Comments on: Sandra Bullock donated $1 million to the Red Cross for Japanese relief

By: ann

ann — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:31:13 +0000

i just like every thing that she does,or may am just in love with her.Any donating is really a cool thing. MAY GOD BLESS WITH MORE.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Annabel

Annabel — Wed, 23 Mar 2011 00:07:14 +0000

She is classy, smart, successful, independent and well respected. I think other stars should contribute as much as she has..

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: bernie

bernie — Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:44:01 +0000

what a bitch, give money to japan and the USA is in trouble. lost all respect

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kim123

Kim123 — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:56:15 +0000

Maritza- JA has been friends with Sheryl Crow( who has adopted 2 boys and is avid supporter and champion for adoption) for years why would hanging w/ SB convince her to adopt .Also how can SB be in a First Wives Club when Jesse was married before?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: CB Rawks

CB Rawks — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:46:37 +0000

Well said, nnn.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: K-MAC

K-MAC — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:48:37 +0000

GAWD, I love her!!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Newbie

Newbie — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:19:54 +0000

Yeah, yeah. That’s great. But I’m always a little peeved when celebrities do this. I don’t care who it is.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Majosha

Majosha — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:16:07 +0000

Good on Sandra! I agree that whether they announce it or not, any celeb who gives such a substantial donation should be applauded (as should anyone else who gives whatever they can). I’m sure the Japanese people for whom this money will provide much-needed assistance won’t mind if a press release was issued after the fact.

@Louise: How do you know that Sandra and Jennifer aren’t friends? Are you part of Sandy’s inner circle?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: nnn

nnn — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:13:11 +0000

Great. Donation to people in need is an act of generosity and help that should never trigger some questions about how it is done, why it is done , ect…..

I think the question to release the news or not is totally irrelevant.

It only bothers some people who don’t benefit from that donation. And quite frankly it goes down to a question of personal sensitivity/preference which has absolutely no relevance, no importance whatsoever in the grand scheme of things, nor to the aim.

Advertising it or not doesn’t lessen the act. If some people feel bothered about the way it is done, publicly or not, it only concerns their sensitivity towards the act or towards the one who does the act.

It’s their prerogative but their sensitivity/preference doesn’t weigh a dime compared to the help, relieve brought to those in needwho benefitt from that help/donation wether aired publicly or done anonymously.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: fancyamazon

fancyamazon — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:53:18 +0000

I am glad she donates. I am glad that Brangelina donate. What galls me isn’t the fact that they help out by spreading around their wealth a little, I think that’s fantastic. I am sure there are other celebrities who are donating as well, without all the press. And that is my beef, really. Why do we need a press release with the dollar amount attached? Couldn’t they just do a press conference, a few celebs together, to urge everyone to give a little, and maybe point to some reliable, trustworthy relief organizations? Another thing I don’t like is this gaga buy a bracelet thing. Where is the money going? How is it split up? I don’t trust it and so would not donate in that way.

Report this comment as spam or abuse