Kim Kardashian’s Photoshop diet on the cover of Us; claims to be a size 2


Did you know that Kim Kardashian magazine covers sell? It’s true, the issues of Glamour and Cosmopolitan with Kim solo on the cover were the highest sellers last year for those publications. Her other many magazine covers had mixed performances, but her Botox face and spider lashes can move copies.

So here we have Kim on the cover of the US Weekly diet issue, showing off her bikini body. This was obviously achieved through the Photoshop diet. We’ve seen plenty of bikini candids of Kim and she looks good albeit totally fake, but she doesn’t look like this. Someone went way overboard with the ‘shop. I also doubt that this photo is at all recent.

In that Cosmo interview for their August issue, Kim claimed to be a size 4, which many people scoffed at. In the new issue of US she’s claiming to be a size 2. I get that she’s shorter at 5’2″, but a size 2? Why doesn’t she just go for the gold and claim to be a zero? Here’s her vague diet advice and some words from her trainer:

Steers clear of sugar
The onetime sweets lover has dropped refined sugar from her diet. “Changing my eating habits makes a big difference,” the E! star tells US of keeping her size-2 body trim. Her healthy menu? “I wake up and eat eggs with turkey bacon, then salad for lunch and fish, pasta or chicken for dinner.

Goes organic
The newly single 5-foot-2 star has been inspired by big sister Kourtney, 32. “She’s taught me to eat more organically,” admits Kardashian, who has also downed wheatgrass shots with her sis. “She’s a bit extreme, but slowly I’m learning to love it.”

Sweats it out – hard!
There are no water breaks during the 31 year-old’s hour-long sessions with Gunnar Peterson. “Every minute is accounted for,” says the trainer. “You go from running to pull-ups to lunges to crunches to overhead presses. You get more work done in the same time.”

[From US Weekly, print edition, January 9, 2012]

That’s their entire article on Kim and her “exact meal plan.” At least she’s no longer shilling for that shady diet company that Scott works for. And at least she’s not training with that scam artist Tracy Anderson. Plus her diet sounds sensible even though she doesn’t give much advice, and I like that she’s not advertising for some paid plan. (Which she probably would be if one would have her.) Other than that I don’t have anything nice to say. I hope that her reign at the newsstands will soon be over.

Kim in March, 2011:

December 16, 2011:

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

126 Responses to “Kim Kardashian’s Photoshop diet on the cover of Us; claims to be a size 2”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

    • drobsn says:

      Dimension/size 0-2mp( Women’s Petite)
      Bust 32-34
      Waist 21-23½
      Hip 34-35½

      “I am a size 27 jeans… My measurements are 34, 26, 39.” -Kim Kardashian.

      It seems impossible that she could fit into a size 2 or 4 maybe 6-8. Her dimensions are just wrong for a 2. Just look at a standard sizing chart for a petit person.

  1. someone says:

    her face on this cover looks like the one she had in her Ray J days. it’s a lot prettier and middle eastern. also LOL SIZE 2?!! what a great way to wake up this morning…

    • njnick says:

      So true – her face does look like the original version.

    • Stephanie says:

      I immediately noticed how different her face looks on this cover too.

      • Jessica says:

        The first thing I thought when I saw the cover was, “who is that?” and then I read the headline and thought “That’s not Kim Kardashian! It looks nothing like her!” Now I maybe wrong. I have stopped watching her shows or paying much attention to her, but as I recall she has more of a rounded face than the face that’s on this cover. And if you look at the cover and then the other picture of her in her swimsuit her body is totally different! I’m not going to say she’s fatter in the lower photo, but she does have more meat on her bones compared to the cover shot. And Kim is only a size 2 in Photoshop land. You can’t have that big of a butt and be a size 2! There’s no way!

      • Scarlet Vixen says:

        I didn’t recognize her, either! I thought this was an old mag cover from the ‘beginning’ of her career. Ya know, back when she was best known for being Paris Hilton’s friend who organized rich people’s closets for a living.

