Kim Kardashian is planning to adopt, or maybe not, whatever

lifestyle

Nothing amuses me more than when someone oh-so-gently suggests that this site is on the Kardashian family’s payroll. I wish we rolled with that kind of sell-out money. If they wanted to drop some of that Hermes money here, I would totally roll over and give Kim a tabloid-friendly spanking. CB and I have talked about the “why?” of covering the Kardashians – and we both think that we do it because it’s easy. Because they are some of the easiest celebrities to write about, and because having an opinion about something a Kardashian does or doesn’t do is like breathing. Kim wore this. Approve. Khloe did this. Don’t approve. And on and on. There’s very little thought involved.

But I’m always surprised by the sheer volume of tabloid covers the Kardashians somehow manage to get. Are the tabloids in the same boat as us? Are the Kardashians simply “easy” to somehow get/makeup a cover story? Especially at this time of year, when no one feels like working, people seem to be phoning it in. But considering the number of high-profile splits this week, you’d think someone could have managed, say, a ScarJo cover. Instead, Kim and the Kardashians took two covers – OK! Magazine and Life & Style. Both also involve BABIES too.

Kim Kardashian’s trip to South Africa on December 15 could change her life forever. Life & Style has learned that during her quick trip to promote Brutal Fruit cocktails, she plans to make time to visit the orphanage, Door of Hope — and is considering adoption.

Kim was heartbroken when a friend recently showed her a touching photo of 16 precious babies being cared for at another orphanage, Shepherd’s Keep, in South Africa.

“She couldn’t believe that all these beautiful little babies were orphans,” her friend reveals to Life & Style. “Kim was in shock — she just couldn’t believe that none of them had a mom or a dad to love them and tuck them into bed at night. That picture really changed her mind about adoption.”

She soon found out it was too far to travel from her work commitments in Johannesburg to the orphanage in Durban during her short time in the country so a determined Kim located another orphanage, Door of Hope, near where she was staying. The orphanage has a weight-sensored outdoor bin where desperate mothers leave an average of 16 babies per month.

“Kim was devastated by the statistics,” says the friend. “She contacted her people and asked them to arrange for her to visit the orphanage during her visit.”

“Kim has really come around to the idea that she could raise an orphan as her own child and surround it with the love and family that she grew up with,” the friend continues. “She’s not afraid to be a single mom anymore. She knows she has the money and the support network to raise a baby. Now she just has to find the child that she can be a mother to.”

[From Life & Style]

If Kim is considering adoption, good for her. Until she brings home a little brown baby by hook or by crook, I’ll hold any further opinions. Now, over on OK! Magazine, the focus is less about adoption and more about pregnancy… and the cover is just… ridiculous.

okmag

As the Kardashian clan gathers at mom Kris Jenner’s L.A. home for the holidays, they all have to agree: It’s been quite a year for the royal family of reality TV.

There have been highs and lows: Ubiquitous Kim Inc. earned $6 million, making Kim Kardashian 2010’s top reality star, but she also weathered painful breakups with NFL stars Reggie Bush and Miles Austin.

Khloé Kardashian Odom and NBA hoopster hubby Lamar Odom marked their first anniversary, while Kourtney Kardashian and bad-boy baby daddy Scott Disick watched son Mason, 1, grow and are about to move into a sprawling new home. Little sisters Kendall, 15, and Kylie Jenner, 13, launched modeling careers. Now, as they celebrate the holidays, the Kardashians are ready for a Christmas miracle — more babies to add to the family in 2011.

[From OK! Magazine]

I kind of hate myself for hoping that Khloe and Lamar do get pregnant in the new year – she’s been off her birth control for a while, and there are still no babies.

Also – Kim is on People Magazine’s list of “most intriguing” people of the year. Kim is “intriguing”? In what world? I would use words like “obvious” and “famewhore” and “KatFace” to describe her, but whatever.

Some pics of Kim out and about last night. Jesus, her face. It’s obscene.

48543, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - Tuesday December 14, 2010. Kim Kardashian arrives at jeweler Michael Hill's event for the Ultimate Engagement Ring contest at Lavo Club in NYC. The Keeping Up With the Kardashians star looked lovely in a silky gray cinched dress and peeptoe heels. Photograph: PacificCoastNews.com

48543, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - Tuesday December 14, 2010. Kim Kardashian arrives at jeweler Michael Hill's event for the Ultimate Engagement Ring contest at Lavo Club in NYC. The Keeping Up With the Kardashians star looked lovely in a silky gray cinched dress and peeptoe heels. Photograph: PacificCoastNews.com

48543, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - Tuesday December 14, 2010. Kim Kardashian arrives at jeweler Michael Hill's event for the Ultimate Engagement Ring contest at Lavo Club in NYC. The Keeping Up With the Kardashians star looked lovely in a silky gray cinched dress and peeptoe heels. Photograph: PacificCoastNews.com

Magazine covers courtesy of their respective sites.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

31 Responses to “Kim Kardashian is planning to adopt, or maybe not, whatever”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. dread pirate cuervo says:

    So Kim is a grown-asss woman who is “in shock” that there are orphans in the world? That right there should disqualify her from becoming a parent.

