Jennifer Aniston takes Justin Theroux to Hawaii, not Cabo

64308pcn_anniston02

It’s a whole new Jennifer Aniston! Instead of taking her latest lover to her beloved rental in Cabo San Lucas (I believe she’s still renting Joe Francis’s place), Aniston and Justin Theroux decided to vacation in Hawaii instead. SHOCKING! Will Cabo be lonely without Aniston? How will we know that she and Theroux are for real unless we see photos of their tequila-soaked bodies sunbathing in the bright Mexican sun? Ah, well. We’ll just have to make due with Hawaii – you can see a photo of their arrival here.

Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux got lei’d! On Sunday, the hot and heavy duo landed on a private island in Hawaii — with traditional purple leis around their necks — for a vacation.

With the 42-year-old actress’ promotional duties for Horrible Bosses over, she and her man can soak up some R & R in paradise. Another reason to celebrate: Theroux turns 40 on August 10.

As it turns out, Theroux’s Hawaiian getaway was originally planned with Heidi Bivens, his longtime girlfriend of 14 years. Over the winter, Theroux and fashion stylist Bivens, 35, hit the island of Kauai for surfing, horseback riding, snorkling and more. And in March, Bivens gushed to pals about returning for the summer.

“She was really psyched about a Hawaii trip they’d taken and was thinking they should get property,” an insider told Us Weekly. But Theroux abruptly ended the relationship that month and soon stepped out with Aniston, his costar in the upcoming comedy Wanderlust.

[From Us Weekly]

Justin Theroux is a Leo! We talked about that the last time. I think a Leo is a good sign for Aniston, who is an Aquarius. Leos are grounded, loyal, communicative. That’s good for her. As for Justin originally planning to take his girlfriend of 14 years to Hawaii… poor Heidi. I hope she gives an interview sometime soon. I want to hear what she has to say.

In addition to this Hawaiian celebration, Aniston also threw one last party at her Beverly Hills home, which she just sold for some ungodly sum ($30 mill-plus). A source tells People, “Jen had a party at her Beverly Hills house Friday night – a little going away party since she plans on spending so much more time in New York, She just wanted to have one more great get together with friends at the house before she moved out.”

fp_7629690_big_horriblebosses_13_22

fp_7568950_anistonjennifer_handprint_fp10_39_48

Photos courtesy of Fame and Pacific Coast News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

90 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston takes Justin Theroux to Hawaii, not Cabo”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Ashley says:

    Jennifer is an Aquarius = Feb 11 is her bday

  2. Michelle says:

    She’s not a Capricorn, she is an Aquarius

  3. Michelle says:

    ps capricorn is an earth sign.

  4. lola says:

    that dark tie is definitely for a taller man. And those shoes deserve a tuxedo, not skinny jeans.
    Overall his look is tragic. Are they going to the morgue?

  5. Kaiser says:

    Fixed it, sorry.

  6. Miss Marie says:

    Fire(Leo)and Water(Aquarius) are not good together. Water douses the flames everytime because of their controlling ways! No quicker way to kill the flame!

  7. lucy2 says:

    Are there any “private islands” in Hawaii? I know there’s one, but no one is allowed to go there.

    I still can’t believe she sold that house for THAT much!

  8. Peck says:

    Last time a man dressed like this was 1980. The Blues Brothers.

  9. Rose says:

    What’s going on with her underarm? However her face looks good.

  10. Pity says:

    Why would she give an interview. If she says she is sad and upset people will turn on her and say she is pathetic and could not keep a man. Remember what happened to Jennifer.

    She also said that she would not talk if they didn’t. Trust they will not talk. Jen won’t mention Heidi’s name. Unlike Angelina who brought it up in an interview and said she would like to have a sit down with Jennifer. That was to well “uncool”. Jen would never be that rude.

  11. WTF? says:

    Aquarius is not a water sign, those are Scorpio,Pisces and Cancer.

  12. Rita says:

    Aniston = Aquarius, an AIR sign. Does not go well at all with sef-centered Leo. Too independant for Leos expect all to be loyal subjects.

    This is clearly a physical attraction, will fizzle soon.

  13. horizonte says:

    yikes, i saw this and remembered reading this article where heidi writes about going to hawaii with theroux
    http://www.refinery29.com/great-escapes-stylist-we-love-heidi-bivens-says-aloha-from-kauai?page=1

    must be soooo annoying to have your ex and his new gf’s every move all over the internet, all the time.

