People: Jennifer Aniston “is not a bitter person” & she wants Brad to be happy

Soon after Brangelina’s engagement was announced last Friday, Hollywood Life had a story about Jennifer Aniston being “happy” for Brad and Angelina. Then E! News got into the act late Monday, with sources telling them that Jennifer “doesn’t care” about the engagement, and that she’s “moved on” even though nobody thinks she has “moved on.” And now it’s time for People Magazine’s sources to weigh in. People Mag, the gold standard of celebrity gossip. If People says it happened a certain way, that’s the way it happened (or the way their publicist would have you believe it happened). So what do People’s sources say? Jennifer has “moved on”. Yet again. Jennifer “is not a bitter person” – contrary to all of those bitter interviews, I guess. And she’s “very happy with Justin.” Of course.

Jennifer Aniston has nothing but warm wishes for her ex-husband Brad Pitt and his new fiancée, Angelina Jolie.

“Jen moved on a long time ago, and she is trying to just focus on her own happiness,” a source says of the actress, 43, who will celebrate her 1-year anniversary with boyfriend Justin Theroux in May. Pitt and Jolie announced their engagement last week.

“Jen is not a bitter person and she has always wanted Brad to be happy,” says the source. The couple divorced in 2005 after five years of marriage.

“Jen spent many happy years with Brad and thinks their divorce was meant to be,” adds the source. Now living in L.A. with actor-writer Theroux, 40, “she is very happy with Justin – and that’s what she is focusing on right now.”

[From People]

I said yesterday that I was going to wait until Jennifer said something directly, or until it was clear that her publicist spoke to an outlet. I was holding out for Us Weekly, but I’m going to take this People story as The Official Aniston Version. Right? This is how Aniston wants to put herself out there, so let’s analyze this move. She’s not bitter. She has moved on. She’s focusing on her own happiness. She’s focusing on Justin. She’s always wanted Brad to be happy (but not Angelina). Eh. Sure. This situation makes me sleepy.

What’s more interesting to me is that People Mag drops in the whole “one year anniversary” thing with Justin. Yeah… they didn’t get together last May. They got together months before. They’ve already spent more than a year together. So I’ve got to wonder if, beyond the tabloid BS, Jennifer and Justin are actually engaged or already on the “marriage path”. Because you know what sucks? If Jennifer and Justin announce their engagement at any point in the next six months, everyone will just say they’re copying, or that Aniston is dragging Justin to the altar to one-up her ex-husband. And… that’s not fair to her. She homewrecked her piece, she should get to marry him whenever and however she wants.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Terry’s Diary.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

117 Responses to “People: Jennifer Aniston “is not a bitter person” & she wants Brad to be happy”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Bite me says:

    Let me get my popcorn ready

    • autumndaze says:

      Scoot over and throw in some m&m’s.
      I’m up!

    • Jean says:

      Oh leave her alone! I feel sometime that she just can’t win no matter what she says or does. Some people are always so mean to her. Let it go. She clearly moved on!

      • helvetica says:

        100% agree jean

      • Rhea says:

        Yup. Now I wish people could do the same for Angelina, too. She also just can’t win no matter what she says or does. Some people are always so mean to either A or J 😉

      • Jean says:

        @ Rhea

        Not really. Angelina is pure evil. XOXO 😉

      • Rhea says:

        Now, now dear Jean…You know that’s not being fair.Play nice…tsk,tsk,tsk 🙂

      • Micki says:

        YUP!She moved SO on that she’ll wring Justin’s poor neck if HE doesn’t propose till the end of the year…(oh, yes, baby or no baby)

      • Emma says:

        Jennifer is an attention seeking, manipulative, and insecure individual. I’d rather be mistress of all evil (angelina jolie/maleficent) than Jennifer.

      • Marishka says:

        @ Jean : Move on girl! You’re being bitchy here again..

  2. autumndaze says:

    You know it is a Huvane PR-planted piece when the facts get re-remembered. They were together long before May last year, and inconveniently, when he was still living with his girlfriend.

    • Carolyn says:

      All of the Aniston articles are PR plants by Huvane. Has no other angle to go other than this. Still maintain she has tabloid interest only because of being dumped by Brad and she certainly went along with the careful PR planned with military precision to this day. Her continued success is solely due to PR…it can’t be because of any stellar acting skills. I’m amazed people are still falling for this nonsense.