        Hey, did anyone else hear that Sears is closing over 100 stores? Can we blame this on the Kardashian Klan and their krappy klothes? :-D

    • Heather M (Heather) says:

      You guys are right–face looks like former (pre-katface) Kim. However, I didn’t notice until you mentioned it b/c i was so focused on the fact that they put someone else’s body under her head.

      That is not her body. I’d actually be kind of pissed if I were her b/c that is just so obviously Photoshop. A least make it somewhat believable. Jeesh.

  2. Hautie says:

    Oh good grief, Kim is determine to lie about this isn’t she.

    Her sister Kourtney, is a size 2. A legit size 2. A size 2 is tiny. There is not much material difference between a 0 and a 2. You are tiny, if you are a 2.

    And I have never once seen a picture of Kim, that look like she was remotely as tiny as Kourtney.

    Plus I saw all those pictures of Kim looking thick as hell less than a month ago. So how is she suddenly a 2?

    Edited to add: Do you think Kim ever regrets having her ass pumped up? If she had left it alone… she could lie easier about being a size 2. But with that big ass… there is no way she would ever fit into a 2.

    • cmc says:

      I disagree…one of my good friends is 5’1″, practically a sphere, and a PANTS size 2- dress size 6/8 depending on the brand. Also, don’t underestimate the prevalence of vanity sizing these days. The other day I went to Express and discovered that I’m apparently a size 4. I’m a dress size 10, 8 if they cut generously across the chest- but apparently stores would like me to believe I’m a 4. *Scoff* suuuure. I’m not stupid enough to fall for that, but maybe Kimmycakes is.

      edit: also note, I’m 5’8. LOL @ Express, and also @ whoever Kim’s buying her clothes from.

    • Annie says:

      @cmc – yep, vanity sizing is more rampant than even. Not only that but the other day I was buying jeans and the shop assistant kept insisting I go down a size even though the 4′s I had on I could barely zip up and were spray on tight – I could have gone *up* a size if anything. Is this size 2 stuff supposed to be a complement or something? Cause personally I don’t like wearing something that sounds like a baby size.

      Does Kim regret the butt implants? No because that ass was her main attention grabbing ploy aside from the sex tape remember? Nobody would know who she is without it. She hates being called fat though, she wants to have her cake and eat it too so she keeps going on about how size 2 she is but doesn’t remove the assplants. I reckon she may be about a 4 without the ass.

  3. Smith says:

    Yea, they photoshopped her back to the mid-1990s, she looks like a teenager there.

    Or rather the teenage version of her Mom’s old face which makes sense since her Mom’s new face is Kim’s old face but that’s fine because she wasn’t really using it. Actually it did make an appearance here and there but mostly it was just home at night eating tiny cupcakes and googling itself.

    I’m not sure what Kim’s newest new face looks like because it shifts so often, sometimes morphing into Kourt’s face which is odd because they really didn’t look so alike for awhile and Kourt generally keeps her face to herself. And now Bruce’s face is also in on the action. On the Kristmas Kard it looks like he’s back to his old bad face (not the original face that was okay but the face after that when it went really ladylike and shocking). It had gotten better for awhile (or maybe I just got used to it) but with this latest face he looks like someone’s surprised great Aunt who applied her makeup in the car on the way over.

    I’m sorry what was the question?

  4. TheOriginalKitten says:

    Haaaaaaaa! I’m not saying she has to disclose her weight or size but why lie about it? Gimmee a break-there is NO way she is a size 2. *MAYBE* a size 4 (and that’s being generous) but more likely a size 6. And that ‘shopped pic scares me……

    • duncecap says:

      It infuriates me that KK is putting herself out there as some brave pioneer making it so that fuller figured young girls can feel good about themselves.

      At the same time she lies about her size to make herself feel skinnier. Lying bitch is full of lies.

  5. Diane says:

    Yeah, sure, her and Kirstie Alley.