  2. Str8Shooter says:

    What is she gonna adopt? Baby Barbie?

  3. Sigh. says:

    These three pics of her in grey
    looks like someone was moving the mannequin out of the window at Barney’s to put up the Christmas display.

  4. guesty says:

    it’s the vapidness of their whole ‘thing’ that is just so inspiring! LOL. & she looks awful in these pics. aw.ful.

    oh & the ad pic for their book @ the top of the page is the cherry on top of this story. GET YOUR COPY NOW…..hahahahahahaha.

  5. maya says:

    Kaiser – It is no secret that Kim and her family has a deal with Life & Style. As for OK! Magazine, they reports are a mix of completely false or completely true.

  6. LisaMarie says:

    They were on Conan last week. I don’t watch their E! show, so maybe its just how they act normally, but I thought they were borderline rude as guests.

  7. Stubbylove says:

    “She soon found out it was too far to travel from her work commitments in Johannesburg to the orphanage in Durban…” – work commitments…LMAO!!!!

  8. gigi* says:

    hate her….loove what she’s wearing in the pics!

  9. Rio says:

    I like the line about OK! having “The only photos of Mason’s 1st birthday”. It makes it sound like those are the only photos taken of the event PERIOD- everything in their lives must only be documented by tabloid cameras! It is the Kardashian Way!

  10. Rita says:

    I would hate to think of Kim as being a parent. She’d adopt Goopy’s poodle before she’d actually adopt something that required her attention.

    This cover as well as all the other mag covers (including People) is why I think the covers are for sale to celebrities. Celeb mags are just outlets for publicity that famewhores have to have.

  11. Candice says:

    I dont like Kims new face.

  12. buenavissta says:

    I DON’T GET why someone so pretty chooses to look all fake and jacked. She’s become a caricature of herself and she was so gorgeous to start with.

  13. dawna says:

    No child deserves that ugly vapid pissed on whore as a mother!

  14. Marie says:

    I swear she and octomom are the same person.

  15. Franny says:

    whatever shes injecting our her eyes is making her have major stinkeye. i totally agree with buenovissta. she was really pretty and now its just going overboard.

  16. Jo says:

    she made a decision all ON HER OWN? No shit. I wonder what Pimp Mommy Kris had to say about that.

    Kim looks sooo much better (and younger) with no war paint.

  17. tattoofreak says:

    She totally ruined her face with all that surgery..

  18. CHICKIEBOO says:

    ANYTHING TO STAY IN THE NEWS.

  19. Nicole says:

    this bimbo is not worried about these kids being tucked in, the only thing she’s interested in is – tucking cash in her fat wallet! I just dont like these people, they have zero substance and only care about themselves! and the only reason she’s in Africia is – is to get paid to show up to some event. She makes me sick! fur wearing heartless skank!

  20. Green Is Good says:

    B*tch please. If Kim Lardassian adopted some unfortunate orphan, She would spend enough time with the kid for a photo-op by the Pappz for a famewhore “I’m a SAINT” spread in US magazine.

    Assuming Lardass can actually show genuine human emotion with her scary Joyce Wildenstein face, and Narcissistic personality.

  21. Matt says:

    The OK! cover looks like they got an intern to do a christmas vision board of the Kardashians and stick it together with childs glue.

  22. lucy2 says:

    FameWHORES.

  23. JenJen says:

    What for? To start a baby line of clothes? Looks like she had lipo on her face,added to her ass,no doubt.

  24. Emily says:

    I think Kim’s getting all this plastic surgery in order to look like her sex doll. It’s certainly not to look human, in any case.

  25. TeeTee says:

    Reggie got off easy and JUST in time, LOL

  26. Hakura says:

    It’s amazing how a cover’s ‘headline’ can write a ‘check’ that the story has no intentional of cashing, whatsoever.

    Guess which of the girls is in the process of having a child? …None of them! BUT They MAY have children at some point! ISNT THAT SHOCKING?

  27. Maritza says:

    Kim is a neat freak, I doubt this news is true. A baby would mess up her perfectly neat home. Besides the kid would steal her spotlight

  28. Laurie says:

    Kim wants to adopt an orphaned baby only to have him or her raised by a nanny since she is jet setting the world to further her famewhore career? Yeah – great plan, cat face!

  29. pam says:

    OMG! I can’t even describe the mess of this girl. I don’t usually comment on Kim, but seriously, this girl has got to stop and just go away. Her face is such a mess and all that goop on her face is gross and I’ve seen false eyelashes, but seriously, does she think it looks good on her bottom lashes! UGH

  30. You can certainly see your skills in the paintings you write. The arena hopes for even more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. Always follow your heart.