  3. paola says:

    She moved on, Brad moved on, Angelina moved on, Maddox is almost old enough to drive a car, can we please all move on now for the love of god????

  4. Dibba says:

    People magazine is just an outlet for all the PR spewed by industry. I find it boring.

  5. mln76 says:

    Yeah the only thing that’s interesting is that she inadvertently admitted to cheating what a hypocrite.

    • Bite me says:

      Jen would never cause another woman the type of pain tha Jolie caused her … the woman been through enough heartache for a lifetime … Poor Jen bitch just can’t win

    • The Original Mia says:

      Can’t believe she admitted it. Not as if those without rose-colored glasses didn’t already know the truth.

  6. Folly says:

    Enough of all this crap,its been seven years already and I doubt brad wil be ask how he feels when aniston wil be engage,God please let this love triangle die and let us not experience another one again forever.
    You know kaiser,jolie just get promoted by the UNHCR that seems like a better news than this jen/brad/jolie thing

  7. Overrated says:

    You can see the scar where Maniston got a hairline adjustment. Her old friend Nancy was right about that….

    • ThirdChris says:

      I never noticed that. What in hell is a hairline adjustment?! Now it’s all I can see.

      • Agnes says:

        yeah, what IS a hair adjustment?

      • Eve says:

        @ ThirdChris and Agnes:

        Hairline adjustment is when a person who has a small forehead has a procedure done to “raise” her hairline (in order to have a bigger forehead). The procedures vary from laser and electrolysis hair removal to an actual surgery where they cut and pull the skin up.

      • fabgrrl says:

        I think a hairline adjustment moves the hairline back. Rita Hayworth had one, to make her look less Spanish.

      • Eve says:

        @ Fabgrrl:

        I read somewhere Rita Hayworth had the electrolysis procedure (not only she had a short forehead, but also she had a lot of facial hair). By the way, she had a lot of other things done — including a nose job and having her skin lightened (using hydroquinone, an already dangerous procedure nowadays, let alone back in the 1940s).

        P.S.: (about the hairline adjustment) I believe the forehead’s skin is pulled up while the hairline is pulled back. Recovering must be painful as hell.

      • LAK says:

        @Eve – it was standard practice in old hollywood to make over starlets. It’s quite shocking what ‘natural’ beauties were anything but. They were not promoted until the required make-over was complete.

        Rita Hayworth is the tip of the iceberg.

        When you read about the 1940s face lifts….yikes!!! Thank god for fillers and botox. Much kinder and better to the face.

      • Eve says:

        @ LAK:

        I’ve always known about that but her (Hayworth) makeover still shocked me. It was so dramatic I couldn’t believe what I was seeing — you know, the before and after pictures. She looked like a latina (her mother was of Irish descent, her father was Spanish), and they turned her into a redhead white woman. Unbelievable.

        EDIT (found the article — scroll down, Hayworth is # 3):

        http://www.cracked.com/article_17501_5-celebrity-careers-launched-by-ethnic-makeovers.html

      • sup says:

        all those procedures sound terrifying. i have a low hairline myself but i’d never get one of either jeniston or rita’s. small forehead girls unite! lol

    • Zelda says:

      Wow, you’re right.
      I can’t not notice it now.

    • Lady D says:

      What ThirdChris and Agnes said.

      • jesstar says:

        I see gray roots, not a scar. Should I be looking at the top of her forehead? I’ve never heard of the surgery, just the electolysis version. I think Kim K had that too.

  8. Anne de Vries says:

    If everybody believed she was over it, the media wouldn’t be rushing to connect her to ask her opinion..

    I kind of believe it though – she seems happy with Whatshisface and like she’s finally moving on (because yeah, she played the victim forever).
    On the other hand it would be perfectly reasonable if she had a bit of a pang for what she once thought was going to be a life with Pitt – like almost everybody gets when you hear your ex is getting married. It’s like a final goodbye to your dreams from way back. You might have something better now and not miss your ex at all, but it was still something you really wanted at one point.

  9. Tapioca says:

    She had Brad when he was hot, now she has Justin while he’s hot.

    I can see why she’s happy to move on!

    • paola says:

      yes he was the hottest then.. now brad he’s morphing into Robert Redford

    • Hipocricy says:

      I disagree, Heidi had him when he was somewhat cute, heavier with less wrinkles and with better skin, still with short ugly legs though. Jen on the other hand, not so much as he is the oldest looking 40 years old she ever dates. On the otherhand, he dropped a fresh looking woman who looks barely 25 at 36 for a wrinkly well preserved 40+ years old woman with a sun damaged leather skin.