  6. blc says:

    What a joke! That picture on the cover looks nothing like Kim. Her face has been totally altered and her body has been cut up big time. I don’t understand why they do this; we see candids of Kim all day every day (against our will oftentimes) so we know what she looks like. And she does not look like this! I don’t know why I get so mad when celebrities photoshop themselves into thinness and then lie about being a small size, but I do. It’s just so dishonest. And it also makes it seem like Kim and US Weekly think that we are all stupid if we are going to believe that nonsense.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      It is infuriating. Some celebs have the opportunity to present a realistic body but instead choose to perpetuate an unachievable image of the *ideal* female body. On top of that, it isn’t even REAL! They really aren’t doing women any favors with this bullsh*t…

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        Agreed. I get shopping out a huge pimple or a nasty looking cold sore, but drastically altering the face and body (then claiming to be something you’re not) is just plain infuriating. This is false advertising and, it could be argued that, this type of photoshopping should be “banned” (like those L’ Oreal makeup ads making false claims). Celebs are a “brand” too and, when they’re claiming to be something they’re not (especially while shilling diet and beauty products), their articles shouldn’t be permitted to run.

    • Original Tiffany says:

      I actually am laughing at this right now because I BOUGHT that mag two days ago and was tripping out on how weird she looks and I needed some distraction flying from LA to London.
      My 14 YO thin daughter is a legit 6 and she looks tiny compared to the usual Kim. I am an 8 and I don’t think my ass looks as big as hers.

  7. Franny says:

    Actually, she is still a sponsor for quicktrim. She had a tweet yesterday maybe about how walgreens is having a $19.99 sale on QuickTrim.

  8. cr says:

    Maybe her covers sell because people use them for dartboards?

  9. madpoe says:

    Size 2 brain?
    Size 2 shoe?
    Size 2 pound of makeup?
    I’m confused?!?

  10. Marjalane says:

    I put her in the same catagory as I put Oprah; Who are we going to believe, your obnoxious magazine articles, or our own eyes? Maybe a size 2 in alienspeak.

  11. Jill says:

    She is real, beautiful, demure and sensual woman. She has divine body. Just to die for. Stop hate her. What’s the different if she is size 2 or 6? Give her a break. People like you make the others to suffer from bulimia and anorexia. Show me your photos and let me comment them. Will see who’s more beautiful and slimmer.

    • normades says:

      No honey, SHE makes people anorexic by saying she’s a 2.

      And I’d gladly send you a picture because I AM A SIZE 2, and no, I do not have curves like that. My ass is flat and my boobies are little.

      I am not saying I have a good body. I’m just saying that I’m a skinny mini and that she’s a TOTAL LIAR.

      • MorticiansDoItDeader says:

        ITA.@ Normandes. Unrealistic expectations like these, and the constant media barrage of “perfect size two” women, definitely contribute to eating disorders.

        I am a 2 pants, but very busty. I used to have “no-ass-at-all,” but got a trainer who has me do tons of squats. Now, for the first time in my life, I actually have a booty! No “curves” though. I’m pretty much straight up and down with boobs. That’s the build of a size 2. Victoria beckham, gweneth Paltrow, tori spelling etc. They’re size 2s or smaller. Kardashian is not, and that would be ok if she weren’t claiming to be (and contributing to the neurosis of young women).

      • Annie says:

        She may not be promoting anorexia in the typical, obvious way however she is promoting a more subtle form of body dysmorphia and in a way even anorexia too. This woman is obsessed with getting a body that is deemed “perfect” and criticism-proof by society and will go to any un-natural lengths to do so. It is not politically correct to look at a picture of an obviously anorexic person and say “hey, that’s how I wanna look!”, but to look at Kim K and say you want to look like her? That’s just cool! Oh, but wait…Kim is a size 2.

        Oh, and I am a size 4/6 and I’m sure I’d look like a scrawny string bean next to Kim.

