Comments on: R. Kelly case is finally going to be heard in court

By: Hollz

Hollz — Mon, 05 May 2008 23:34:53 +0000

Dee- Child rapist would get more then 36 months, however a man who has sex with a 15 year old would most likely get about 36 months as the girl in question would be old enough to consent (age of consent is 14 here in NB not sure about else where)

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sasha

Sasha — Mon, 05 May 2008 18:27:03 +0000

15 year olds can’t legally agree to sex in this country Dee AND HE’S A GROWN MAN (allegedly) he should know better.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: headache

headache — Mon, 05 May 2008 16:20:23 +0000

Dee, statutory rape is still considered rape in the country.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Déé

Déé — Mon, 05 May 2008 16:09:11 +0000

oh shizz… why would he get 15 years of jail… he didn’t rape anyone. The young girl agreed for having sex… I know it’s not a right way to act but… in canada some child rapist gets something like 36 months of jail, and now you’re saying that because R.Kelly had sex with a young adolescent (who probably intents to seduce him because he’s a wll-known rapper)and that man would get 15 years!!! it’s crazy…
And why it didn’t happen with Alliah, everybody knew they were hanging out, and nobody cares!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mike Belgrove

Mike Belgrove — Mon, 05 May 2008 15:45:05 +0000

Ok, someone help me figure this out cause I’m confused. Juan over at Highbrid Nation told me that this new witness has popped up and is saying that she knows that the girl was underage because she joined Kelly and the underage girl in a threesome. So that makes her guilty and Kelly right? Or was she underage also? Which would make Kelly guity in another underage case. Kelly is off the chain.

Report this comment as spam or abuse