      But does that means that she will dump her current boyfriend when he will lose all his hair which will be soon and well before he reached Pitt’s current age; Does that means she will go after one of the Twilight guys as she turns 50.

      You make her looks as superfiial as Madonna, an aging woman who will take guys when they are hot then drop them like old socks when they lose their youth.

    • mln76 says:

      Happiness in a relationship is not about someone being ‘hotter’. More important is how the people in the relationship are relating to one another. I hope she’s happier with Justin than she was with Brad, or Vince, or John, or Paul, or Tate.
      I hope for her sake if one day she wakes up bloated and her old nose comes back and she looks terrible in a bikini Justin won’t say you aren’t hot anymore I’m leaving.

    • Francesca says:

      Really? Justin is hot?.. I mean he can hardly be described as an attractive man to start with. He looks odd.

  10. Marina85 says:

    .

  11. Jayna says:

    Never hold out for US Weekly. They are a few steps above the others, but I find stuff wrong in their stories all the time, sloppy journalism,, just slopped together to make a story. The A lusters leak a comment like this to People Magazine for sure because they are the Gold standard.

  12. Me says:

    I dont think it makes any difference in her life now that they are engaged. Its been over 7 years… he has children… the engagement now is kind of inconsequential.

    • ThirdChris says:

      Exactly. I certainly don’t begrudge them their engagement just because they have children, but the real commitment here is building a family together.

    • notpretentious says:

      I agree with you totally. What did anyone think she would say, but she’s over it. It has been YEARS! since the divorce. I think the statement was to wish them well, that’s it.

    • Hipocricy says:

      It’s a family type of marriage because they have young children who were very vocal for them to marry and because they will probably involve all their family, including cousins.

      In that prospect i beleive the engagement is more something Pitt wanted to offer Jolie who was never enganged before and to offer his children the kind of fairytale of a marriage through their innocent eyes, including the step of the engangement.

      I think they are very involved in that celebration, probably already dream about their dresses, outfits, probably have celebrated the engagement of their parents ect…hence all the formal code.

      I can see their footprints in how this is made.

  13. Green_Eyes says:

    Happy for Brad & Angie. It’s their engagement “moment” could care less what Jen thinks. When Jen becomes engaged it will be her & her fiancee’s time to shine. Whoever & whenever that will be. To holdout or wait because of how others perceive it if that were the case is ridiculous. If she and Justin wanted to announce their engagement or make their plans they should. That is what a person who has truly moved on does. In any case. Congratulations to Brad & Angie…and glad Jennifer found her true happiness. Would be nice if we heard nothing else about the latter for a while unless it was something that didn’t involve Brad & Angelina in it. Dare to dream:).

  14. Maya says:

    …meanwhile, in her secret den she returns to take out her two favourite voodoo dolls…

  15. Agnes says:

    i believe she is over it, but she needs to stop playing up the victim role and stop making herself look like she’s still the wronged party. it’s been years, who cares. she needs to stop talking about it, period.

  16. kira says:

    Hasn’t this gone on enough? I don’t get this tit-for-tat business…one gets engaged, let’s ask the other to respond. Ugh… And, now that Aniston is a cheater herself, why do people need to argue anymore? They’re all alike, if you ask me.

    In any case, I hope that the cheaters, their side pieces, boy/girl toys, dungeon slaves, and whomever else are all REALLY, REALLY happy together. Because if they weren’t, that would be SO very tragic. Really. Moving on…

  17. Rhea says:

    “She’s always wanted Brad to be happy (but not Angelina)”—>LMAO

  18. sunmoonstars says:

    She’s an Aquarius, so I can totally believe that she’s been over this for a long time. She’s probably more angry that she can’t remain friends with Brad than she is over anything else that’s happened. But I don’t know her personally, just making a guess since I’m an Aquarius and have lots of relatives that are too.

    • Green_Eyes says:

      I am Aquarius…. Happy for my ex & am friends w/ him & his wife. It didn’t take me 7 yrs to move on, i moved on long before he did. So how does Aquarius fit into it? Not being mean… I don’t get what Aquarius has to do w/ Jen being mad or not.