  14. dfsdg says:

    Her face does not look good at all! She has a very odd shaped face with bad features. She is plain, not beautiful.
    Big chin, big wide nose, small eyes, thin lips, no cheek bones, puffy face…just a hard face to look at.

  15. busy bee... says:

    Aquarius is an air sign, not a water sign. Aquarius is known as the “Water Bearer,” but it is ruled by the element of Air.

    Fire: Leo, Sagittarius, Aries
    Air: Aquarius, Libra, Gemini
    Water: Pisces, Scorpio, Cancer
    Earth: Taurus, Capricorn, Virgo

  16. jamminatorr says:

    Hahahaha he looks like Dick Nixon here.

  17. BELLA says:

    Why isnt he taking her???

  18. BELLA says:

    Hope she gets prego and hurry`s up already…so tired of her.

  19. Very Telling says:

    I saw the pic at popsugar.com Justin in his boots and Jen with her hand on her stomach. I can write the tabloid headlines- Baby makes three.@Pity Angelina has never brought up Jen ,the interviewer brought her name up in 2006 Vogue interview.This is about Jen and her man why bring up Angelina?

  20. spinner says:

    Aquarius & Leo together are ideal. I will not go into detail as to what I have found. Don’t want another thrashing like I got the last time.

  21. Hanh says:

    So the Sugar Momma is taking him to Hawaii instead of him taking her since its “his place”? Heidi will never say anything to the public. She’s a stylist and Jen could kill her career.

    I don’t think Jen wants to be pregnant and mess up her body she works so hard to maintain. I think she’d go for adoption if she wanted children.

  22. olivia says:

    I saw the pic and I like that he is carrying everything, including her handbag. Very gentleman like.

  23. nemera says:

    @rose..

    it is age. Women need to remember that age will hit under the arms, neck/under the chin and hands never ever lie. These areas can not be hidden or exercised out. She is just getting that puffy soft spot that women get.

    I guess she is trying to change it up heading to Hawaii. I wonder if the endorsement police will make a fuss about the product placement.

    and it just took 10 comments before the mention..

  24. gloaming says:

    Planned a holiday with your prior GF?
    Worried about losing your deposit?

    Don’t worry mang- Just bring the new (more successful) one.

    Thrifty Theroux!!

  25. kira says:

    Hawaii is an interesting choice. Just 2 months ago, Justin’s longtime girlfriend did an interview, talking about her “HAPPY” trip to Hawaii with Justin THIS winter. SO, Justin goes to Hawaii with 2 women in 1 year? Nice. He sounds like a player, if you ask me.

    http://www.refinery29.com/great-escapes-stylist-we-love-heidi-bivens-says-aloha-from-kauai

    Here’s a quote from Heidi: “Here I am throwing a shaka sign in the back of a pick-up truck… can you tell how happy I am?”

    AND, are they aiming for the “RUB IT IN” award of the year? Must really burn for Heidi. Someone is missing a “sensitivity chip.” 🙁

    EDIT: ooops, I just saw someone beat me to the same link. Oh well, I’m still keeping it.

  26. Valleygirl says:

    I agree that Justin/Jen shouldn’t have gone to Hawaii so soon after he went with his gf, when there are a million other places (Bahamas, etc) they could afford to go. But I gotta say, the constant comments on Justin’s wardrobe are getting old. He dresses how he wants to dress, to make him happy. He was with a stylist for 14 years, so if he wanted any clothing advice, he would have asked.

  27. Katherine says:

    Kaiser, forget Heidi talking about this break up. She seems to have some dignity about her. Now maybe her loyal friends will dish. From what I’vre read Heidi was the beloved and popular one in that former coupling.

    I see that Aniston fans have already started a trash talking campaign about Heidi by spreading the rumor that Heidi was already seeing someone else before Justin unceremoniously dumped her. They have her hooked up woth the very successful and well liked fashion designer Rogan Gregory who she has been friends and colleagues with for years.

    All I can say is that if my career required that I be out and about socially in NYC on a continual basis and my partner of 14 years just humiliated me publicly I’d be damn sure I wasn’t seen alone like some pathetic victim. I’d have my loyal friends around and running interference for me as well.

    This really is rubbing Heidi’s face in the break up. The break up just happened and similar to reports from NYC that Jennifer and Justin have already been frequenting Heidi’s favorite places, these 2 just have to vacation where Heidi and Justin just spent – in Heidi’s eyes – a romantic vacation. Even worse that this vacation had been planned for many months as one for Heidi and Justin.