    • lilred says:

      It wouldn’t be a big deal if these “people” would just be honest. I personally don’t care if she is a 2,10 or 20 but,I do care that they think People are stupid enough to believe all the crap that they spew out of their mouths.

    • MerryHappy says:

      You obviously know NOTHING about eating disorders. as someone that had disordered patterns for 7 years (I’m assuming by the nature of your comment that that is about half of your lifetime thus far) I find it both laughable and insulting that you think us pointing out her lies will… Give her an eating disorder? …huh? If anything the perpetuation of unrealistic beauty standards and the media contribute, but it is definitely a psychological issue masking control issue from a perfectionistic personality. Saying its about feeling fat is such a rudimentary grasp of it. your comments always seem to be laughable as if you’re to young to actually get it. And as a recovered person, who its fit, healthy, and a size 2/4 I have to say B!TCH PLEASE. the only size 2 she *might be* is 2 to the second power. (bad math joke…)

      • Annie says:

        MerryHappy, (or anyone else ever suffered with this)

        I’m just wondering, if since a perfectionistic personality is part of the cause of eating disorders then why does that also go hand in hand with being thin? From my perspective the body type that gets the most praise lavished upon it (thus presumably the most ‘perfect’ in the eyes of society) is slighly towards the thick side if anything and most certainly not skinny which everyone seems to hate (although I personally like skinny if it is natural).

        I’m not trying to be hurtful, I’m just trying to understand ED’s which are honestly very bewildering to me and I agree seem to be something far more complex than the media portrayal.

      • MerryHappy says:

        Ideals are arbitrary, and even if someone says that they’re doing it to be ‘thin’ and achieve the ‘ideal’ it isn’t correct. Actually in a cross cultural perspective, in japan women (according to a research study) have anorexia because of issues with growing up and being an adult in the adult world. Most anorexics know they look terrible. They just can’t stop. Achieving thinness is kind of a cover for personal problems with their daily life or childhood. Its been linked to sex abuse, neglect, and bad relationships with a mother.isabella caro died of anorexia last winter and was a huge advocate of trying to change beauty standards and encourage health. She had a strained relationship with her mother. She never felt good enough and want allowed to grow (her mom was psychologically unbalanced). Something about being a people pleaser that wants to be perfect but feels inadequate can manifest through disordered eating. You can control every aspect of your relationship with foods, even if it never appears to be the ‘reason’behind it. Then you pick yourself apart and enter this strange state of mind where this neurotic mind frame makes sense and you have to do it. It isn’t about being thin at least for me but BECAME about being thin once you’re already disordered.

      • Annie says:

        @MerryHappy – I’m naturally on the thinner side and I went through this period of forcing myself to gain weight (I know that’s not classified as an ED but it was psychologically very unhealthy nonetheless). Interestingly for me it was also about control but in a completely different way – I wanted to manipulate how others percieved me and I had this intense dislike of how “skinny” people are percieved. Also interesting you mention anorexia can be about not wanting to become an adult, I also had the exact opposite of that, I very much wanted everyone to know how mature and adult I was. I still find reading threads where thin people are flamed triggering and often have to make myself keep away.

    • paranormalgirl says:

      In what world is she demure?

  12. Jennifer12 says:

    I can’t stand that family, but she has a healthy looking body and at least she isn’t telling people to live on diet shakes. Pity that she feels she has to say she’s a size 2 when her body looks great the way it is right now, but listen to everyone lining up to bash her size 6 figure. She’s a disgusting person, but nice body, and more importantly, she’s not a lollipop head.

    • Annie says:

      It kind of this line of thinking that’s the reason she’s so famous though, even though she doesn’t deserve to be – the whole “at least she has an ass and isn’t rail thin” stuff. I can’t agree here the main reason being that Kim’s ass is fake. I really don’t see how getting silicone and goodness knows what put into your body to live up to a ‘curvy’ ideal is any more noble than snorting lines of coke to look super skinny. Both could potentially damage health. There is so much more to health than simply not looking “too skinny”. Kourtney and Khloe do have good butts – big but not ridiculous and fake. They still suck as human beings though and in no way should be admired for that alone.

