Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jul 19
'06
What’s more real: Suri or the Loch Ness Monster?


People are comparing Suri to Bigfoot, so I thought I’d change it to the Loch Ness Monster to be original. Like Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster, there are “eyewitness” accounts, but no verifiable photographs of the Scientology savior, Suri Cruise. Something’s wrong with the baby or it simply does not exist. Katie may have had it earlier than “expected” or she may have suffered an unfortunate miscarriage that hasn’t been acknowledged. Regardless there is something off about this story that needs to be exposed by the mainstream gossip press.

All sane celebrity friends of Tom and Katie have yet to see the baby, except for Leah Remini, a devout Scientologist who now claims to have seen the infant:

Entertainment Tonight reports that the actress said in an interview in the upcoming issue of Us Weekly that she visited the baby several weeks ago.

“She’s a newborn and normal size!” Remini said.

Like Tom Cruise, Remini is a member of the Church of Scientology.

Even though they had a very public courtship, Cruise and Holmes have not presented their baby in public and so far haven’t inked a deal with a magazine for exclusive photos of the baby.

Conspiracy theories abound in the tabloid press and on blogs about why baby Suri hasn’t been seen. Some even speculate that the baby doesn’t exist at all, while others point out that Tom Cruise also kept his two adopted children, Isabella, 13, and Connor, 11, out of the public eye when they were little.

As for Suri, a family friend described the baby as “a cross between the two – [with] dark, straight hair and dark eyes.”

Yeah, so we’ll take your word for it, Leah Remini, even though Suri or a bundle resembling an infant has never been photographed despite hoards of paparrazi trailing the Holmes-Cruise family for the past three months. The infant also hasn’t been seen by non-Scientology celebrities since it was said to be born three months ago, and the “birth certificate” is suspect.

There’s a far-away blurry picture of Katie Holmes holding a tow-headed baby, but that’s probably a fake. There’s also a far-away picture of what looks like a baby carriage, but it could be a prop or something else entirely.

None of Katie’s family has seen the baby according to reports, but Katie was said to have visited them in Ohio at the end of May - and to have brought Suri with her! WTF is going on?!

Katie was spotted back in LA visiting her favorite overpriced store, Barneys. As one commentor on x17 points out, she didn’t buy any baby items. I always get something for my son when I’m shopping.

The bloggers always uncover stories before the mainstream press does, and this is no exception. It’s not as important as a lack of WMD in Iraq, but it’s just as obvious.

Header image from Pink is the New Blog. Other images from x17online.

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Babies, Katie Holmes, Photos, Scandals, Tom Cruise, TomKat

One Response to “What’s more real: Suri or the Loch Ness Monster?”

  1. This is getting fucking creepy. If these two really want to address the rumors that her pregnancy and spawning were fake, they’d better give us at least one good shot of the alienspawn.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • Christina X: More validation to her self-importance, I see. :roll: I didn’t think anyone else cared about this...
  • Queenbofharlem: Kaiser i agree 100% with you ..you are not alone
  • rottenkitty: I swear her cheek is going to go flying across the room if she’s not careful. Kabbalah isn’t...
  • Ria: It’s a physical response. During stressful situations, a man will, er, shrink to pull the goodies in close...
  • RubySue: @ Gigohead: I’m not mentioning this as though you don’t already know, but for lay people:...
  • Best of British: Wif/Kaiser - I also love Pride and Prejudice and adore both the BBC version and the movie. I think...
  • insidescoop: Wow, I didn’t realize how many people really don’t like her. I have to say that I am signed...
  • victoria: I did watch the Brit show and I tell ya- the kid is totally fragile. She had a bunch of canned responses...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.