'08
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Movies, Reviews, Sex and the City
- Heidi Klum topless in Allure [Celebslam]
- Robert Pattinson's tousled look is expertly styled [D-Listed]
- Britney is back to white tank tops with no bra [Lainey Gossip]
- This cracks me up: Dog Chapman on the accuracy of Bounty Hunter[Popeater]
- How the hell did Rebecca Gayheart lose all her baby weight in 2 weeks?! [Celebrity Baby Scoop]
- Is Chris Rock adopting an African child? [Bossip]
- More photos of Johnny Depp on set [Popsugar]
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
10 Responses to “First critic blasts Sex and The City Movie (movie stills may have spoilers)”
-
Its not the London Times, its a national paper for the whole of the UK. There are other places in the UK other than London. However I agree what a bunch of dumbasses sending a man in; this was probably stupidity rather than an exercise in being objective
-
Plus, if they wanted to sent a man to review the movie then they should have sent my brother because he secretly LOVES SATC
(and no, he is not gay).
-
SATC is utter mindless crap. I mean for entertainment value I guess it’s ok, but I usually felt like my mind was melting. It’s like watching Entourage, although everything seems to go right for them. SAT less so…which is why many women can relate on an emotional level. But spending $400 on a pair of shoes? I simply can’t!
-
Pay 8 dollars to see another version of something I’ve watched for free for several years? Not this girl.
-
I’ve never understood the attraction. Hmm, didn’t the second one from the left win the Kentucky Derby this year?
-
ph, no one else did either which is why Miranda was more relatable and Samantha was more fun than Carrie. I love Big but I never forgave her for that big mess with Aidan. That man was PERFECTION!
-
OMFG, I CAN’T WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
why would they send a man to this movie? duh. and i agree with jaclyn:
OMFG, I CAN”T WAIT EITHER!!
-
2 hours and 20 minutes is pretty long for a movie these days.
The women’s reactions may not be useful–presumably the biggest fans (who are the most invested in the film) are the first to see the film. But at least we know it doesn’t tank.
Leave a Reply
Celebitchy aims to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.By commenting you agree to our comment policy
Use the "Report this comment as spam or abuse" link to ask the moderators to delete a comment if it's offensive. If your comment disappears, it has been eaten by the spam filter. Please e-mail cbcomments at gmail.com to get it retrieved.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
Well the ironic twist is that most of the movies that get bad reviews are the ones who do really well in the box office so this could be good news for the SATC movie.
Also, I totally agree with you celebitchy that the London Times should have NOT sent a man and most people who saw the movie said that it was really good.
Report this comment as spam or abuse