  13. Incredulous says:

    Ah yes, diets. To compare and contrast, GIS Gillian Keith and Nigella Lawson. One advocates a lot of boring food, the other loves her grub. They are the same age. Draw your own conclusions.

  14. Cathy says:

    Yeah, she’s a size two and I’m 21 years old… and a size 0

  15. bros says:

    oh so they are back to their magazine covers from 2 years ago-the endless ones about their bodies and diets and bikinis. now that she sees no one buys the love angle anymore and her romantic life is no longer profitable, they turn back to what they know best.

  16. yael says:

    height means nothing in this case. i’m 5’3″ish with a bubble butt (although much smaller than katface’s), 130 lbs, and i couldn’t fit into a size 2 if my life depended on it. i can’t even do up the zipper on a size 4.

    massive, massive bullsh-t.

    • Original Tiffany says:

      This!
      I’m 150 pound and 5’9″ and am an 8. No way is she a 2. Can’t we all just tell the truth? This includes stars, models and STORES! Let’s size clothing correctly and love ourselves. Shoot, I really wished I embraced my figure and height when I was in my 20′s! This BS just makes us and our teens all feel abnormal.

  17. GlitterSha says:

    she’s had liposuction contouring…

  18. Sim says:

    That’s a load of BS Jill it’s actually the magazines that promote bulimia and anorexia by photoshopping these idiots into unrealistic ideals of what women should look like. No one can aspire to what photoshop can do it’s impossible but every single picture in every magazine has it applied. Such an ignorant comment from a woman, I’m astounded.

  19. Tierra says:

    Holy Photoshop!!!

    If his ad was in a European mag they would have banned it b/c of the heavy photo shopping.

  20. pissmellinmidget says:

    she’s nowhere near 5ft. 2 ..
    maybe with 8 inch hells on !
    i saw her & she is totally vertically challenged with tiny ugly legs ..
    on tremendous high heels ..
    to see her live in person is more than most people could bear without cracking up at the realization that a myth has been created ..
    she is also waaaaay overstyled & made-up ..
    all that tottering on a perch makes her an ass clown literally ..
    this is really why she has to pay men or initiate a ‘deal’ ..
    i see the covers & have a great laugh about it …
    people actually laugh in her face & she calls them ‘fans’ …
    hysterical ..
    poor khloe ( who is actually gorgeous in real life) & average height has to play a giant to hide the fact that kim is a midget …
    not one guy gonna go with that skank & its ‘ mind boggling how the PR team thinks the public is so stupid as to believe yet another lie about reggie or that she is getting paid 600 thou’ ..
    uhhh yeah , riiiiiiiiiight LOL..
    but now it’s gone too far ..
    enough is enough ..
    the stink of piss & greed is overwhelming ..
    sign the petition if ya’ll want them gone ..BOYCOTTKIM.COM

  21. Maggs says:

    Her face does look way different to me here…longer or something. That website Home Mail also has pics from the Kartrashian Christmas party and she looks like this pic also…she has done something new to her face or chin/teeth…

  22. CreamSoda says:

    Her body looks good on the mag cover, whether real or photoshopped. However, her photoshopped face slightly reminded me of teen mom Farrah, the one Courtney had a Twitter feud with a while back. Not sure why; might be the facial expression in this pic. Either that or they’ve both been photoshopped by the same person before.

  23. mel says:

    This bitch lies about everything, whatever.

  24. Bob says:

    Does anyone believe the crap that comes out of her mouth? The whole family is full of s**t. She’s a joke.

  25. Seal Team 6 says:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  26. Agnes says:

    Muahahahahaha! Nothing about that “photograph” looks like her. Not the face, not the body. Awesome.

  27. Rosalee says:

    you could roll me up and put me in one of her butt cheeks, not that I would want to go there but just saying there is no way she is a size 2 nope nada..

