'08
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Movies, Reviews, Sex and the City
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
10 Responses to “First critic blasts Sex and The City Movie (movie stills may have spoilers)”
-
Its not the London Times, its a national paper for the whole of the UK. There are other places in the UK other than London. However I agree what a bunch of dumbasses sending a man in; this was probably stupidity rather than an exercise in being objective
-
Plus, if they wanted to sent a man to review the movie then they should have sent my brother because he secretly LOVES SATC
(and no, he is not gay).
-
SATC is utter mindless crap. I mean for entertainment value I guess it’s ok, but I usually felt like my mind was melting. It’s like watching Entourage, although everything seems to go right for them. SAT less so…which is why many women can relate on an emotional level. But spending $400 on a pair of shoes? I simply can’t!
-
Pay 8 dollars to see another version of something I’ve watched for free for several years? Not this girl.
-
I’ve never understood the attraction. Hmm, didn’t the second one from the left win the Kentucky Derby this year?
-
ph, no one else did either which is why Miranda was more relatable and Samantha was more fun than Carrie. I love Big but I never forgave her for that big mess with Aidan. That man was PERFECTION!
-
OMFG, I CAN’T WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
why would they send a man to this movie? duh. and i agree with jaclyn:
OMFG, I CAN”T WAIT EITHER!!
-
2 hours and 20 minutes is pretty long for a movie these days.
The women’s reactions may not be useful–presumably the biggest fans (who are the most invested in the film) are the first to see the film. But at least we know it doesn’t tank.
Enonymouse:
Jackie:
paris herpes:
Sasha:
KDRockstar:
headache:
Jaclyn:
kate:
Other Karen:
Leave a Reply
Comment Policy: Please be courteous as if you are having a conversation in person. No all-caps posts. If you make comments using different nicknames, repeatedly harass others, or spam, you will be banned. If you make an exceptionally rude comment that people complain about, it will be deleted. Do not dominate the threads by making the same point over and over again or you will be banned. We understand and respect that threads can get heated. Threads will occasionally be closed if the conversation gets very nasty. Repeatedly baiting other commenters or giving rude and attacking responses is not allowed. It's a shame we have to mention that because most of you are kind and respectful of other's opinions.
Comments occasionally become monitored due to spammer's keywords, but are otherwise not monitored. We are not responsible for comments in any way and while we work hard to moderate hate words and clean them up we do not have the time or inclination to ensure that they're all acceptable to everyone. In other words - do not blame us for stupid or offensive comments. You will find them on almost every open comment site online. Use the "report spam or abuse" link to get us to delete something if it's offensive.
Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar
Well the ironic twist is that most of the movies that get bad reviews are the ones who do really well in the box office so this could be good news for the SATC movie.
Also, I totally agree with you celebitchy that the London Times should have NOT sent a man and most people who saw the movie said that it was really good.
Report this comment as spam or abuse