    He’s a creep with it seems some “personality” issues – to put it kindly. I wonder how much nonsense Heidi had to put up with over the years in the name of love. You can rest assured that Jennifer will never be as supportive or tolerant.

  28. brin says:

    Not sure about Jennifer and Justin but I love all these astrology posts!

  29. Anon says:

    “As to Pity’s bs, it was in fact, and still is, Aniston that brings up Brad and Angelina (rather like her fans) every chance she gets.”

    I would love to see some links to where Aniston has brought up their names when not asked directly. The last time she commented at all (when asked) was 3 years ago.

    As for US Weekly’s story – sounds like BS as per usual. Saying you would like to return and actually planning a vacation there are two different things (if she even said this to begin with). Did Theroux and Bivens somehow win the lotto – otherwise there is no way they were flying via private plane and to a private island there. Therefore the vacation was not something he and Bivens were planning at all. Plus do they somehow own all rights to Hawaii? Aniston has been there several times herself – most recently when filming JGWI. Since it’s a place they both have said they like, why shouldn’t they go there together now?

  30. kira says:

    Riiight. Aniston recently brought up her divorce in an interview. She was asked about her movie, The Break-Up, and then, she went into her divorce. Last year, she also did the “Jen: 5 Years After Brad” interview. Only CNN and a number of websites have called her out on her attention-getting ploys, which includes name-dropping exs, taking semi-nude pics and using her romances for self-promotion.

    http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/07/jennifer-aniston-break-brad-pitt-actors-studio-james-lipton-video

  31. bluhare says:

    Lucy2: Yes, I think there is a private island off the coast of Kauai. Nisomething, I can’t remember which, but it isn’t open to the public, that i do know.

    So if they’re on Kauai, they’re probably at Princeville on the North shore. Tres tres nice.

  32. Jana says:

    Anon what difference does it make if she was asked or not? Because Pity didn’t make that allowance when they said Angelina would like to have a sit down discussion with Aniston when in fact, she was ASKED about and all she said was yes. So if you concede for one, you must concede for the other. The fact is that Angelina has NOT ONCE referenced Aniston off her own bat, contrasted to Aniston who has. Aniston is always referencing Brad, Angelina or the breakup in some way, shape or form. The last time was when she appeared on Inside The Actor’s Studio when she brought up her breakup with Brad.

  33. In the Hawaii pic she looks prego,or maybe she ate too many peanuts on the plane.

  34. alex says:

    I think the chick is pregnant and well good for her

  35. Chloe says:

    Sensitivity chips must be falling all over the place.

  36. abritabroad says:

    @ anon, well said. It’s nice to see a reasonable person on these threads. If this was a story about Brad cheating with his PA, then the same people eating this up with a spoon would be of the defense. It’s a tabloid, and a simple holiday without the scandal of his ex-girlfriend also visiting Hawaii just isn’t juicy enough.

    @ kira, saying she used her own relationship woes to help inform her performance is hardly bringing up Pitt, and she didn’t write the people magazine cover title.

    And the New York Times has called out Jolie for setting up ‘candid’ pictures of her and Maddox playing in a park after her and BBT broke up, and for making deals with People magazine to print only positive stories on the family (and no use of the Brangelina portmanteau!) in exchange for multiple exclusive baby pics. It’s called image control, and pretty much everyone in Hollywood does it.

    And of course Aniston has referenced Brad on occasion. He was her husband, she has every right to talk about him. Why would Jolie talk about JA ever?

  37. Zombie Nurse says:

    As a native of Hawaii, the only private island I can think of is Ni’ihau, which is off of Kauai. However, it’s not a vacation spot. It’s a private island where Hawaiian is still spoken and people try to maintain the traditional Hawaiian lifestyle. Tourists and vacationing haoles aren’t exactly welcome.

  38. the original bellaluna says:

    @ spinner – Well I love your insight! I’m a Taurus, with an Aquarius hubs (and daughter); a Virgo son (and mother); a Gemini son; an Aries BFF; and a Leo ex. (CB, spinner can e-mail me directly if she chooses – I don’t want her attacked.)

