Comments on: Katherine Heigl withdraws from Emmy’s race, citing bad material

By: sallysitwell

sallysitwell — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:32:26 +0000

I can’t stand Katie Heigl. She seems to have an ugly personality.

By: Persistent Cat

Persistent Cat — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:40:52 +0000

When was Jennifer Aniston acting that way? She never slagged the show, she co-operated with the cast, she never whined or threw herself a “pity party” after her husband left her for another woman. She kept quiet and always showed a lot of class.

Heigl on the other hand needs a good backhand and I wouldn’t mind kicking her pedestal out from under her.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kaiser/Devil Hippacrat WTF

Kaiser/Devil Hippacrat WTF — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:51:50 +0000

Thank you, Jaded Envy. There are a lot of similarities: bitching about salaries, taking credit for other people’s work, the never-ending Pity Parties, the compulsive need to ingratiate oneself with the Minivan Majority, and slagging off the people you worked with and your own films/TV projects…

Mark my words, La Heigel is another La Aniston. :X

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Codzilla

Codzilla — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:09:23 +0000

Vermillion: so true about Katherine’s not-so-subtle implication that her absence will give another actress a chance she wouldn’t have had otherwise. All this attitude is going to sink her in the end.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jaded Envy

Jaded Envy — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:39:48 +0000

Kaiser, I DO see the similarites. Both TV stars, Aniston and Heigl are not content there but expect to be able to be just as successful on the big screen. When Jennifer accepted her Emmy (or whatever she won) didn’t she say, “Oscar next!” I think it takes a certain arrogance to think like that. What is it based on? Just an entitlement that should be bestowed on them for . . . what?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Vermillion

Vermillion — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:06:31 +0000

I find it hilarious that, according to her, even though the material was not up to her standards, she would have still won over people with better writing behind them. So she should be congratulated for letting those actresses have a shot, since her ACT—TING!!! is so good they wouldn’t have a chance otherwise.

Really nice.

The Caruso comparison is dead on. And considering that she, like Caruso, is on a popular genre show on ABC, that seems to be a bad omen.

Kaiser, I don’t see how Aniston anywhere near similar. At least she was quite aware that Friends was the best thing going for her at the time, and didn’t try to pull any shenanigans.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kaiser

Kaiser — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:24:20 +0000

Another hilarious post. These TV girls who think they’re the second coming of Julia Roberts always crack me up.

Hiegel, Aniston, et al need to seriously get over themselves.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: cmoody

cmoody — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:41:02 +0000

Clooney may not slam ER but he isn’t all that appreciative for the help he got from The Facts of Life either.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: KateNonymous

KateNonymous — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:24:17 +0000

The Ugly Truth is that she’s not that good. She’s okay, but she’s not amazing.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: neelyo

neelyo — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:17:48 +0000

What an ego. And yes, if she was really a good actress she’d be able to make bad material work.

You never heard George Clooney slamming ER while he was still on it. I hope ABC gives her the same treatment as Suzanne Sommers when she tried to screw over THREE’S COMPANY. They kept her under contract and banished her character to visiting her grandmother so she never worked with any of the cast, regular directors or crew and was confined to one or two minutes per show.

Report this comment as spam or abuse