Comments on: “R. Kelly is acquitted of all charges” links

By: ellie

ellie — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:36:58 +0000

The Rrrrrr should crawl under a rock and just stay there. He’s as guilty as sin and the jurors said “they believed it was him, but without the cooperation of the young girl in the video it was hard to convict!!” BS!!! It WAS him in the video and the child was so undeveloped, barely reached puberty and what he did to her was absolutely horrible. He is a pedophile and paid off this girl along with other little girls. I wonder if any of the jurors would allow him to babysit their daughters???!!! He’s a perverted sick individual!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: headache

headache — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:02:58 +0000

It’s not a case of him being a celebrity or the jurors not knowing he did it. The prosecution could simply not prove their case to the standards the court requires for a guilty verdict.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: NIKKI

NIKKI — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:39:46 +0000

yes! let’s let the paedophile walk. He’ll do it again, and again, and again.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gg

gg — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:45:55 +0000

I am still a little freaked out by the revelation that he carries around a bag of porno ‘everywhere he goes’, as reported by several witnesses. This is a dangerous sex addict here.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: TINKERLOVE

TINKERLOVE — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:46:34 +0000

No offense, I really thoght that the pied piper was taken his azz to jail
I also understand the girls position and see why see would`nt want to be exposed that way This case is over but Kelly will get his sooner than later His dumb azz might go back out there in the world and do it again I hope these girls are much smarter than 6 years ago

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: vdantev

vdantev — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:27:36 +0000

Everybody b*tches about trial results that end in a declaration of innocence, until it’s their ass on the line then it’s all “PRAISE THE LORD!”

That’s the price we pay for a trial by jury, it isn’t perfect deal with it.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Scott F.

Scott F. — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:55:29 +0000

Sure Anonymous Realist, because no one who’s ever been let off the hook was guilty right?

Yeah, and OJ is still out there looking for the ‘real killers’.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: chris

chris — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:33:04 +0000

Damn shouldnt he have served time by now? Anybody else would have even the “stars”

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Anonymous Realist

Anonymous Realist — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:07:25 +0000

I guess everyone here screaming “guilty” has more information than the jury did? He was tried and found not guilty. Therefore he is not guilty. Move on.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Herman Bumfudle

Herman Bumfudle — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:25:41 +0000

if some little cutie lies to me about her age. she and her girlfriends will be working at home depot and best buy to furnish our mansion. and i’d be flipping mansions for a living, while they get their degree.

Report this comment as spam or abuse