Comments on: Sienna Miller sues over topless photos with Balthazar Getty

By: Pjay

Pjay — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:37:24 +0000

The only way to stop Sluttyienna and Slut dad,is through their careers. For Sluttyienna write to: Barry M.Meyer, Chairman&CFO,Warner Bros.- Warner Bros. Entertainment,Inc-4000 Warner Blvd.#505,
Burbank, CA 91522(movie in the works
“Sherlock Holmes”)& Ronald Meyer, Pres.
&COO-Universal Studios-100 Universal City,Los Angeles, CA 91608(movie in the works “Nottingham”).For Slut dad write to: Brothers&Sisters – 500 South Buena Vista St.- Stage 6 – Burbank, CA 91521.
Let these employers know you will not pay to see anything in which these two slime are involved! No Brothers & Sis- ters on TV either! Don’t forget to remind them about Sluttyienna’s interview with THE GUARDIAN, she states I hate America and love drugs be-
cause they are ******* fun! Real nice, HUH?? Pay to see this this slut? No way!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Nicola

Nicola — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:28:19 +0000

I fear I´m so often topless at the beach as Sienna Miller – maybe more often. I understand her very well that her top comes down so quick as possible. It´s nothing wrong or immoral at this not being able to keep the top on – and I think, too, Sienna Miller wouldn´t have had any problems with being photographed topless at the beach (like so many times before).

I think the core point was that she was photographed in intimate situations with a married father of four children who´s marriage broke down over it. And btw she was topless and is now thinking that it is possible to draw away this pic´s from the public on the topless-sideway – because they´re really able – in opposite to the view of her nude nipple´s – to give her a bad image.

In my eyes there should be enforced a simple rule: privacy in the private area; publicity in the public area. When a female celebrity is making it out with a married guy at a public beach than the press has a constitutional right to report about it – otherwise this freedom will pass away and we will see and read only censored news.

If Sienna Miller would have fu..ed Balthazar Getty only in her or his sleeping room it would have been a totally other case.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Trashaddict

Trashaddict — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:29:15 +0000

Sleezarama mama…..

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: czarina

czarina — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:01:00 +0000

On another thread, someone made the argument that, because Brad and Angie have sold pics of their kids, therefore they have no right to complain if someone tresspasses on their property to take pictures of their family without permission.
I was really, really angry about that–not because of it being the Jolie-Pitts, but just the principal of it.
So, now, having thought it over, much as I thouroughly dislike Sienna Miller, I will say that, while if she is going to go topless on a public beach, then any pictures taken are just too bad, but she does have the right to privacy in her home (or hotel).
(Whether this applies to the balcony as well, I would say it depends on whether the photographer tresspassed on private property to get the photo or not.)

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: duda

duda — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:55:52 +0000

Maybe Rosetta Getty should sue her for alienation of affection..

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Alli

Alli — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:34:27 +0000

It’s easier for celebrities to win cases like this in England. She might have a case with the photos taken of them inside their hotel room and on their balcony. But even those might be mitigated by the fact that she was running around a public beach for days (even after photos started coming out) with the married guy but without a top.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Megan

Megan — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:20:54 +0000

I don’t know why he got angry about this either. People assume that if you’re married to someone then you’re married to them, I would have thought he’d be eager for people to know he was separated from his wife because of all the photos of him and Sienna doing the rounds. And also, if you’re a celebrity and you don’t want pictures of your boobs on the internet, keep your clothes on in public.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Amy

Amy — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:57:23 +0000

It’s not just Getty’s wife and kids wh are involved. Wasn’t she madly in love with and LIVING WITH Rhys Ifans only a few weeks ago?! This woman is evil incarnate. Seriously, how many hearts have been broken in all this?

Also, she is very plain and always looks unwashed. I think she practices voodoo or something. Boggles the mind…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: sue

sue — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:46:02 +0000

Don’t understand the outrage??

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gg

gg — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:43:58 +0000

And there she is, grabbing his crotch, and there they are, lying down on hot black rocks, not posing. at all. How incredibly stupid and shameless can you get?

Anyway, after this beach trip, it’ll be time to pay the piper. After the expensive divorce settlement, they’ll settle into their pariah personas, get bored with each other, cheat and have a public breakup. How 4ucking boring.

Meanwhile, his spouse’s attorneys are clicking their pens at 3k a pop.

Report this comment as spam or abuse