Comments on: Samantha Ronson sends Perez Hilton $86K check http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/ Stylish celebrity escapism Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:50:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jeanne http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-117473 Jeanne Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:28:52 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-117473 Funny, I always guessed heroin. Ronson just always looks so unhealthy and tired with heavy shadows under her eyes. Funny, I always guessed heroin. Ronson just always looks so unhealthy and tired with heavy shadows under her eyes.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: A.J. http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114526 A.J. Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:40:18 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114526 Anything out of Perez Hilton's mouth (or written on his blog) should be taken with a rather large grain of salt. He is a dishonest, shady reprehensible scumbag. Three fourths of what he says is completely fabricated. Not only that, but good lord is his writing sloppy, juvenile, and unprofessional. Repeat after me: spellcheck is my friend. I haven't gone to his site in well over a year, and have no inclination to change that. If I wanted to read snarky, disgusting, and misinformed rubbish (not to mention the oodles of "OMG FIRST!!1!1" comments), I'd go hang out in a junior high bathroom stall. Also, he's been sued numerous times before, including Page Six who successfully won a case against him, as did another company (cannot recall their name) whom he had been plagiarizing a copywritten image from as part of his site design. One of these days, he's going to <i>really</i> piss someone off and not be so lucky when it comes to litigation. Anything out of Perez Hilton’s mouth (or written on his blog) should be taken with a rather large grain of salt. He is a dishonest, shady reprehensible scumbag. Three fourths of what he says is completely fabricated. Not only that, but good lord is his writing sloppy, juvenile, and unprofessional. Repeat after me: spellcheck is my friend.

I haven’t gone to his site in well over a year, and have no inclination to change that. If I wanted to read snarky, disgusting, and misinformed rubbish (not to mention the oodles of “OMG FIRST!!1!1″ comments), I’d go hang out in a junior high bathroom stall.

Also, he’s been sued numerous times before, including Page Six who successfully won a case against him, as did another company (cannot recall their name) whom he had been plagiarizing a copywritten image from as part of his site design. One of these days, he’s going to really piss someone off and not be so lucky when it comes to litigation.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: czarina http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114512 czarina Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:20:56 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114512 Ronson paying court costs was not a punishment. It is SOP for the person who brought suit to pay costs if they don't win the judgment. If Hilton had lost, he would have had to pay costs. I checked out Hilton once, and never again. I make my stand (feeble though it may be) by never going on his site. He is a pimple on the butt of humanity. Ronson paying court costs was not a punishment. It is SOP for the person who brought suit to pay costs if they don’t win the judgment. If Hilton had lost, he would have had to pay costs.
I checked out Hilton once, and never again.
I make my stand (feeble though it may be) by never going on his site.
He is a pimple on the butt of humanity.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: aspen http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114346 aspen Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:17:11 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114346 It's not libel if it's true. It’s not libel if it’s true.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: hello http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114333 hello Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:56:27 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114333 That's the sucky thing about free speech...it's there to protect the speech we don't necessarily like. That’s the sucky thing about free speech…it’s there to protect the speech we don’t necessarily like.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Pez http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114214 Pez Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:08:03 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114214 I'm so confused. What was Perez Hilton's cocaine doing in Lindsay's car? Did she spill it during the crash. Why did the judge think it was worth $87,000. Wouldn't that be like about 20 or 30 lbs of the stuff? I’m so confused. What was Perez Hilton’s cocaine doing in Lindsay’s car? Did she spill it during the crash. Why did the judge think it was worth $87,000. Wouldn’t that be like about 20 or 30 lbs of the stuff?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: dovesgate http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114098 dovesgate Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:34:54 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114098 I stopped reading his website when I saw him start going after Jody Foster to come out of the closet. That dude is just way too obsessed with what people do with their genetalia. I stopped reading his website when I saw him start going after Jody Foster to come out of the closet. That dude is just way too obsessed with what people do with their genetalia.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Kaiser http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114062 Kaiser Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:56:47 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114062 @KD - Yeah, I never go to his site, I only hear bits and pieces about the crap he says about certain people. I couldn't care less. But it sucks SamRo had to pay him. That's bs. @KD – Yeah, I never go to his site, I only hear bits and pieces about the crap he says about certain people. I couldn’t care less.

But it sucks SamRo had to pay him. That’s bs.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: KDRockstar http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-114050 KDRockstar Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:43:08 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-114050 Kaiser, people tried to "start rumors" (or show the other side) about PiggyHilton on a MySpace page. It showed Piggy's "looking for males" ads, a photo of him with coke-nose, and more. It was taken down about a year ago... I can't find out what happened, though I'm all for this guy getting realigned with karma. And, if out of curiosity you go to his website, you'll see that he had a huge party with some C-list celebs on Friday night. Gee, I wonder why? He's an a$$munch. Kaiser, people tried to “start rumors” (or show the other side) about PiggyHilton on a MySpace page. It showed Piggy’s “looking for males” ads, a photo of him with coke-nose, and more. It was taken down about a year ago… I can’t find out what happened, though I’m all for this guy getting realigned with karma.

And, if out of curiosity you go to his website, you’ll see that he had a huge party with some C-list celebs on Friday night. Gee, I wonder why? He’s an a$$munch.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: WTF?!?! http://www.celebitchy.com/14604/samantha_ronson_sends_perez_hilton_86k_check/#comment-113970 WTF?!?! Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:03:02 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=14604#comment-113970 No judge would throw out a case for fear that free speech on the Internet might be squelched, people. That's a slippery slope legally and journalistically that they will not start down. Tabloids and websites have been sued for years by public figures. Carol Burnett won a huge settlement against The Nat'l Enquirer decades ago when they accused her of being drunk after snapping a pic of her falling. The law is the law, and fear of "suppression of free speech on the Internet" or "that celebs would start suing every blogger they could" is not even a remote consideration. The courts cannot and would not deny individuals their legally protected right to defend themselves against libel because the Internet is too powerful. That's absolute nonsense, however long the "article" that made such claims may be. No judge would throw out a case for fear that free speech on the Internet might be squelched, people. That’s a slippery slope legally and journalistically that they will not start down.

Tabloids and websites have been sued for years by public figures. Carol Burnett won a huge settlement against The Nat’l Enquirer decades ago when they accused her of being drunk after snapping a pic of her falling.

The law is the law, and fear of “suppression of free speech on the Internet” or “that celebs would start suing every blogger they could” is not even a remote consideration. The courts cannot and would not deny individuals their legally protected right to defend themselves against libel because the Internet is too powerful. That’s absolute nonsense, however long the “article” that made such claims may be.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]>