Comments on: Sienna Miller’s friends claim she’s not a homewrecker

By: DLR

DLR — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:32:13 +0000

“Sienna didn’t break up his marriage,” says the friend. “It’s been in trouble for a year. The truth is, they’ve quietly separated.”

Yeah, right, last I heard pregnancy lasted 8 to 9 months. If Sienna is not a “homewrecker” then I’m the Queen of England.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lauri

Lauri — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:36:59 +0000

They are both sleazoids. Here’s hoping that Rosetta finds herself a really wonderful man in the not too distant future. And here’s hoping the sleazoids get what they deserve, as well (like maybe STDs?)

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Bodhi

Bodhi — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:07:40 +0000

Again, ditto…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Syko

Syko — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:02:05 +0000

Well, he married the giant blockhead. Must have liked something about her.

And I rather doubt Sienna’s all that tight, what with the dozens of visitors.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Bodhi

Bodhi — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:51:17 +0000

gg- It really depends on the state of primary residence…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gg

gg — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:40:28 +0000

Just a posit here: If they live in the States, there really isn’t such a thing as a “legal separation” — somebody leaves the marital home and bam, you’re separated. No papers are needed. But sometimes people are dysfunctional and codependent and keep living together “during the divorce” (not) and drama occurs, they’re both responsible. But he is a PIG.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Bodhi

Bodhi — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:31:41 +0000

I don’t really believe in homewreckers. I think if it’s a happy home, nobody’s going to wreck it.

Ditto all the way!! The married party CHOOSES to stray/leave/abscond/bail. As far as I know, there is no magic “leave your husband/wife” potion.

If one half of a married couple isn’t fulfilled by the marriage and chooses the company of another, there are serious problems that existed before the 2nd party became an issue. The demise of a marriage isn’t necessarily (I never spell that right) the 3rd party’s fault. If Getty really was unhappy in his marriage its HIS fault for not straying, not Sienna’s.

All that being said, Sienna clearly doesn’t give a flying fuck about anyone but herself. At all. And that is a massive glaring flashing character flaw. I’ve no clue how she finds all these idiots to fall in love with her…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Persistent Cat

Persistent Cat — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:34:26 +0000

I definitely believe in the term homewrecker. Stuff like this happens. It’s not the best thing to happen but it does. It’s when there are kids involved that I take issue with both parties. Yes, he cheated and he’s scum for that but good God woman, he has young children. You don’t break up families.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Syko

Syko — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:16:13 +0000

I don’t really believe in homewreckers. I think if it’s a happy home, nobody’s going to wreck it.

That said, I think Sienna’s totally self-absorbed and out to have a good time, and is not too careful about who gets hurt by her actions. Always best to just avoid those married men. Or women.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: jinx

jinx — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:35:01 +0000

Sienna and Getty are dirtbags, so that means she started doing him when his baby was just a month old. Lovely. It’s probably not going to hurt either of their careers such as they are, but it will come back to bite them in the ass at some point. Filthy behavior always has a price.

I hope Rosetta keeps him from the children, he’s a horrible father.

Report this comment as spam or abuse