Comments on: Gwyneth Paltrow shocks animal rights activists by endorsing fur designer

By: Boyce Rasey

Boyce Rasey — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:27:23 +0000

It is insane how much the laws have transformed in regards to credit. Good info below.

By: Chip Bell

Chip Bell — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:54:04 +0000

good for her! This animal rights garbage has got to STOP. Rights for animals, rights for fetuses what the hell is wrong with people? I don’t like fur because of the look and the dry clean only aspect but boy I’m tempted to go out and buy some when I see these weirdos.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Equine Supplements

Equine Supplements — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:58:58 +0000

This is a very bold stance to take. Thanks for the info.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Louise edwards

Louise edwards — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:26:11 +0000

Well isn’t that just typical. She can’t get an acting job to save her life, couldn’t get an actor to marry her (numerous men dumped her) and then she hooks poor Chris martin into marriage by getting pregnant. She has no class , no morals and I hope this smacks her back in the face with force. She’ll never get another acting job now …not that anyone was looking for her. That’s probably why she had to take this job advertising slaughtered baby animals. LOSER!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: hello

hello — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:11:19 +0000

jj, I’m not being “high and mighty” for trying to buy meat, eggs, etc that has been treated in a kind way. I just feel like if I’m going to raise something to eat it, it should have a nice life. And buying kosher meat does this. A big tenant is respecting animals in life for the sacrifice they make for us. so boo to you.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: daisy424

daisy424 — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:51:18 +0000

Whether you like her or not the facts remain the same;
Her actions speak louder than words.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: MB Travis

MB Travis — Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:33:43 +0000

Well, I tried…

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kate

kate — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:18:35 +0000

@ jj: yes, it does still happen that animals are skinned alive…how do you think they get the skin off without ruining it? my job until 3 years ago was as cruelty investigator for the HSUS in washington dc, so don’t try to tell me about my job and what i did or did not see with my own eyes. oh and for the record, i don’t eat meat. now stick your head back up your ass and go along your merry way.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mairead

Mairead — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:45:18 +0000

Oops – I thought I’d submitted my last comment this morning – stooopid interwebs.

So… Snowblood… I’m getting the teeeeniest tiiiiiiniest inkling you don’t like Gwynnie

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mairead

Mairead — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:43:08 +0000

Sorry for biting your head off Snowblood.

To be fair it’s fairly well documented that her dad’s name was Bruce Paltrow, but you had said that she “She altered her name to sound whiter and cast a blanket over her Russian Jewish roots.” . This puts the responsibility for changing the family name on Gwyneth’s shoulders, not her father’s.

I had no clue (or interest) interest in her background, but I googled her and it does pop up in that Bruce Paltrow’s ancestors were Rabbis. But IMDb has him listed as Bruce W. Paltrow as a writer on a 1973 project, just a year after Gwyneth was born, so the family name change can’t be Gwyneth’s fault. Just as it’s not Jennifer Aniston’s fault her dad decided to change the family name from the Greek.

I’m no fan of her either, I do think but criticising her for her father’s decision is unfair. It’s as we always say in the Brangelina threads – you can dislike the woman all you like – but don’t be making stuff up about her

Report this comment as spam or abuse