  28. Nina says:

    Sure, I’ll believe it.

    Why? Because there is no standard when someone says ‘I’m size x’. I’m 5’10″. I’m slim but not emaciated. My clothing generally is size 2 through 6 .. which is a smaller clothing size range than I wore in high school when I was anorexic and 40 lbs lighter than I am now. That makes zero sense. Vanity sizing is absolutely ridiculous these days so I do not doubt at all that Kim is able to shimmy her way into an article of clothing that has a size 2 label. So of course she is pegging that lowest clothing size.

    The problem is that, without standardization of what those sizes represent, it means absolutely nothing. The problem is that we all have EYES.

    I wish celebrities would just stop declaring their size altogether since saying ‘I’m size 2!’ means and makes just as much sense as saying ‘I’m size KACHOOIE BAM-BAM!’

    Nonsense! All of it!

  29. ladybert62 says:

    My oh my – well to begin with, that picture on the cover of the magazine does not even look like her.

    Then she wants me to believe she is a size 2? Absolutely not – never ever would I believe that. A size 12 or 22 but not a 2 – her boobs and butt alone are a size 22!!

    Ha ha – stop lying Ms. Kim!

  30. Emma - the JP lover says:

    Kim has been claiming to be smaller than she actually is for years, but there is no way in heck that this dumpy little thing is a size 2.

    You know who else is 5’2″ and has a problem with every speck of extra weight showing up on her petite frame? Christina Aguilera. Now, Xtina was a ‘true’ size 2 in her film “Burlesque,” but Kimmy has NEVER been that small in her life. I wonder why she insists on lying about her size? We all have eyes.

  31. truthful says:

    In January, she’ll be touting that “trima spa”–she actually has nevers topped on her twitter…in which she claims to going on diets w/her twitter fans if they are taking Trim spa..

    hmm, why would she need a trainer, when she has her money making exercise dvd??

    next she’ll be a 0–yeah right

    she lies like a rug, she’s pathetic.

  32. LisaMarie says:

    Oh honey, how dumb do you think we are? But if you need to tell yourself every morning that you’re a size 2, or 4, or whatever you’re shilling that particular day in order to make momma Kris some benjamins, then you go right ahead, mmmmmkay?

  33. assistantrachel says:

    They left off a zero after that 2, huh?

  34. Pauline Bernoski says:

    She is a lying piece of shit! I wish she would go away!

  35. jesstar says:

    If that was supposed to be Kourtney’s body, I’d believe it. Kim has almost no torso, so this is obviously fake.

  36. rosa says:

    this is how kim kardashian would like to look

  37. lisa says:

    Size 2.

    ok.. is that the right thigh or the left thigh

    I am so tired of these women screaming what size they are. As if to say you should be this size too. Kristie, JHud, JLH..all of them are constantly spouting off what size they are now. What freaking difference does it make. other than the clothes you wear. Same personality. same non talent. Same everything

    I don’t care what size any of these women wear. I know that all the issues this week mostly focus on Weight and diet or exercise. UGH so tired.

  38. Palermo says:

    Her face looks totally different lately, in those pictures with Santa and now this cover

  39. deva says:

    An Old Navy size 2.

    On the bottom only. I mean, she has those huge boobs. They are not fitting into a size 2, even if Walmart sold size 2.

    Why do women who want the huge boobs want to be a size that only flat chested 5′ 2″ women like myself fit into?

    And yes, I am an Old Navy size 2 on the bottom. ;)

  40. novaraen says:

    Did they move her nose or mouth to a different location on her face??? It looks so strange…er…stranger than usual. LOL…she is so pathetic. Size 2??!?!?! Hasn’t she learned that the public will pull her apart for saying lying sh*t like that? The girl has been looking even more plumpy lately than usual…I mean, geez…her photos get forced on us constantly. We KNOW the truth Kimbo the bimbo.

