'06

This baby just does not exist or something is wrong with it. People claim that Cruise is holding Suri back because of his wacko cult religion, Scientology, or because he didn’t get enough cash for the photos, but there hasn’t even been a bundle photographed. Now his celebrity friends claim to have never seen the mystery spawn, either:
Even if they wanted to shield the baby from the negative influence of the media or whatever, we still would have seen Katie or a nanny/Scientology handler out walking with a stroller or holding a covered bundle.
Katie even went to her parent’s house in Ohio at the end of May, and there were no photographs of the supposed baby.
All we have to vouch for Suri’s existence is a report from an “eyewitness” who saw a bundle from very far away.
Readers of Celebrity Baby Blog came up with several plausible theories to explain the Suri mystery:
WTF is going on? They better procure a baby that sort of looks like them fast, because this is turning into one of the biggest Hollywood scandals ever.
Header image is an original illustration by the Grumpy Old Indian Man. Images of Tom Cruise from late June. [via]
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Babies, Cults, Katie Holmes, Scandals, Tom Cruise, TomKat
7 Responses to “NO ONE has seen Suri Cruise”
-
yeah… you would think that Tom wouldm ake Katie bring the baby outside, or at least walk around carrying a rolled up blanket…
-
Still think there’s no conspiracy..still, if even his friends are starting to murmur….BTW Celebitchy, who are Prince Planets parents in the picture..doesn’t look like TomKat…too good looking
(Mr+Mrs Planet???) -
You know, they’ve waited so long that I don’t care if I EVER see his spawn. Neither is very attractive, IMO, at worst, they have a monster on their hands or at best, an average-looking baby.
Keep it hidden Tom, we don’t want anything to call more attention to you. Just go away!
-
Is it me or do none of you out there recall that Tom was unable to impregnate any of his previous wives, even though they all “tried?”
I do remember, and my thoughts (though heavy on the speculation side) are that this pregnancy was faked and that an adoption was in the works. I don’t think it would be hard at all for someone with so much power and money to convince a young, naive, and admittedly formerly in-love fan who is also a low-tier actress with no spotlight (and perhaps needing some?) to “conceive” of said child and iron out the custody details afterwards (after all–what would she have to lose? NOTHING! BINGO!.
As to the rumors that she may be pregnant “again,” hmm…
Perhaps Tom thinks it’s his and is delaying the big public unveiling of his child while it is baking in the oven? Or perhaps…he knows it isn’t?
In any case, keep in mind this is all speculation based on the one true fact: Tom was never able to father children. Not that this is anyone’s personal business, except to clear up why this “Suri” child does not, in fact, yet exist. -
And, my apologies for not clarifying this sooner, but I have nothing against Katie Holmes, but I do feel for her in getting wrapped up in this mess (with or without any hypothetical benefits). As for Tom, I just think anything a scientologist does (and I say this from very personal experience) is bizarre and might as well be an alien reaction. There is always a more efficient, more direct, more NORMAL way to solve problems than the “Scientology way,” as we can all learn from his example. Scientology is obviously not a model for any of us to follow, who wish to have normal, spiritually (or socially) enlightened lives.
-
And, my apologies for not clarifying this sooner, but I have nothing against Katie Holmes, but I do feel for her in getting wrapped up in this mess (with or without any hypothetical benefits). As for Tom, I just think anything a scientologist does (and I say this from very personal experience) is bizarre and might as well be an alien reaction. There is always a more efficient, more direct, more NORMAL way to solve problems than the “Scientology way,” as we can all learn from his example. Scientology is obviously not a model for any of us to follow, who wish to have normal, spiritually (or socially) enlightened lives.






















This is getting weird.. at first I though he’s just keeping her in the estate, but if so, why not allow close Scientologist friends to see her? If the Smiths say he’s coming up with excuses, I start to wonder. I’m convinced she was pregnant though. Even if this is not Tom’s baby and doesn’t look like Tom, you can have a pic taken from far and show Katie carrying a bundle, right? Also, babies tend to look generic, so unless it’s a black baby (!!), Tom wouldn’t worry that someone will say it’s not his. Malformation issue–again, can take a pic from far, just to show there IS a baby.
Lainey has a new and interesting theory that Katie snapped out of her zombie-like state after birth and is putting up a fight over the baby, brainwashing etc, and refuses to show the baby. Another of her sources mentions that she could be depressed and is not willing to pose or show the baby.
Report this comment as spam or abuse