  39. JP Fan says:

    When will this ugly talentless, JP coattail riding THING go away… I sure hope WanderBUST is the nail in her coffin of her disgusting movies! I sure hope this dude with short legs and hair plugs sticks around long enough after the WanderBust… I personally think, looks wise it is match made in heaven! Ugly manipulator buys a D listed ugly stumpy, balding short legged dude who only hooked up with her because no one even knew who the heck he was…yep two fameho’s are perfect together! And now Jenny the LIAR is the “homewrecker” but no blogs or tabloids are going there are they why??? This bitch which the bitch stayed in the limelight by using the JP’s and Angie as a homewrecker for SEVEN f’iing years even though she and CC said Brad did NOT CHEAT in her disgusting interview in 2005… But Huvane thought, that was the only way he could keep the talentless ho in the lime light was to coattail ride the JP’s and send his othe clients like Chelsea the gross, disgusting ho to do her other clients work! PATHETIC!……. Awwww poor ugly duckling after 3 nose jobs, cheek implants, botox and lips being pumped… you can NOT even compete with Angie’s tiny TOE-NAIL!!!!!
    Gaah, what a loser, she makes me sick…pathetic!
    I hope JustJen lasts and Huvane and Justin waste ALL her unearned millions away!

    This 43 year old woman is a disgrace to all the woman who are empowered, work hard, who are talented. This womans MOP is “manipulation” PERIOD!

  40. Eve says:

    What I find amusing is that there are people who actually believe in astrology.

    The idea is endearing though: finding the perfect someone based on a strange and mystical compability even before we meet. I’m a Scorpio, by the way (and many people have guessed that by just looking at me — although I think that has to do with my naturally arched eyebrows and the fact people say Scorpios are “intense”) and I’m told the perfect matches for me are: Cancer, Taurus, Capricorn, Pisces and Scorpio itself (lie!…I’m totally googling this as I post).

    EDIT @ Chloe:

    Sensitivity chips must be falling all over the place.

    LMAO!!! Let’s hope they don’t stumble upon them, right?

  41. Jana says:

    abritabroad, one thing you omitted to say is that that NYT article was claimed a hoax and in fact they printed a RETRACTION. So therefore that “article” is null and void and irrelevant.

  42. Anon says:

    “Anon what difference does it make if she was asked or not?….So if you concede for one, you must concede for the other. The fact is that Angelina has NOT ONCE referenced Aniston off her own bat, contrasted to Aniston who has.”

    @Jana: That’s the difference – that some on here want to concede for Jolie and not Aniston as you yourself said. Jennifer has never brought up Pitt or Jolie without being asked, and neither have they. So if people are going to use that to absolve Jolie then it has to work the same way for Aniston as well.

    @Kira: She didn’t do an interview with People last year – the mag used old quotes as well as new quotes from a minor co-star of hers in The Bounty Hunter to put that article together – she didn’t sit down and do an interview and talk about her life after Pitt with them. And if you think she truly wanted an article out there about her called “Jen: 5 Years After Brad” I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

    Likewise she didn’t bring up Pitt in the ITAS interview – she was asked why she chose to do the film and about her process as an actress and she vaguely referenced the fact that she “was slightly familiar on the topic” and used her experiences to fuel her performance (of break-ups – she never linked that to Pitt, you and others who want to keep the triangle alive did).

  43. newtsgal says:

    Leo’s are grounded, loyal, and communicative?
    Would someone mind calling my mother and tell her that, cuz she is anything but those things.

  44. Anonymous says:

    “When will this ugly talentless, JP coattail riding THING go away… I sure hope WandeN.BUST is the nail in her coffin of her disgusting movies! I sure hope this dude with short legs and hair plugs sticks around long enough after the WanderBusst… I personally think, looks wise it is match made in heaven! Ugly manipulator buys a D listed ugly stumpy, balding legged dude and being a “homewrecker” which the bitch stayed in the limelight by using the JP’s and Angie……. Awwww poor ugly duckling after 4 nose jobs, cheeck implants, botox and lips being pumped… you can NOT even compete with Angie’s tiny TOE-NAIL!!!!!”

    I counted 20 insults in just that first paragraph alone. That is what you call spewing insults – that was a projectile vomit of insults. Did you breathe between them?

    Also, I count a total of 6 exclamation points – 5 all at the end of one sentence. You must be exhausted.

  45. Lucky Charm says:

    I doubt she will get pregnant now, she wouldn’t risk mixing her pre-surgery features with Justins, lol! But only because she’s too shallow to have the public confirm that she’s had work done and their bio kid would not be very cute. And then the comparisons to certain natural blond haired, blue eyed moppets would be unfavorable to her brown haired, brown eyed one. Not fair to the kids, but then it would be no contest anyway.

  46. And Justin,this is where I used to scream at the ocean..

  47. Jana says:

    Now you know how it feels, Anonymous.