  41. anonymoose says:

    more smith! excellent.
    [edit: see #4, above]

  42. Poison Ivy says:

    Now I’m just waiting for Kristie Alley to step out and pretending to be a size 2 as well.

    Who do you think you’re foolin’? My sister is thinner than her and she is a size 4 to 6. The rich and famous must have a diffrent metric system.

    • sluggo says:

      I seem to recall Kirstie has indeed claimed to be a size 2. Weird. I can’t even fit a size 2 on my HEAD and I’m easily 100 lbs. lighter.

      The only way Kim could possibly hit that size is if she unstraps that phony foam-rubber ass she wears. Is there ANYTHING real about this chick? Except the fact that she’s real annoying?

      Let’s make 2012 a good year and KANCEL THE KARDASHIANS. Boycott, change the channel, avoid stores selling their merchandise … hell, VOODOO DOLLS even … let’s just all do what we can to get these media lice out of our scalps.

  43. Str8Shooter says:

    Maybe her BRAIN is a size 2…in fact, I’d even say a size 0.

    But no way in hell is that FAT caboose of hers a size 2.

  44. kerker says:

    All I can say to this nonsense is uh no, girl. I don’t think she has seen a size 2 in a good long time. I don’t mean it in a hateful way but why lie?

  45. Aurelia says:

    Speaking of vanity sizing, get a load of this, I saw an E segment with Kelly Osbourne being brought in a selection of Sarah Jessica Parkers famous dresses from the Sex and the City movies.

    She tried on that dusty pink tired strapless sheer organza dress sarah wore and shrieked she was the same size as Sarah!

    Dreams are free.

  46. Violet's Roses says:

    Boring and unattractive. The end.

  47. Reece says:

    From the title alone: Bitch Please!

  48. nikzilla37 says:

    Gawd, she’s such a phony bitch. I can’t wait for her to go away.

  49. Rockobuster says:

    This is a good reason why you should sign the “no more kardashians” petition at boycottkim.com

  50. Kim says:

    Who is on this cover?? The face & body are NOT Kim K! This is beyond photoshopping! Looks nothing like her.

    I just CANCELED my US subscription. I am so over this family I wont buy anything with them on the cover. Even if they were good people i would be sick of them by now but they are hideous, fake, pathetic people so Im REALLY over them.

    Sign the boycottkim.com petition.

    • sluggo says:

      I think you may be on to something … I wonder what would happen if, along with the regular Boycott Kim procedure, there was a boycott of magazines (US being first in line) who put this nonsensical hobag on their covers. At a time when most print media is hurting, that might hit ‘em where they live. Then again, since the Kartrashians are like roaches, they can survive just about anything: boycotts, nuclear attack, brain death, you name it.

      My God, how I wish these creatures would just go away.

  51. ... says:

    Adding my size two cents…..
    I am 5’0 and 110 lbs with a big round butt but not obscene like hers. I also have a large chest. My entire life I have been a size 0/2 but recently with my slight weight gain of 10lbs (up from 100 lbs) I can no longer fit in my size 2 jeans. I’m a reluctant size 4 because if the impossible standards of beauty pushed on us normal women. I am very curvy but if I were as outright thick as this girl,then there is no way I could be a size anything under 6. Generously! How sad that celebrities feel the need to lie about such petty things. I own up to my fake boobs, though they re easily possible for real ones, I admit to wearing hair extensions, I let other women know I do workout to keep my butt up high. Our poor children, coming up in this world…

  52. Heavenbound says:

    This woman is like a roach, impossible to get rid of. Why are they still giving this skank magazine covers. She and her clan are disliked even in Hollywood, even the president thinks she is a joke! Stop giving her any coverage for the sake of humanity!

  53. sabine says:

    Sick of her. Go away already

  54. Firecracker says:

    I saw this magazine at the store today, and it looks like she’s about 16 years old in it. I think it’s an old picture of her. And there’s no way those legs, butt and boobies are a size 2 like everyone else is sayin.

