Comments on: Britney wants her kids to stay out of showbiz

By: Sandra López

Sandra López — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:34:34 +0000

No comments…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sandra López

Sandra López — Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:28:24 +0000

That’s the best decision a celebrity can ever thing about. There are better things in this world than show-business!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Christina X

Christina X — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:54:21 +0000

Good idea. She probably doesn’t want to raise her children under the limelight because she learned that being scrutinized from a very young age can be damaging.

I don’t really understand why people are so sh*tty toward Britney Spears. Sane, she probably is not but she actually seems human. At least she has a full range of emotions and a personality, unlike all the other androids.

I realized that since she’s started dating Kevin Federline, that people have been unnecessarily catty. Kevin Federline’s a dog, but most of those people only mocked her because she didn’t want up marrying Justin Timberfake or some other wealthy douche. God forbid she not marry someone famous.

Then they split up and still, everything was HER fault. While I don’t think she made the best mothering decisions, at least she seems to f-ing LIKE her children in contrast to the damned mannequins who aren’t even attached to their children.

And so what if she still talks to her parents everyday? Fifty is a lot, but like I said, at least she has one warm bone in her body unlike all the other reptiles.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: santacruz

santacruz — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:32:14 +0000

You want your kids to stay out of showbusiness? Then why sell their souls to the tabloids idiot! This woman will always be a skank

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: hello

hello — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:07:09 +0000

I have to agree with Geronimo’s take that he’s a guy who calls a spade a spade. I know a girl who is very whiney, gets her parents to bail her out of everything, even though she’s an adult and is extremely manipulative, but in their family she’s being a middle child. So…yeah.

I think with the being nice to K-Fed, it’s more in his favor to say good things about him in the press, especially if custody/alimony/ child support comes up again. They can say they were conned, were cooperative to his wants and needs, etc.

Although I am a bit confused about why he was so absent from his children’s lives, I do have to say that Lynn Spears does not seem like a woman who after the divorce would make seeing the kids easy, regardless of what the decree said. She also seemed to always be the fame centered one, and I always got the impression that Jamie was not as gung-ho about it. I don’t know. I think that a lot of this is the mom’s fault. a guy can only be as effective of a parent as the parent with physical custody will let them be, especially when one parent lives out of state, and that DOES happen in divorced families, like it or not.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: czarina

czarina — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:24:50 +0000

Cara; For myself, I might disagree with someone, but I always consider it an ‘intellectual’ disagreement–never anything personal. So, definately peace!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: cara

cara — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:35:43 +0000

Czarina…like your name. I was going on for example, when we get privey to divorces of the wealthy and elite, it is not uncommon for people with a hell of a lot less wealth then the Maloof fam, to demand 120 a year for a personal chef expence (way can’t I spell that?). But I don’t know. It’s no biggie and I certainly don’t want to riff over someting so silly. I’ll move on.

Peace.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: czarina

czarina — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:25:29 +0000

Cara; It’s hard to argue unless we knew what Jamie Spears was making before he started taking money from his daughter. I highly doubt he was making $120,000 a year, but I really don’t know.
Still…$120,000 a year…to look after your own child??? And that’s money he doesn’t have to spend on food, a place to live, a car to drive, etc.
I guess, to me, there is something wrong with a father who would abdicate responsibility for YEARS and then show up at the last minute and make a big income out of the deal.
His defending Federline also makes me distrust him.
But I definately agree with you about rooting for Britney. I am not a fan (have hardly listened to her music except if it happened to come on the radio), but I think she has been treated so much like a giant-ATM-with-legs by the people who should have been caring for her, that I truly hope she finds some kind of peace of mind.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: jaundicemachine

jaundicemachine — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:29:00 +0000

I think the biggest problem that led to Brit’s breakdown is that she never could hear the word “no” – no one offered her guidance when she was young and her ego couldn’t stand for it as she got older. That’s a problem that stems from childhood, and I can’t help but wonder how Jamie feels about being her primary caretaker now when he was absent for so many years.

I agree that Jamie has had an overall positive effect on Brit (though keeping her sedated on mood suppressants can’t hurt) but alluding to the fact that he gives in to her whims is what got Britney into this state in the first place.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: cara

cara — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:37:38 +0000

Czarina, here’s my take….I would guess that that’s maybe why he and the Mrs. got a divorce (disageements with the children/industry) and he asked for 2g a week, I would think that would be about par for being a private chef, which I believe he was for a Maloof family member. That’s less then 10g a month and many, many people make 120g a year, personal chef’s included. Remember, when Britney was at her peek, too many were making $$$ off her, I don’t think a “simple” southern man would of had much pull against that sort of machine.

Report this comment as spam or abuse