      • SpunkyPR says:

        So because a tabloid is saying that Jen has moved on, it must mean it took 7 years for her to let go? I’m really sick and tired of the game where a tabloid says something about Brad & Angie, we’re not to believe it but anything they say about Jen is to be believed and vice versa. It’s their lives and just enjoy the entertainment that the tabloids provide. We really shouldn’t read too much into them unless you know for a fact that they’re true and that would mean you are a very very close friend.

      • Green_Eyes says:

        To Spunky PR: 7 yrs, 7 months, 7 days, 7 hrs..or however it took for her to move on….I was just wanting to know what being an Aquarius had to do w/ it, as I am Aquarius, and well heck you read the rest. Curious what about our scope sign says we can or cannot let go..can or cannot move on. Heck I’m happy for her, happy for Ang..hoping both get married & maybe people will quit taking sides. I wasn’t being mean, I was curious. Chill…

  19. LAK says:

    THIS

    “Jen moved on a long time ago, and she is trying to just focus on her own happiness,” a source says of the actress, 43, who will celebrate her 1-year anniversary with boyfriend Justin Theroux in May. Pitt and Jolie announced their engagement last week.

    “Jen is not a bitter person and she has always wanted Brad to be happy,” says the source. The couple divorced in 2005 after five years of marriage.

    “Jen spent many happy years with Brad and thinks their divorce was meant to be,” adds the source. Now living in L.A. with actor-writer Theroux, 40, “she is very happy with Justin – and that’s what she is focusing on right now.”

    is what is annoying about Jen. Too much detail and too much ‘focusing on her own happiness/justin etc’

    This is what fuels the triangle of doom. She should not comment period.

    Putting it out there with emphasis on how happy SHE is simply feels like the lady doth protest too much. How ever she feels about it should be kept private because it is none of our business.

  20. Shay Kay says:

    Brad doesn’t need Jen to be happy for him and she doesn’t have to be happy for him.The whole idea behind divorce is NOT having to deal with what your ex thinks/feels beyond common courtesy. That said I think she isn’t actively unhappy about the engagement but rather more “good for him, nothing to do with me” which is an appropriate response.
    I think he’d say much the same if she and Justin were to marry.

  21. G says:

    I’ll believe it’s over for Anniston when she stops saying it’s over for her.

    Yawn.

  22. Esmom says:

    “Yeah… they didn’t get together last May. They got together months before. They’ve already spent more than a year together.”

    Questioning the timeline, I see. The timeline for the birth of Brangelina is just as fuzzy. Just sayin.

  23. Girl says:

    “homewrecked her piece, she should get to marry him however or whenever she wants.”

    lmao love that. why couldn’t they print that?

  24. janie says:

    I feel like Celebitchy has had this exact same story 3 days in a row.

    …bored.

  25. waq says:

    Do people really think Brad is a catch? I guess I don’t see it and keep wondering what the big deal is.

    • Noi says:

      now stay with me it could be… personal opinion im sure some would say the same about your whoever you had/got

  26. Mrs.Krabapple says:

    She’ll probably keep telling us she’s “moved on” every 6 weeks or so, just so we don’t forget.

    I don’t think Brad as a person is a good catch, but Brad as a career boost is a good catch.

  27. Bird says:

    For God’s sake, leave the woman alone. She has clearly moved on with her life but shouldn’t have to prove that to ANYONE.

  28. Liz says:

    “She homewrecked her piece, she should get to marry him whenever and however she wants.” bitch please!! We should be saying this about Angelina. Jen would never intentionally do that to someone after the hell shes been through. If anyone is in the wrong in the Justin/Heidi thing its Justin and Heidi. I firmly believe Jen is sincere when she says she is over Brad and that she is happy for him. She most likely is rolling her eyes that they are now “engaged”. Like that could make a difference after living together for 7 years and parenting six kids together! The media is the only one making Jen out to be the victim, everyone else (including Brad, Angelina and Jen) are most likely sick of this story.

    • truthSF says:

      @Liz:

      Know that everything you wrote is just your opinion and not facts. Who the hell are you to say what Jen/Brad/Angelina did or didn’t do. They could all be cheaters or not, WE don’t know. but for you to go off on someone else (Kaiser) for doing the same thing as you is very, very hypocritical. If you don’t like what she wrote about your idol, move on like the rest of us. But to get mad like you own this block…, bitch please!!!

