Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jun 10
'08
Lindsay Lohan selling leggings



<< last image     next image >>

Written by JayBird

Posted in Fashion, Lindsay Lohan, Lindsay Lohan, Relationship trouble, Samantha Ronson

Pages: 1 2 3 4

23 Responses to “Lindsay Lohan selling leggings”

  1. She looks truely awful these days

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. I believe the term is: Jack of all trades, master of none.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. Leggings? Wow, she’s beginning to make Jessica Simpson look sophisticated.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! WILL THE MADNESS EVER END?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. Jeez. Even for the low end of the price range, $40, I want a halfway decent pair of slacks I can wear to work, not stupid leggings. Having Marilyn Monroe’s birthdate on the tag would not up their value in my eyes.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. That the girl wants to sell leggings some a rather logic twist.
    But $140 leggings?

    Excuse me?
    Let me have a good cough.
    There you go, fur ball.

    I can buy three pairs of professional quality ballet dancing leggings for that price.
    Which I’d wear to go my dancing class. Not to look “trendy”. Leggings were in four years ago. And they were out of fashion again two weeks later. :mrgreen:

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. Cashmere leg warmers and ankle gloves. REALLY? She’s THAT dissatisfied with socks and pants? Will Samantha be sporting them? That would make me smile.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. Memo to Lindsay:

    The 80’s are OVER.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. What the hell are ankle gloves anyway?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. Gah, what a stupid thing to manufacture. Nobody even wears leggings except Lindsey and Sienna Miller, and even they look retarded in them, and cotton ones photograph especially poorly and don’t last. :?

    Not to mention the RULE CARVED IN STONE: OVER 30? DO NOT PUNISH THE WORLD BY WEARING LEGGINGS. We don’t want to seeeee!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  11. …foil…. prints…. FOIL …. on cotton leggings…. *mindf*ck :!: *

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  12. why waste $140 on leggings when everybody can buy them cheaper like $5 or so. Shes an idiot. Especially for selling them during the summer!

    also who’d want to buy leggings with knee pads?……?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  13. I still have some leggings, gg, and I’ve been 30 twice now. I no longer wear them outside the house, but they’re great for scrubbing the bathroom floor.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  14. Marilyn’s birthday, huh? Well, that makes sense. There are so many photos of her in leggings.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  15. “also who’d want to buy leggings with knee pads?……?”

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that coked-out, firecrotched skanks who like to get busy in bathroom stalls and stairwells would find good use in leggings with knee pads.

    *coughcough*

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  16. The only thing that leggings are good for is wearing -under- long skirts in the winter where really cold weather is a factor. Although there was that one summer when I was 15 and peasant skirts were ALL the rage, and my mom made me wear leggings under them. But that was longer ago than I care to admit. :)

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  17. That’s why they call her ‘Leggings Lohan”

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  18. dood. shes gona insane i mena like lindsey lohann is a bitchh. i dont really mean itt. but shes like a lemme see…, bratt?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  19. ‘Marilyn’s birthday, huh? Well, that makes sense. There are so many photos of her in leggings.’

    You just completely cracked my shit up…that was hilarious!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  20. The only people wearing leggings regularly are Lindsay, Tyra Banks and the incredibly lumpy-assed women frequently spotted shopping in Wal-Mart.
    The latter don’t spend 40$ on them, let alone 140$! :twisted:

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  21. I think having marilyn monroe’s bday was not the greatest idea. But I’m sure there will be plenty on here who are commenting who will go and buy these american apparel knock offs at wolford prices (who are both also overpriced, but at least they are established). People are so quick to talk shit, but if these idiots weren’t out here buying what all their celebs wear or stick their names on, it would be a much tougher to start some nonsense line among the many our materialistic society currently supports. Myself included unfortunately, but no more, I refuse to make whomever rich off my misery and hard earned money

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  22. How much lower can she stoop? First she thinks that she is a fashion icon and just can’t keep from self promoting but Lindsay, those tights are butt ugly. Also, you are not Ellen, so please don’t sell your coming out story for money, that is just a hideous thing to do and only serves to take integrity from others, like the aforementioned Ellen, who are not in a freak circus act of a relationship. Denegrate yourself much Linds???

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  23. she really was be bored and more than once I’m sure

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Leave a Reply


Comment Policy: Please be courteous as if you are having a conversation in person. No all-caps posts. If you make comments using different nicknames, repeatedly harass others, or spam, you will be banned. If you make an exceptionally rude comment that people complain about, it will be deleted. Do not dominate the threads by making the same point over and over again or you will be banned. We understand and respect that threads can get heated. Threads will occasionally be closed if the conversation gets very nasty. Repeatedly baiting other commenters or giving rude and attacking responses is not allowed. It's a shame we have to mention that because most of you are kind and respectful of other's opinions.

Comments occasionally become moderated due to spammer's keywords and abuse complaints against specific users, but are otherwise not moderated. We are not responsible for comments in any way and while we work hard to moderate hate words and clean them up we do not have the time or inclination to ensure that they're all acceptable to everyone. In other words - do not blame us for stupid or offensive comments. You will find them on almost every open comment site online. Use the "report spam or abuse" link to get us to delete something if it's offensive.

:D :-) :( :o 8O :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

Get an icon next to your name by signing up for a free Gravatar

Recent Comments:
  • Diva: Actually… she lobbied for it, GOT it, said she didn’t want it, but never gave the money back…...
  • Trashaddict: Colic is so miserable. So no matter how privileged, I do feel for her. But with all that help around,...
  • stellapurdy: Too bad Palin didn’t continue to lobby for that money for “The Bridge to Nowhere”...
  • Goddess711: I’ll bet Jennifer Aniston is laughing her a** off! Looks good on these two needy, spotlight...
  • Jake Long: Hi. I’m a white dude and I love my latina women. I love how passionate they get when I’m...
  • AP: I think Crispin Porter and Bogusky (the agency behind this ad) finally crashed. Maybe they were high when they...
  • Christina: i have to say, either way… this girl is gorgeous…
  • Anne: I thought it was funny.
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.