Comments on: Star’s ‘Twins for Jennifer Aniston Story’ is unsurprisingly misleading http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/ Stylish celebrity escapism Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:28:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jeanne http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-139665 Jeanne Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:02:26 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-139665 Damn, we hear way more about this chick now than the 10 long years Friends was on. My question is why? Can we get a break from JA, and AJ? If she had any class, she'd leave the country for a while and start a new life somewhere, marry a foreign diplomat, or some wealthy old guy who'd spoil her. Or she could get her own back and bust up Gwynnie and her part-time hubby in London. How embarassing trying to patch up some lame ass relationship with John Mayer. The man dated Jessica Simpson, what does that tell you? JA would also make a good girlfriend for Lance Armstrong. Damn, we hear way more about this chick now than the 10 long years Friends was on. My question is why? Can we get a break from JA, and AJ? If she had any class, she’d leave the country for a while and start a new life somewhere, marry a foreign diplomat, or some wealthy old guy who’d spoil her. Or she could get her own back and bust up Gwynnie and her part-time hubby in London. How embarassing trying to patch up some lame ass relationship with John Mayer. The man dated Jessica Simpson, what does that tell you? JA would also make a good girlfriend for Lance Armstrong.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Lizzy http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-138261 Lizzy Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:53 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-138261 Right, cause Aniston is the only one who ever gets photographed by paps. You're too wrapped up in your obsessive love for AJ. It's so much more than an admiring fan. It's sad. I don't even really care for Aniston, or Jolie, but it's so easy to defend Aniston when you claim EVERYTHING she does is just SO horrible and EVERYTHING Jolie does is just so great. Right, cause Aniston is the only one who ever gets photographed by paps. You’re too wrapped up in your obsessive love for AJ. It’s so much more than an admiring fan. It’s sad. I don’t even really care for Aniston, or Jolie, but it’s so easy to defend Aniston when you claim EVERYTHING she does is just SO horrible and EVERYTHING Jolie does is just so great.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Kaiser http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137752 Kaiser Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:05:36 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137752 Jesus, Lizzy. Get a f-cking grip. Of course I'm "confident" about my opinions. What a silly, petty thing to whine about. And when I refer to Pity Party's "Goddess Circle losers" I'm talking about Andrea Buchenwald (or whatever her name is) and all of those women who seem like "professional" friends, who's "job" seems to be doing interviews, being quoted directly in articles in Vanity Fair, Vogue, etc, and who are (my opinion) the same unnamed sources for the tabloids. And the reason for my *opinion* (confidently so) that Aniston's PR shenanigans are obvious - see pap photographs FROM THE IVY. See "relationships" with John Mayer, Vince Vaughn, that random coked-up man-whore, etc. And I actually call bullshit on a lot of these stories - both Aniston and Jolie stories. You girls are too wrapped up in your victimhood to see anything beyond the Pity Party. Jesus, Lizzy. Get a f-cking grip. Of course I’m “confident” about my opinions. What a silly, petty thing to whine about.

And when I refer to Pity Party’s “Goddess Circle losers” I’m talking about Andrea Buchenwald (or whatever her name is) and all of those women who seem like “professional” friends, who’s “job” seems to be doing interviews, being quoted directly in articles in Vanity Fair, Vogue, etc, and who are (my opinion) the same unnamed sources for the tabloids.

And the reason for my *opinion* (confidently so) that Aniston’s PR shenanigans are obvious – see pap photographs FROM THE IVY. See “relationships” with John Mayer, Vince Vaughn, that random coked-up man-whore, etc.

And I actually call bullshit on a lot of these stories – both Aniston and Jolie stories. You girls are too wrapped up in your victimhood to see anything beyond the Pity Party.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Lizzy http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137691 Lizzy Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:06:21 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137691 Kaiser: November 9th, 2008 at 9:38 pm "But Aniston and her cadre of Goddess Circle losers always have been the sources for many (granted, not ALL) of the stories that end up in the tabloids and celeb sites. Her PR shenanigans have been very obvious for years" Sounds like you're pretty confident in these "opinions." Can you name any of said Goddess Circle losers? Who are they exactly? And what is your proof that they are the sources for these stories? How about they're made up by overzealous writers and editors who want to sell more papers? Oh, I forgot, that's only when the stories/lies are about AJ. Ha. Kaiser:
November 9th, 2008 at 9:38 pm “But Aniston and her cadre of Goddess Circle losers always have been the sources for many (granted, not ALL) of the stories that end up in the tabloids and celeb sites. Her PR shenanigans have been very obvious for years”

Sounds like you’re pretty confident in these “opinions.” Can you name any of said Goddess Circle losers? Who are they exactly? And what is your proof that they are the sources for these stories? How about they’re made up by overzealous writers and editors who want to sell more papers? Oh, I forgot, that’s only when the stories/lies are about AJ. Ha.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Kaiser http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137636 Kaiser Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:44:10 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137636 Kristin, did I claim to have facts? These are my opinions. Just like everybody else. Kristin, did I claim to have facts? These are my opinions. Just like everybody else.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Granger http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137568 Granger Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:25:24 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137568 prissa, I'm with you! I often go straight to the comments before reading the article. And god knows any comments about a JA article are FAR more entertaining than the article itself. :lol: prissa, I’m with you! I often go straight to the comments before reading the article. And god knows any comments about a JA article are FAR more entertaining than the article itself. :lol:

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Kristin http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137543 Kristin Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:17:08 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137543 Kaiser, you are unbelievable. Where are you getting those "facts"? Kaiser, you are unbelievable. Where are you getting those “facts”?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: cali http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137487 cali Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:32:20 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137487 I fault Brad Pitt for marrying this stupid famewh*re - as punishment for such horrid mistake, she'll be forever his albatross coattail rider - thankfully she's reaching her "Hollywood" expiration date: 40 and maybe if we get lucky she'll finally go away for good. I fault Brad Pitt for marrying this stupid famewh*re – as punishment for such horrid mistake, she’ll be forever his albatross coattail rider – thankfully she’s reaching her “Hollywood” expiration date: 40 and maybe if we get lucky she’ll finally go away for good.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: prissa http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137426 prissa Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:04:51 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137426 Okay now that I read the article, if this is true :roll: then she should take a trip to the Kununurra waterfalls because it sure worked for Nicole Kidman. :roll: Okay now that I read the article, if this is true :roll: then she should take a trip to the Kununurra waterfalls because it sure worked for Nicole Kidman. :roll:

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: prissa http://www.celebitchy.com/20832/stars_twins_for_jennifer_aniston_story_is_unsurprisingly_misleading/#comment-137421 prissa Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:58:11 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=20832#comment-137421 You know, all these gossip articles are (for the most part) utter nonsense. Truly, I only come here to read the awesome posts!!! Sometimes I don't even read the article, I just scroll down to the posts and if I need to, refer to the article for specifics. But, for me, the POSTS are GREAT!!! :mrgreen: You know, all these gossip articles are (for the most part) utter nonsense. Truly, I only come here to read the awesome posts!!! Sometimes I don’t even read the article, I just scroll down to the posts and if I need to, refer to the article for specifics. But, for me, the POSTS are GREAT!!! :mrgreen:

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]>