  55. Dawning Red says:

    Well, of course Kim Kardashian covers sell. We pee on them all the time at my house. Sometimes we even draw targets on her face so the guys can have contests on who has the best aim.

  56. Tristyn says:

    Her stylist must be paid very well to sew in a size 2 label in her clothes..holy heck! Just one of her ass cheeks isn’t a wishful size 2 w/out the help of extreme photoshopping…

  57. Mimi says:

    Little OT but even more disturbing is Us advertising how you can get Pippa’s butt…now that’s someone who needs assplants. ;)

  58. Kittiekatt says:

    If she is a size 2, then I’m the tooth fairy.

  59. Penguin says:

    Insulting to those of us that actually are a size to 2.

  60. Mrs. Odie 2 says:

    Enough! I am so sick of this no talent whore! She or her kin are on the cover of Kardashian Weekly every week! I will not fund this brothel for a single issue more.

  61. kimberly says:

    her ass is a size 14 alone. When did not eating, or only eating when photographed start being called a diet? Like being a size 2 is a huge accomplishment . . . maybe in 1999 being a size 2 was cool, but now it’s just a cry for attention in hollywood. A cry of, “PLEASE DON’T FORGET ME!!!! I AM RELEVANT! I NEED MORE PUBLICITY BECAUSE I HAVE NO TALENT TO SPEAK OF . . .”

  62. Joey says:

    Her left butt cheek might be a size 2.

  63. GoodCapon says:

    I hate the Kardashians as much as the next person, but I just have to say that the sisters look so much better without makeup on.

  64. Mary jones says:

    Aren’t Nicole Richie and they Olsen twins a size 2? They r sticks. I’d like to see Kim try on some of their clothes they are about the same height. She couldn’t get her thigh into one pant leg.

  65. skuddles says:

    The only thing size 2 about this broad is her IQ…

  66. Riri says:

    If she is short (5’2) than she could be size 2.

    Whey you are tiny, you fit into the smaller sizes.

    • novaraen says:

      Yeah…but this trick has a butt like a “garbage bag filled with cottage cheese” (to quote Paris Hilton…lol)…and there is NO way…even being a shortie that she is a size 2. Those boobs wouldn’t fit into anything that’s a 2 either…trust. I have to buy bigger sizes based on the fact that my boobs won’t fit into the smaller sizes…even if the rest of me will. lol

  67. Nev says:

    you all cannot blame kim for everything wrong in society..she can say she’s any size she wants too be…geez.

    she’s vain, spoilt, and changed her mind about her marriage…so what??!!

    why is she being crucified?

    we all knew from the show that she was spoiled and princessy…its her prob if she wants to divorce her husband who seemed so difficult and cave-manish and aggressive to her family and friends anyways…he wasn’t such a gem in the end.

    everybody is so outraged… at what though?

    if kate middleton decides to leave her marriage…r u all gonna treat her the same?

    her wedding was much bigger, world-wide…should she stay with him, even if she’s not happy?… since it too was so publicized and watched??!!!

  68. DI says:

    Please refer to photo-shopping 101 – NEVER touch the face, because then you KNOW the WHOLE THING HAS BEEN RE-DONE.

  69. Lisa says:

    lol, how special are you for cutting out refined sugar. Major eye rolling right here.

  70. Molly says:

    Size 2? HA
    A size 6 is more likely. Kim is tiny, so there is no way she is a size 2. Im 5’11, and a size 10, but I have been told that I look a 6 or a 4 because my weight is evenly placed. Kim is all in her ass, and that cannont possibly be that big if she is a size 2. Its impossible. He weight would be even, not just in one place.

  71. bobby says:

    I stopped shopping at QVC because of the Kartrashians. She was ugly when she was younger and ugly now.

  72. janie says:

    Well, she might be a size 2 at Costco…

  73. thejadedentrepreneur says:

    She’s about a 6, not a 2.

  74. Yor says:

    Thanks for information,around the diet,there are many myths,is important know correct information for a get a good balanced diet.
    Thanks for sharing.