  48. abritabroad says:

    Hi Jana, I can find no evidence of a retraction (sorry a RETRACTION) for the NYT article, and it’s actually still on their website-

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/media/21angelina.html

    I’ll happily stand corrected if you can provide a link to back up your claim that they printed a retraction for that obviously defamatory “article”?

  49. RobN says:

    So apparently you have to rule out an entire state to vacation in when you break up with somebody? It’s not the same room in the same resort; it’s a STATE, people. They’ve got the vote and congresspeople and everything.

  50. kira says:

    @ kira…she didn’t write the people magazine cover title.
    _______________________________________
    Maybe, she did write it? Who knows.

    Nevertheless, she does endorse it. If she didn’t like the title, then why not change it? Or, are you going to tell me that this wealthy,
    HUGE actress is absolutely powerless when it comes to the evil machinations of those softies, People magazine? Riiight. This the same woman whose representative talks to People every other week, recently making announcements that her dog died, that she received a tattoo for her dog, that she is buying a place in NY, that she is eating dinner in New York with her new cheater boyfriend at such-and-such restaurant, etc. It’s obvious she uses them for press. If they displeased her, then why continue a relationship with them? That makes no sense. Her PR is well-known for controlling her image. Her PR even emailed Perez Hilton to get him to be nicer to Aniston. She is not a victim. For people to say that it’s “the media” that does this to her, as if she’s some innocent little child, is completely implausible. I don’t buy that BS at all.

    And, she keeps bringing up Brad because it gets her attention. This is the same woman who had her birthday party in Cabo and invited People magazine to take pictures, and Billy Bush to interview her. She also invited Gerard Butler and coyly talked about their
    “relationship,” amping up those romance rumors. To me, it’s pretty obvious that she uses her co-stars, her exs, and whatever else she can for the added attention. And, many people have said the same (CNN, Kaiser, Pajiba, D-listed, you name it). I remember one reporter even called her “the tick” because she feeds off of others for added fame. Now, that’s funny! 😮

  51. Pal says:

    Standing ovation for kira! 🙂 🙂 🙂

  52. N.D. says:

    I think she must have lent her sensitivity chip to someone. Brad maybe? You know, as a last stab, after that five years long spring cleaning of hers?

  53. Jana says:

    Not exactly a retraction but it exposed the lies of Brooks Barnes and his manipulative agenda. In short, the ‘article’ was no more than a Star tabloid article skewed to smear Angelina. Unfortunately, people fell for it.

  54. Violet says:

    My, my, my. Jen has certainly been bending over backwards for someone she’s supposedly only been dating a brief time.

    She’s gotten Justin in at CAA, lined up work for him, introduced him around Hollywood, put a very expensive roof over his head, and is now treating him to a luxury vacation.

    Jen is turning out to be the best sugar mama ever. I guess she’s finally realized the only way she can hang onto a man is if she buys him lock, stock and barrel.

  55. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    @RobN LOL There is no actual reasoning with this whole thing. This gonna be a fight forever…in the past few months I haven’t really heard or been offended by anything Jen has done. The only time I had real beef with Jen is when she called Angie “Uncool.” I also blamed her for the Chelsea rant, which come on, we know she was kinda involved in that. We all know Jen’s BS tactics.

    Its possible Jen has never gotten over her divorce. I never really thought that until I watched Real Housewives of New York and Sonja was bawling over her divorce. Sonja got divorced in 2005…its 2011. Some people just don’t move on that quickly. Jen may dislike Angelina the rest of her life, even when she is happy, married to great a guy, and has babies. Jen will probably always make snide comments and be passive aggressive.

    What I can’t get is how this isn’t boring to people already on both sides. I use to get a high arguing on the topic but its become repetitive, I have built up a huge tolerance to it. Angelina is so happy with Brad and the kids, they are so solid there is nothing Jen or JP bashers could do to ruin that. Do people need to get their facts straight? Hell yea and I am more than happy to tell anyone who utters it that Angelina never wrecked anyone’s home. However this whole back and forth thing is tiring. If Jen isn’t saying snide comments and is boning someone then let the girl be…there is no evidence of an affair between Justin and Jen…if there was I would say have at her but there isn’t any.

  56. P.J. says:

    Wow, $30 million for a house! Every so often we get a glimpse of just how rich the rich really are. I don’t understand why our government won’t tax them.

  57. abritabroad says:

    Hi again Jana, yeh that’s not even similar to a retraction. It’s an op-ed piece by a public editor who disagreed with a writer’s article. That’s a public editors prerogative. Chris Hoyt no longer works for the times in any capacity, but Barnes still does. He’s hardly a tabloid journalist and has no interest in writing lies about a movie star. Where as a biased fan might have an interest in protecting their favourite actress from some perceived insult.

