'08
Gwyneth Paltrow appears in high end lingerie and sexy garters for a photo spread that appears in this month’s British GQ. It must have been done at least two months ago before she cut her hair, or it’s possible she’s wearing extensions. Either way, her hair looks gorgeous and it makes you wonder if she should have worked with it a little to avoid the pin-straight 60s ‘do she sported for what seems like several years.
In the accompanying article, she says she’s not a worthy target of the tabloids since she’s so tame:
“I’m not going out without my knickers, and I’m not getting drunk and I’m not on my eighth husband,” she tells writer Johnny Davis. “Sometimes they have to drum up a lot of controversy over nothing.”
The only thing we can accuse Paltrow of being is, well, boring. I mean, she’s cooking family dinners and even recites pasta recipes from memory.
[From E! Online]
Without making shit up and embellishing details about celebrities’ lives, the tabloids would have nothing to talk about. And Gwyneth realizes that if she wasn’t wearing super-short dresses and posing in lingerie for men’s magazines people wouldn’t be talking about her as much.
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Gwyneth Paltrow
- TV Shows that outstayed their welcome [Pajiba]
- Goopy and Cameron Diaz went to a Coldplay concert [Lainey Gossip]
- The bacon milkshake! [D-Listed]
- Ashanti looks... good? [Go Fug Yourself]
- 20 great songs under 2 minutes [Fark]
- Snooki and J-Woww on notice [IDLYITW]
- Jennifer Aniston through the years [Popsugar]
- Kirsten Dunst looks so pretty here [Evil Beet]
- Mila Kunis without makeup [Celebslam]
- The awful cover letter all of Wall St. is mocking [Gawker]
17 Responses to “Gwyneth Paltrow in lingerie for British GQ”
Leave a Reply
By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
shes still fugly
Report this comment as spam or abuse
It did nothing for me….my dick is still sleeping.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She’s beautiful for sure. I hope she didn’t really say knickers… thats just ASKING for peole to start complaining about how you’re trying too hard to be British.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Not boring, incredibly pretentious is more like it.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Gorgeous photography. Shame about the subject. In one of the shots, her bra doesn’t even fit properly. Zzzzzzzzzz.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She really had to have those out, considering her more than scandalously poor performance in Iron Man. She can need all the good press she can get right now, though I’m not sure this’ll really do the trick. I never found her particularly pretty or striking or whatever, so these pics did nothing for me.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I think she’s a yummy mummy. But the whole ” knickers ” thing makes me want to punch her in the face.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She’s been living there, immersed in their culture for years. I’m sure she actually said knickers. Or she could have said pants, but I think Americans have a harder time adopting that term for underwear, since in the States it means underwear.
After reading enough “Britglish”, my vocabulary has definitely shifted. I also picked up random phrases from a one year relationship with a Kiwi. “Britglish” published in the States is usually actually Americanized for the United States audience, so loads of slang and vocab is changed, even if it still has a bit of British in it.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She looks beautiful, but not hot and sexy, per se.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
the term “knickers” is so common on both sides of the pond that it’s like saying “adios”, everyone’s familiar with the word and its meaning. might be worth a snore, cuz of it’s overuse, but certainly nothing to get your knickers in a knot over. (sorry, my bad!)
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Her main problem is her body and her late attempts to show too much skin when she don’t have the bod to flaunt it.
She seems a little pathetic to tryso hard to come accross as sexy.
She is not sexy. She is still pretty, though.
Not like she used to be, but way better than her body.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
For someone who hates the media she sure is a media whore when it suits her.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
WOW… she could BE Blythe Danner 25 years ago in some of those pics!
People who get pissy about people picking up language from other cultures make me pissy, lmao.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Gorgeous!!!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I’m not Gwyneth’s biggest fan, but in fairness to her most British mags automatically doctor American celeb interviews to include British slang. Like, people who hardly ever come here and wouldn’t know half of the words attributed to them – they might say “I like pizza” and it will read “I scoff junk food, it’s fabbo!”. Besides I noticed in a recent Jonathan Ross interview she still seemed pretty clueless about some basic British slang.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I wish they would stop w/this one already. Who are they kidding? Is it that hard to find an interesting beauty in this world? They waste the film on this one. WHO is trying to shove this one down our throats?
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Definately FUGLY!
Report this comment as spam or abuse