      And what “hell” did she go through. Her divorce was nowhere near as tragic as some of our life stories. In fact it was not tragic at all. With child molestation, death of the father of your child, watching your step-father beat the crap out of your mother and older siblings, unless her divorce had any of that included, besides separating amicably, and filing for divorce, and moving on to Vince Vaughn a mere 3 months later, she did not go through “hell”. But she sure did get a whole lot richer, thanks to your sympathy.

      • Lissa says:

        They all did wrong at some point. 2 of them are home wreckers (Angelina AND Jennifer, but AJ has done it at least 2x) and Brad is a cheater. No need to be PC, it’s pretty obvious that they are all guilty of some type of unethical behavior. We weren’t there but I think it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to draw a very probable conclusion to all this, so I agree with you to an extent, especially since there is no evidence of JA “innocently” hooking up w/JT, she looks as guilty as AJ did when she hooked up with her former husband.

        But you are incorrect in saying that a divorce is not tragic “at all” to someone, like you asked the other poster, “Who the hell are YOU to say that?”. I have a few friends who have gone through this and I think they would strongly disagree with you. Many divorcees often say that the end of their marriage, no matter how good or bad it was, felt like some sort of “death” because of the pain and finality that’s associated with it. So, yeah divorce can be pretty traumatic or tragic to some people.

      • Runs with Scissors says:

        @Truth: WORD

  29. fabgrrl says:

    The one year thing…maybe Brad and Angelina were waiting until Jen was in a stable relationship before getting engaged? or at least before announcing their engagement? That would be a quite nice thing to do. I don’t think that Jen herself cares, but I could see Jen and Brangelina’s publicists working out this deal for the public.

  30. skuddles says:

    “Jen spent many happy years with Brad and thinks their divorce was meant to be,”

    What a weird comment. Five years is considered to be ‘many’? And apparently not so happy or the marriage would not have ended in divorce. This sounds rather passive aggressive – why even bring up your former marriage if you’ve truly moved on and are thinking only of the present? Seems like a bit of a sideways slap at Brad & Angie…more so Angie.

    On the other hand, how sad that the media is throwing this in Aniston’s face – you just know they’re hoping to draw blood. Such a never ending gong show.

  31. mollination says:

    erm… they already have kids together. That’s kinda the end-all-be-all of commitment, no? Why would a marriage bother her more than children?

  32. mollination says:

    Oh, that’s right. I get moderated because I said what everyone already knows about this site. My bad. I forgot we’re all supposed to smile and nod.

  33. endoplasmic_ridiculum says:

    Am i the only one who actualy doesn’t hate jen or Angie as much as I hate that insipid wet rag otherwise known as Brad?

    He married someone boring and then dumped her for someone exciting. And then leaves the two women to take the heat in the media.

    What a f*cker. There’s nothing gallant about a guy who trades up. He wasn’t 20 when he got married. He was well into his thirties. He’d dated lots of ppl before. He knew that he wasn’t marrying a super hot international adventuress. Then he dumps the plain one for a super hot, intelligent piece?

    Sorry but I dont care how dumb or annoying Jen is (oh and she IS)… but my point is that he knew all that when he walked down the aisle.

    So no, Brad, no pass from me.

    Ill judge you a lil harsher than either woman thanks very much.

    What are you, recreating Legends of the Fall with two thirty something women?

    ech.

    And you sucked in Troy. Looking out into the sunset squinting does not equate deep thoughts of future battles. And the ending of Moneyball was so lame. SO LAME.

    Ive also noticed the commencement of a strange morph into Falcor: it’s the ever widening nostrils causing you to close in on Leanne. I had hopes you’d go the Robert Redford way but by the time Moneyball lurched to the close I knew the time of Falcor was nigh upon you.

    I’m sorry Brad. I hate that you come out largely unscathed in this stupid Brangelina triangle thing. You’re a cliche dude.

    You take. You use. You grow tired. You swap. You come out clean as a whistle. Pretty standard huh?

  34. LeeLoo says:

    (Be warned as I have unleashed my awesome ranting powers on my fellow readers and commenters)

    I’m glad that the whole triangle thing is coming to an end. However, after reading some of the comments on here I think some things need to be made clear. There’s a reason why people have never liked Jennifer Aniston and I think I understand why people never liked Angelina Jolie either outside of their connection with Brad Pitt.