    I have nothing against Jolie, I actually quite like her, but I also see the machinery in motion. She’s not stupid, she knows exactly what’s printed about her, and as any intelligent celebrity would do, she manipulates the press when she can to promote a positive image.

    Anyway, I’ll await a link to that retraction you promised. Otherwise the entire article stands, despite you’re not approving of it.

  58. kira says:

    Pal: Thanks for that. 🙂

    Also, I used to be roommates with a reporter who did celeb interviews for LA Times and other rags. She would tell me about them. Basically, they’re fake. Almost every question is approved in advance by the actor or the PR. Actors then prepped their responses in advance. She called it a well-choreographed dance of fakery. Also, final mark-ups and pictures are approved, too.
    Actors will revoke anything they feel is unflattering–no matter how minor! There are no suprises. And, if they hate what you write, it can mean no more access to that celeb, which often means your job. Most reporters are expendable. Actors know this, hence a lot of butt-kissing interviews. But, I thought this was common knowledge? It seems odd that people insist that Aniston is somehow above this? I don’t pretend to know her, or exactly what goes on in her interviews, it just seems unlikely that it’s always the media’s fault with her press, and never her own machinations. Just not plausible to me, anyways. 🙂

  59. Cheyenne says:

    jamminatorr: Hahahaha he looks like Dick Nixon here.
    ============================================

    OMG, all this time I’ve been wondering who he reminds me of and you totally nailed it.

    Is this guy her lapdog or what? Is he supposed to be Norman’s replacement? He should be taking her, not the other way around.

  60. Zara says:

    @ Pity, she did NOT bring up Aniston, Jonathan Van Meter, the interviewer did.

    Here is the full excerpt of what has your knickers in a twist.From the Jan 2007 Vogue interview.

    Of course, the elephant here in the room with us is Jennifer Aniston. When I finally find the nerve to ask if they have ever talked or met, Jolie says, at first, no. But then a minute later, she interrupts me. “But…so… you asked me if I had ever met Jennifer and I said no. I did but it was not a proper meeting. We’ve, like, passed each other and said hi briefly, shook hands. But not a real sit-down-and-talk kind of meeting”.
    Do you imagine that happening at some point?
    “That would be her decision, and I would welcome it”.

    http://www.joliesdragon.com/angel_dolls/Vogue_Jan2007/pages/06.htm

  61. sassy says:

    aquarius is actually an air sign. air makes the fire sign stronger. my husband is an air sign, and I am a fire sign. we have alot of fun together! hope this time it works out for her…

  62. Pity says:

    Zara – what could she has said instead? How about I have no comment. Or I don’t comment on my personal life. Actually she could not have said the last one because she always does comment on her personal life and the personal life of her kids. But no celeb has to answer every question put forward to them. Your excuse is weak. She could have very easily keep her mouth shut. If Jen ever commented on Heidi I would lose all respect for her forever.

  63. Zara says:

    @ Pity, she had nothing to hide. I’m still at a loss as to what was so terrible about Angelina said. God knows, the media and plenty of other people were and are still trying to portray her as the villain.

  64. M.K. says:

    Abritabroad you must not know anything about the public ed . it is their job to respond to complaints and comments from the public and to monitor the paper’s journalistic practices, in order words to correct or call attention to bias, misinformation and misrepresentation. The fact that Hoyt is no longer the public editor is of no consequence since it is a 2-year position. His opinion carries far more weight than a celebrity reporter.

  65. Runs with Scissors says:

    @Pity to Zara: “your excuse is weak.”

    Actually, not so much. Looks like Zara pretty much kicked your ass in the logic department.

    Confirming that you’ve met someone and saying you’d talk to them if they want to is a FAR cry from blathering endlessly through tears, screaming at the ocean, making jokes about your exes’ children and admitting that you keep old phone messages of your ex husband.

    http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/46993/jennifer-aniston-saves-old-phone-messages-from-brad-pitt

    Aniston could say ‘no comment’ but she never does because she knows she’d be Lisa Kudrow (gasp, the horror!) if she didn’t constantly exploit the Jolie-Pitt family.

  66. Honey says:

    FYI, a public editor’s job is to act in the ethical interest of the paper and act on behalf of the public to question things, and this editor had only an issue with the claims that People magazine played ball with the Jolie-Pitts, because Barnes sources were off the record and could not be verified.

