Comments on: Justin Theroux met “secretly” with his ex to apologize for Jennifer Aniston

By: Thelma

Thelma — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 02:17:56 +0000

Wow..the ex, Heidi is v pretty and natural looking. Definite downgrade for Justin in terms of looks to move to Jennifer Aniston, who despite tons of surgery comes across as plastic and harsh looking without the wonders of Photoshop. But I guess an upgrade for him in terms of $$$ and exposure.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: tammy

tammy — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:54:26 +0000

Justin is worser than other guys she dated. Wait and see!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: loria

loria — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:50:58 +0000

Heidi look pretier than Jen but her money is small . Jenifer Aniston ugly, old, plastic from head to toes} but her money is huge{110 millions dollars}. no wonder the star with no talent, fugly face, average body but make alot of money.she is a lucky one

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: LINA

LINA — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:22:32 +0000

WHERE IS CHELSEA HANDLERS? TELL ME WHO IS A HOMEWRECKER NOW?????

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Pam

Pam — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:20:03 +0000

WHY HE CHOOSE THE OLD, FUGLY AND PLASTIC WOMEN?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Melancholy

Melancholy — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 02:03:44 +0000

“Justin isn’t like the other guys she has met, he doesn’t pretend not to be into her”

Aahahahahaha!! Yes, all those other guys are just pretending not to be into you. Every last one of the men you’ve met in your lifetime.
How does someone become that conceited?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Atticus

Atticus — Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:29:55 +0000

Right, Josephina. I’m sure if JA had said no comment at very beginning, this entire media shitstorm never would have happened. I’m sure she wouldn’t continued to have been hounded anyway, and I’m sure that in the absence of her making any sort of comment, no one would have put words in her mouth and this whole tabloid frenzy would never have happened. Riiiight.

Laughternrain, the court of public opinion was far different in the case of Sandra Bullock. She was divorcing a guy who had been having numerous, blatant affairs with random floozies in the back room of his bike shop. There’s nothing TO say about that. There’s no argument to be had because who, besides Kat Von Dee, is going to argue Jesse’s side?

Look, JA is no saint. But she’s no sinner either. You don’t get why I can’t see how manipulative she is and how she’s obviously pining over Brad. I don’t get why you insist that she is. In the public mind, Brad & Angelina and JA will always be linked but that is because the tabloids love to create this non-existing Bermuda Triangle. 6 years after their divorce, you still hear about it in the tabloids. It’s only been 18 months since the Jesse James scandal broke and yet the tabloids hardly ever talk about it anymore. The tabloids love their Bermuda Triangle and it still sells their magazines, and we’re not even arguing over real people here – we’re arguing over the characters created by that tabloid fiction. Unless you are a personal friend of all three involved, and have first hand knowledge of every conversation and interaction they’ve ever had, you’re basing your opinion on what your interpretation of the media coverage has been. As am I.

I’ve been with my husband for 15 years, we’ve been married for 9 and have two kids. In conversations with friends, do ex-boyfriends’ names come up? Of course. Does it mean I still have a thing for them? No. It means they were part of my formative years and who I am now has something to do with how I worked through the experiences with them. I don’t see why it’s any different for people in the public eye.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Laughternrain

Laughternrain — Sat, 16 Jul 2011 06:12:13 +0000

ITA Josephina. Unfortunately there are none so blind as those who *refuse* to see. All one needs to do is compare Aniston’s behaviour to Reese Witherspoon and Sandra Bullock – who were ACTUALLY cheated on. Neither gave an interview denigrating their husbands. And look look at Sandra – not just cheated on, but her husband risked her life with countless women. Seen Classy Sandra throw any pity parties? NO! She moved out, divorced him and didn’t look back, and has not even UTTERED his name since. Now THAT, is pure CLASS. Class and dignity. Unfortunately Aniston burned her bridges by the fact she handled it so very badly. She acted and still acts, like a petulent, vindictive child. The EVIDENCE is there for even the simplist person to see. She has no dignity or class and if its one reason that many no longer root for her, its the way she has handled herself and her constant need for revenge, vindication and sympathy. She is totally classless and an example of how NOT to handle a breakup. The classy ande very dignified and poised Sandra is an example how TO handle it, which is why she has gained supporters, and not *lost* them.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: donna the brat!

donna the brat! — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:20:15 +0000

pretty woman like heidi well soon meets the man she deserves to have!not just like justin the great jerk!
well jen is not really that beautiful!
unlike heidi that her beauty is skin deep!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Josephina

Josephina — Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:40:42 +0000

Atticus-

There have definitely been MUCH MORE than a couple of comments from Jen, starting with last week’s interview on the Actor’s Studio. If you go to past blogs on CB you will see that many of us have provided the dates for you to read. It is almost rare that she does not bring Brad’s name up. Again, this is all by CHOICE and she is making poor choices.

She chooses not to talk about Justin, the man in her life, but she still chooses to refer to Brad in interview?

Surely there are recent men in her life and events in her life that she can draw on to demonstrate enlightenment, make a point or illustration, … right? Or did life really begin when she met Brad?

REPEAT: She stated that she did not want the marriage to end. She was the fool that went on Oprah and blabbered “I’m shocked, the whole world is shocked!” when Oprah asked her opinion of the pictures taken of Maddox, Angie and Brad on a beach in Africa. She could have said no comment. There was a very strong public interest to hear her side and she could have shut it down by remaining silent or declining further comment. Instead, she answers any questions about Brad, offers opinions about Brad’s new life, reminds people that she was married to Brad, and cries upon news of Angie’s pregnancy, and screams at the ocean.

Angie makes a reference to her work in the movie Mr. and Mrs. Smith, trigger-happy Aniston misinterprets her meaning and calls her uncool. That same year Brad, the ex-husband, states that he fell in love with Angie during the filming and
Aniston says nothing. Yet you think she is over him.

If Aniston is not over trying to compete with/denigrate/ridicule Angie, then she is not over Brad.

Report this comment as spam or abuse