    For me, I.’ve never liked Jennifer Aniston. Even when I was a 14 year old kid in the late 90s. I thought Jennifer Aniston was a poor actress on Friends and I read one interview in Rolling Stone with her when I was 15 and thought she had to be the most vapid, unaware actress out there. In fairness she grew up in the Hollywood bubble with her soap opra actor father and all signs point to she grew up in a really sheltered Hollywood life. Every interview I have read since has been more of the same vapidness, in the 12 years since I have taken an interest in Hollywood gossip, nothing has changed about her. She’s still unaware, still vapid, still talks about the same boring things of houses, decor, people she hangs out with, her dog(s), her man, her career, I mean the outline hasn’t changed in 15 years. In 2004 when she broke down on Oprah over the end of Friends, she acted like it was the scariest most traumatizing thing in the world going without it (I’m sure other stuff played into that too) but I realized in that moment that this woman has never had to actually deal with a serious problem. The ending of her tv show was as serious as it ever got for her. I have no doubt that her divorce was emotionally devastating for her. I also didn’t mind the love triangle the media portrayed for the first 2-3 years. But after that it got old and it became obvious that Jennifer Aniston was the reason this machine kept running. She constantly played the pity party in the press. She already had the jilted women of the world on her side and deservedly so. The way the situation with Brad played out was poor judgment on Brad’s end. He shpuld have had some respect and at least waited 6 months from the divorce being final before coming out with Angelina. It was poorly handled and Jen had every right to feel jilted and to play that pity card for a few years (even though I never understood what Brad saw in her in the first place). Her personality, the way it played out 100% merited it.

    While I can’t 100% fault Jen for what has happened. I do think she has always been shallow, spoiled and unaware. She doesn’t merit the media attentioned she gets. She’s not a very good actress, I think she was more like her Rachel character on Friends than anyone ever realized. She probably knows a good real estate investment when she sees one. She probably can make smart business decisions but I fail to understand why she mertied 7 years of our time.

    Angelina isn’t any better. I will grant you that I respect her because she is everything Jen Aniston is not. She and Jennifer Aniston probably had parallel upbringings, parents divorced at a young age, both fathers moved on quickly, but Angekina came out the exact opposite person that Jen did. So much so, she’s annoying for the exact opposite reasons Jen is. She basically is that person who tries to hard to empathetic with others less fortunate and tries too hard to save the world. She’s the annoying overachieving goth student who makes a good argument but you question whether she actually knows what she’s talking about. She finds love in strange places and also in not the most appropriate of way. She also finds really weird ways to express her love (see blood vials during her time with Billy Bob). She sometimes gets too deep in the media and talks about things too deep. She also can be too honest (see comments about Shiloh being a blob to her). She’s an overachieving try hard going against Jen’s preppy crowd. She also should have been the one to tell Brad to wait 6 months from the divorce being final before initiating any sort of relationship. Because of the way it got handled she has gotten the flak that she did and rightly so. Although I think many fans of Jen were unlikely to have been Angelina fans in the first place. In fairness, I prefer Angelina over Jen. I’m not an Angeloonie but I do think she has more talent and than Jen does. I also think her and Brad are a better couple and a better match.

    My point is: in many ways Jen and Angie are the same woman and in many ways they are the same but handled their lives in the opposite fashion. In many ways this whole Angeloonie and Jen-Hen fight has turned into the fight you had in high school. Did you hang out with the preppy kids or were you the anti-establishment goth who went out of your way to not be cool? I think your answer to this whole fight lies in there.

    (END RANT)

    • Francesca says:

      I am glad this whole Jolie-this and Aniston-that is coming to an end. As soon as Brad and Jolie becomes Man and Wife, that should officially kick Jen out of this long standing triangle. I find the whole thing rather childish because some men leave their spouses for other women and Aniston is not the first woman this happened to.

  35. JulieM says:

    Sorry, I simply do not understand the blind, searing hatred some commentors here have for either Jen or Angie. They are both flawed human beings. They make mistakes. Geez people. Why so much emotional investment?

    • Kitten says:

      Right? Answer: Because crazy fandom run amok breeds INSANITY. There are a LOT of readers like you and myself who really are indifferent to all three but it can be harrowing trying to post objectively around here so you don’t hear much from the Triangle Non-Committals. Jen-hens and Angeloons are like wild animals-they’ll claw your eyes out.

