Comments on: Angelina Jolie and Clint Eastwood at “The Changeling” photocall

By: Mairead

Mairead — Wed, 21 May 2008 11:59:16 +0000

Oh dear - it looks like I didn’t let reading the comments properly get in the way of a good rant.

I apologise for stating that the commentators here were saying that Angie WAS in her 40s rather than LOOKING LIKE she was in her 40s.

I had read similar sentiments on another thread and confused the two.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mairead

Mairead — Tue, 20 May 2008 23:00:24 +0000

As for Angie’s age and lips. I had always heard and seen lips get thinner rather than bigger as a person gets older.

Now the age - unless the Antilinas are going to accuse a dead woman of being a lying attention-seeker, Marcheline Bertrand’s birth year is listed as 1950. If we’re pretending that Angie is into her 40s (i.e. 41 or older and born in the mid-60s) that would mean that Marcheline was at least 15 or 16 when Angie was born. Therefore even younger when James was born!!! It’s a brave person who’d accuse John Voight of having such a child bride.

Now can we consider the images taken of Angie at the 1986 Oscars (with the big collar) - you’ll note a full top lip btw. But are the Antilinas trying to pass that girl of as being 18 in that photo??

But hey, let’s not let anything as inconvenient as logic get in the way eh?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mairead

Mairead — Tue, 20 May 2008 22:52:05 +0000

Now let me state that I am not “anti-Nicole” - she’s a fine actress, a tad mannered for my taste, but still is excellent in nearly everything she does.

But seriously, how can you call Angie “fake for having botox” (as well as an alleged nosejob - it looks a tad thinner to me, but as monica posted, head size changes) and celebrate Nicole as being “natural”

I mean - seriously? Clear your screen love.

And while we’re at it - Nicole used to “naturally” have a very high colouring (look at her Aussie films and photos from the 80s) - so her icy beauty is a much more recent creation.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: monica

monica — Tue, 20 May 2008 19:12:27 +0000

angelina is a natural beauty who happens to have had cosmetic enhancements, i.e. she does get upper lip injections which is very apparent in beofre and after pictures of when she was younger compared to now. lips do grow continuosly, as do heads, noses and ears but the dramatic difference between her pictures only indicate cosmetic enhancements (i’m married to a plastic surgeon.)
for her age, my husband and myself agree that although she has great bone structure, she does appear to be older than her siad years. to me, she looks to be in her early 40’s.
and…congrats to nicole kidman. i agree with other users that i would feel blessed to be pregnant, especially after so many known difficulties, and i for one do not see this as a way to seek attention.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Suzy

Suzy — Tue, 20 May 2008 18:46:40 +0000

Angelina has had surgery and botox like a large majority of celebrities. Once someone has their features inhanced via botox or any other cosmetic surgery he/she is no longer natural looking, including angelina.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: geronimo

geronimo — Tue, 20 May 2008 16:54:08 +0000

@Riri - Not bashing, just stating an opinion. That’s allowed, isn’t it?

And I hardly need to point out that you’re on very thin ground here with your Nic-bashing lecture when you’ve done nothing but Angie-bash on here. I, unlike you, am fairly indifferent to both so what I’m giving is an objective, unbiased opinion. For the record, Nicole WAS a natural beauty. I personally don’t think she’s that any more and it’s a shame. OK?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jody

Jody — Tue, 20 May 2008 16:35:26 +0000

I am wondering if this is also the same movie that came out in the 70’s? It was a ghost story with the exact same title. I’m not so sure Clint would do a ghost type flick though. It was a great movie though, scared the crap outta me.

I think Angie looks natural and beautiful in these photos.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: headache

headache — Tue, 20 May 2008 16:26:23 +0000

I’m not talking about the fact that she’s holding her tummy. All pregnant mommies rest their hands on their tummy rather subconciously as a protective gesture I guess. Angie and Cate did it throughout their pregnancies. What I’m referring to is the odd way Nicole holds her belly and actually, she’d not even holding it so much as gathering the fabric of her dress under it.

It’s just odd to me. That’s all.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Diva

Diva — Tue, 20 May 2008 16:18:48 +0000

God, she’s gorgeous! Hate her all you want for who you think she is, but it’s just petty jealousy to go negative about her looks!

I think Nicole Kidman is adorable with her tummy touches. As a 35 year old woman who has desperately wanted a child for over a decade, if I’m ever blessed to carry a child, I will be holding on to that baby inside 24/7! I suppose all the people who get to take having babies for granted will roll their collective eyes at me, too, lol, but I SOOO wouldn’t care. Go, Nicole, hold your baby tummy!