    “There is no question that Jolie has a history of trying to manipulate coverage of her, and it is frustrating to Barnes and his editor, Bruce Headlam, that some of the people speaking to me would not speak to him when he was reporting the story.”

    His opinion carries some weight, but it’s not a retraction as another poster pointed out. And the paper stood by the story.

  67. anonymous says:

    BELLA: Why is JA taking Justin Theroux and not the other way around? That’s the ten million dollar question. Why is Jennifer Aniston so hard up for companionship she has to keep a man? Elizabeth Taylor, and Roseanne Barr did it with a number of suitors and husbands who had little or no assets, but they were older women who had passed their prime. For Jennifer Aniston to be keeping a man at her age is beyond the pale who would imagine that this is how miss thang would end up. At the time of Elizabeth Taylor’s death she was still sending that Fortensky ex a monthly check. I read on anothet sight that Justin Theroux lived with his girl friend in a small apartment for years, now apparently he is going to move into a mansion that cost millions of dollars via JA, he is a male gold digger, JA cannot take him to Cabo been there with too many other suitors,she deserve to be laughed at for years she has been bad talking Angelina in Hollywood.

  68. Anonymous says:

    Did any of Brangelina’s fans finish highschool? Did Brangie?

  69. M.K. says:

    @ Honey, Where is the link that shows that the Times stands by the AJ article? For those unfamiliar with the process, retractions are usually in small type and buried deep inside a publication, and are usually no more than one line.

    What bothered me in the exchange between abritabroad and Jana is abritabroad’s dismissal of the public editor, a person who plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of the paper. The actual article about Jolie didn’t seem offensive to me since we all probably agree that public image is a crucial part of being a celebrity. Because of this, there is an expectation that the person will want to control as much as possible his/her image. I believe the conflict between the JA and AJ people has to do with the way image management is done. The AJ supporters believe that JA relies on the Pitt-Jolie family (in a way that is unflattering to them) to create an image of her that is not quite true.

    And as you noted, the public editor concern did have to do with problems of using anonymous sources to dispute on-the-record sources.

  70. amcarcamo says:

    he looks SO MUCH BETTER without the beard! They form a really cute couple! I’m so happy for her!

  71. Karma says:

    i cant believe people are so stupid to fall for this fake pr relationship. open your eyes! it will all be over and done with in a few months. trust that.

  72. LuckyLilGem says:

    She does look pregnant in that arrival to Hawaii photo with Justin. Hopefully his ex girlfriend wasn’t also hoping to get preggo this year with him.

  73. Honey says:

    A public editors job is to quibble, to play devils advocate, and to prevent the paper from printing hearsay and unconfirmed reports. He did his job here. But that is not a retraction, the newspaper never issued one, even one line hidden in the back pages would have been picked up by someone along the way.

    I think that the fact that the article is still available online is proof enough that the Times stood by the story.

    A lot of sources are off the record, journalist go to prison to protect unnamed informants for gods sake.

    What bothered me is not the dismissal of the public editor by abritabroad, but the fact that people are acting as though it’s the same as a retraction. It’s not. It’s just protecting the paper by questioning the content.

  74. nemera says:

    @Anonymous

    google is your friend. For someone that spots off so much about them one would think you would be more informed.

    Angie graduated at age 16. She later trained and performed at the Lee Strasberg Theatre Institute, where she was seen in several stage productions. She worked as a professional model in London. She undertook some film studies at New York University and later joined the renowned Met Theatre Group in Los Angeles.

    Brad Pitt attended the University of Missouri, where he majored in journalism with a focus on advertising. He occasionally acted in fraternity shows. He left college two credits short of graduating to move to California. Before he became successful at acting
    ************

    Now could you please make a list of your accomplishment. I would be interested in know.

    I have BA/MA working on another BA.

    Sorry to the Aniston fans for this comment, but sometimes some things should be addressed.

  75. Barbara says:

    @newtsgal; My son is a handsome Leo, his father, my ex also a Leo, I am a cancer. My son goes thru woman after woman. I have never seen him be loyal to any of them. True he is approached by many women all the time, and gets distracted from whomever he is with at the time. I have repeatedly told him he could learn to say no!!

  76. Caribbean says:

    AJ has no ajent of publicist….The little that she does (if at all) to control her image is very very little compared to those Stars and Actors who use publicist (especially) to drop and block stories about themselves.
    I congratulate her if she uses any media or paps instead of them using her!!!