    • LeeLoo says:

      I guarantee you that many of the Jen Hen’s did not like Angelina to begin with and Angeloonies were probably not Jennifer fans to begin with. It’s kind of like where you were in high school, were you in the cheerleader crowd or the goth crowd? It’s the same sort of division. One person stands for one thing, the other stands for another.

  36. jesstar says:

    I don’t get it either. Like I said in a previous post, the loonies are like Twi-hards, or the LeAnn fans who think its cool to rag on Bradi. The hens aren’t much better with their “Angie is a famewhore” jabs. They are all famewhores, thats why they’re in are in this business! I cringe when I see these posts, but I can’t help but click on them when I need a work distraction LOL. How people get so attached to these people is beyond me.

  37. Sandra says:

    OMG, they have been divorced for longer than they were married – let’s give it up already and let them all move on!

  38. benbeny says:

    That is what happen when everytime she “comment” about Brad. She knows it work up the people. I wish something make her not to speak again all together .lol that may be what makes brad free from her anything after 7 years and 17 men later.

  39. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    LeeLoo,

    Angie is NOTHING like Jen and Brad knows that and stays to enjoy his life with her and their kids.

    See, keeping Brad and kids are 2 obvious differences right there.

  40. Judy says:

    For those who truly believe JA has moved on, I need only to remind you of her ‘friendship’ with Chelsea Handler who only a year and a half ago, spent Thanksgiving with JA and immediately on return abused Angelina and her children in the most horrific way. It was obvious what Handler and Aniston were discussing that Thanksgiving, and it wasn’t politics or fashion. If Aniston was still spiteful towards AJ for those years before a year and a half ago, I do not think she has done a turn-around in a year and a half. After all, she is the one who walked on stage grinning like a Cheshire cat at Handler who abused Angelina and the children in her introducing Aniston piece. Aniston was in on it, that was obvious. She is FAR from over it and she is evil, manipulative and spiteful underneath her ‘sweet’ persona. If it weren’t for Aniston herself and “Team Aniston”, this triangle (that never was) would have been over months after the split. Handler, and her constant digs about Brad, Angelina and talking about her marriage in every interview proves she is not over it. She IS indeed, a very bitter person. And very evil.

    • Josephina says:

      Jennifer should have made no comment at all. There is no need for her to weigh in one way or the other. Why is she even motivated to respond…she is not a part of Brad’s life. There was never a love triangle.

      Did she make a “public statement” about Vince Vaughn’s nuptials or his first born? No.

      Making a permanent and sustained decision to not comment at all to any further comments/actions/events relating to Angie/Brad is how you demonstrate no interest.

      But, alas, Jennifer likes the public attention Mrs. Brad Pitt/Ex-Mrs. Brad Pitt has afforded her.

    • sup says:

      i agree @judy. i don’t believe she has moved on, she never moves on from anything, her hair, stuff she talks about, 90’s fashion, her chicken salad lunch lol… she’s that one not-that-attractive but well known girl in high school who does mean stuff herself but once her prized boyfriend leaves for somebody better, she never ever lets go of that. she reads his facebook, asks about his new g/f, and stalks so much you want to break it to her but you don’t know how to do it without breaking her heart. anyway, i think maybe now she’ll finally move on. and eventually stop with this p.r. campaign where she is trying to top brangie’s news all the time.. she’ll realize slowly that it’s all in vain and move on finally because of the helplessness of her situation

  41. Sara says:

    When you are on your third marriage and you already have half dozen kids with them, it seems silly to make a big deal of it hopefully they keep the wedding small and private.

    • Josephina says:

      AND IF Aniston gets a marriage proposal from Theroux…IT WILL BE HER THIRD ENGAGEMENT……

      I wonder what will you say then, huh?

      Anyone in love has a right to go for marriage no matter what their age or how many times it previously failed. Hopefully you will never be invited to attend to infest your ultra-conservative, cynical views.

      • Sara says:

        I never said they shouldn’t get married. They totally should!!! You totally mis- read the post. I said I hope they don’t make a big show of it since it is her third marriage. Of course people can do whatever they want! Duh. But when its your third marriage I think its a little embarrassing to make a big deal about it in regard to the wedding ceremony.

      • Sara says:

        I feel this way about anyone going on their third marriage, not just Angelina and Brad.

  42. joan says:

    brad better stay with angie or he will end up paying loads of child supports. the only smart thing angie did was to get bunch of kids to keep brad