was already SIX MONTHS OLD!!!

When Annie Leibovitz was hired to take the first “baby” pictures of Suri, late in the summer, it was obvious that she was much older. She was sitting up, reaching for specific objects, balancing, and interacting with adults on the set. Katie would intercept her own child and press Suri’s arms down, and hold her against her chest, pretending that Suri was still a swaddling infant.

From that time until now, all along the way, these false people have had to continue more of the charade. And, to make matters worse, neither Tom nor Katie have ever had children and do not understand that children have a normal age progression and there isn’t a thing that anyone can do about it.

In May of 2008 (just a day or two ago, Tom, Katie, and Suri were in NYC. Katie was carrying Suri (who is now 2 ½ years old; and looking like quite a young lady) WRAPPED IN A WHITE BABY BLANKET, with BARE FEET, and a BABY BOTTLE. It looked ridiculous. As any parent knows, a 2 ½ year old child can become heavy, but with bare feet, she could hardly have put Suri down on the New York City sidewalk to get any relief. And, this was not just an unintended consequence. There were other pictures of Tom, Katie, and Suri on the same trip, but at a different time, and a different location, and all dressed in different outfits, but THIS TIME, Katie was carrying Suri WRAPPED IN A BLUE BABY BLANKET, and SHE HAD BARE FEET AGAIN!
Katie is going to throw her back out of alignment if she doesn’t quit carrying the kid (who should be walking by now, she’s two and a half).

While most movie stars present their children in high-end strollers and clever outfits, Suri Cruise is a dead weight that has to be physically carried from one place to another; and is such a burden that they don’t even bother putting her shoes on her anymore. [Can you imagine navigating NYC streets with a 2 1/2 year old, barefoot, and with nothing but a big fluffy baby blanket as a “carrier?” The notion is ludicrous.]

Remember how Suri was covered up at their wedding? Again, THEY WERE TRYING TO HIDE HER NATURAL AGE PROGRESSION! As long as they can keep this false front going, the easier it will be to explain at a later date, because each day that goes by,
Suri becomes closer to her peers in their development, and each day their lies will be more difficult to detect.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse