Comments on: Sex tape shown in R. Kelly trial

By: swingers

swingers — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:53:15 +0000

This doesnt seem like enough evidence to convict.

By: rose

rose — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:48:45 +0000

@Grammar police

I do not need you to correct my speech.Last time I check this was a celebrity blog not a job interview or a classroom.
Instead of appointing for yourself the Grammar police on CB, maybe you should go out and get a real job.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: headache

headache — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:39:55 +0000

It’s well known that R Kelly has an interest in teen girls. I mean he didn’t marry Aaliyah for the money. But in this country, we have standard for a conviction and if you cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it’s him and her and that she is underage, then you can’t convict him.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gods watching

gods watching — Thu, 22 May 2008 15:34:52 +0000

It is amazing to me that as a society we don’t protect our children! if that CHILD’S mother or father did not protect her from the ills of society is that her fault? Of course not! we are all born into this world expecting to be protected. This man has an opportunity to impact masses of people but instead his grown (old) behind takes advantage of easy prey. And we have people that blame the child! It espcially alarms me to hear a woman say she looked like she knew what she was doing. I thought women’s natural instinct is to nurture. We are truly living in the last DAYS!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Butterfly

Butterfly — Thu, 22 May 2008 02:44:05 +0000

R Kelly is a musical genius and he made that decision to mess his life up………I don’t feel sorry for him at all.Maybe now he will start thinking like an adult and not a idiot!!!!!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Grammar Police

Grammar Police — Thu, 22 May 2008 01:44:58 +0000

You don’t say: “I SEEN the tape.”
You say: “I SAW the tape.”

That said, these little girls are looking and acting way older than they are. No girl should be wandering around concerts on her own at 13! Shame on the parents.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: daisyfly

daisyfly — Thu, 22 May 2008 00:47:13 +0000

Yeah. Don’t convict him because of what some rag says. Let him go to molest more children. It’s the American way. /sarcasm

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: SOLO

SOLO — Wed, 21 May 2008 22:21:14 +0000

Wow! That’s pretty amazing. It’s shocking to me that 3 of you don’t want him to be convicted and the other one wants to blame the girl. I see people allow lots of things when you can make hit records. Just because she can decide does not mean she should, that’s why they call 13 year olds minors.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: rose

rose — Wed, 21 May 2008 20:16:38 +0000

I seen the tape years ago,before charges were brought up against him and it just a rumor that he was having sex with a young female.In my own opinion it looked like him,but like CB and Jaybird said that is probably not enough to convict.
At the beginning of the tape he was having sex with an adult woman and we were all like “what’s the big deal?” but then on the next scene you see this girl who looks very, very young and our jaws dropped!
From that day, I refused to listen to any of his songs and will not allow his songs to be played in my home. My husband simply DETEST that man.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: dan

dan — Wed, 21 May 2008 18:55:12 +0000

13 or not the girl was a willing participant. I personally think it’s disgusting, but it’s not like he raped her. When i was 13 I was definitely old enough to decide who i was going to have sex with, whether or not i wanted someone to pee on me naked, etc… Again, it’s disgusting BUT he didn’t rape her. He does need to seek mental health help for his problem and where the heck is the girl’s parents? Didn’t they teach her right and wrong?

Report this comment as spam or abuse