  77. Cheyenne says:

    Anonymous: Did any of Brangelina’s fans finish highschool? Did Brangie?
    ============================================

    One of the silliest questions I’ve ever seen on this blog. Angie graduated HS at age 16. Brad has three and a half years of college behind him. As for their fans, I can’t speak for anyone but myself, and I have a graduate degree.

    How about you? I can’t wait to see your creds. 🙄

  78. siska says:

    AJ has an agent..she also used to be a member of CAA..but 2007 she quit..and now she join the director and screenwrting agency..she has manager/personal assistance with the job handling her image..(she might proudly saying that she didnt have a publicist..but she has team who did the same thing with different job title..and she did admit she is a control freak..she didnt trust people easily)
    This woman is smart ..she is one step ahead of most of her piers..she used international matters to enhance her profile overseas..she even choose Financial times to do her interview who didnt have anything to do with financial matter…and she is good on deflection tactic to enhance her image..the humanatarian,adopting,PDA or kids pr with shocking interview…
    Either she was involve or not..the fall out of Jen married which actually made jen image was the guilty one cause of her childless position agaist Brangie with 6 kids..its one smart but kniving move!!!

    anyway..if you accuse jen with this man just a fake one..why believe she broke up his relation with HB?..
    didnt sound a good pr move by jen pr team ..

    even if it is fake..at least it involve adult only..no underage kid involve.

  79. siska says:

    btw..if jen pr announce about her tattoo,dog.etc..its their job..to tell the fans about their idol..and give an exposure ..that is their job.
    and if she talk about her divorce and her ordeal..is also her right..no amount of nasty words will justify the opposite…and if AJ want to comment its her right because its her own experience ..but her kids stuff..I am bit disagree here..the kids didnt have right yet..and as parent we should be protecting them from the harm of fame.

  80. siska says:

    if you accuse jen using the media to manipulate her image..which one is actually advantage for her?..pick one..the one they accused her as a career oriented woman who made BP wait for children,or the poor wife being dumb for younger wilder hotter woman? or a lonely woman who keep getting dumb by other man? or a scorned ex wife who keep waiting for her ex to return?
    or a box office poison cause she cant act?or a homewrecker of 14 years relation?

    this is the image created by the media,mag,tabloid,internet..which her pr can not possible be involve with..it cause her bad image.
    Her movie project Puma..about cougar woman..has a hard time to get studio sponsor cause..the studio think her image of poor jen..will not suitable for Puma role..so..its actually disadvantage her..
    and about her love life..can she allow to dated without being branded just for pr?..

  81. siska says:

    and for people who saying let jen married this loser so brangie will never connect with her again cause jen milking it..why the same didnt saying to brangie..?oowhy they just get over and married already..not keep teasing it with the “”if all the gay can get married they will married”..or our kids seem to wanted it more and more…so why not just do it..legalise it already so hope the media will find hard to connect them again…They already had 6 kids..so why wait?

  82. Karma says:

    private island= out side of the obvious pap shots, that means heidi is there hiding to vacation with her man. she is in on the fakery. all to support her man. justin has a similar contract to john mayer’s contract to fake his relationship with her at tne oscars.
    open your eyes people.
    and she is holding her tummy to purposely start the pregger rumors- all just to get you to notice her and watch her movie.
    too obvious and too desperate.
    pathetic is her middle name.

  83. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    College graduate here with loads of other advanced couse work and certificates and licenses.

    Now, can Anonymous stop being so rude and argumentative? I don’t think I can be bullied just like AJ and BP, so time, effort and energy wasted.

  84. Mousey says:

    Love the fact that people forget Brad majored in advertising so he is a PR guru himself.

  85. Overrated says:

    Hey Siska! Are you Justlly from Female First?? lol.

    It would explain a lot!

  86. Anita says:

    Love them together. I want pictures now. It is hard to find a good man who is above 30 and is not taken. If you click, and he leaves his GF but with diginity, then there is no problem. Brangelina were mean and tacky and too public in the way they hooked up. They and their fans also tried to make Jen look bad. What if Jen gave an interview and said Heidi didn’t want kids and she was Justin’s shoulder to cry on. In any case Angelina is not really a likeable person.

  87. Whatamess! says:

    @siska
    Well said..LOL..

  88. Addie says:

    Hope this works out.

    Seems like they are serious about each other, no matter the motives.

    She MIGHT be pregnant. It is pretty strange that she is not carrying even one bag in those Hawaii pics.
    Future parents protecing their future baby?….Will have to see.

  89. Annie says:

    Lolololololol.I can’t believe that some of u fell for @anonymous he/she was obviously teasing.Get a life people.