Comments on: First critic blasts Sex and The City Movie (movie stills may have spoilers)

By: Other Karen

Other Karen — Thu, 15 May 2008 20:56:06 +0000

2 hours and 20 minutes is pretty long for a movie these days.

The women’s reactions may not be useful–presumably the biggest fans (who are the most invested in the film) are the first to see the film. But at least we know it doesn’t tank.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kate

kate — Tue, 13 May 2008 23:23:37 +0000

why would they send a man to this movie? duh. and i agree with jaclyn:

OMFG, I CAN”T WAIT EITHER!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jaclyn

Jaclyn — Tue, 13 May 2008 21:07:46 +0000

OMFG, I CAN’T WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: headache

headache — Tue, 13 May 2008 19:07:55 +0000

ph, no one else did either which is why Miranda was more relatable and Samantha was more fun than Carrie. I love Big but I never forgave her for that big mess with Aidan. That man was PERFECTION!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: KDRockstar

KDRockstar — Tue, 13 May 2008 17:21:19 +0000

I’ve never understood the attraction. Hmm, didn’t the second one from the left win the Kentucky Derby this year?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sasha

Sasha — Tue, 13 May 2008 16:41:21 +0000

Pay 8 dollars to see another version of something I’ve watched for free for several years? Not this girl.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: paris herpes

paris herpes — Tue, 13 May 2008 16:11:25 +0000

SATC is utter mindless crap. I mean for entertainment value I guess it’s ok, but I usually felt like my mind was melting. It’s like watching Entourage, although everything seems to go right for them. SAT less so…which is why many women can relate on an emotional level. But spending $400 on a pair of shoes? I simply can’t!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Enonymouse

Enonymouse — Tue, 13 May 2008 15:00:36 +0000

Plus, if they wanted to sent a man to review the movie then they should have sent my brother because he secretly LOVES SATC (and no, he is not gay).

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jackie

Jackie — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:19:33 +0000

Its not the London Times, its a national paper for the whole of the UK. There are other places in the UK other than London. However I agree what a bunch of dumbasses sending a man in; this was probably stupidity rather than an exercise in being objective

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Enonymouse

Enonymouse — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:12:27 +0000

Well the ironic twist is that most of the movies that get bad reviews are the ones who do really well in the box office so this could be good news for the SATC movie.
Also, I totally agree with you celebitchy that the London Times should have NOT sent a man and most people who saw the movie said that it was really good.

Report this comment as spam or abuse