Comments on: Aniston: ‘America’s sweetheart to America’s spinster’ (not our words)

By: Christian louboutin

Christian louboutin — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:52:45 +0000

It is quite useful.Thanks very much for sharing.

By: Raphael Conveniencia

Raphael Conveniencia — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:27:03 +0000

Excellent! If I could write like this I would be well chuffed. The more I read articles of such quality as this (which is rare), the more I think there might be a future for the Net. Keep it up, as it were.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: jeffrey kilpatrick

jeffrey kilpatrick — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:17:51 +0000

jennifer lets be friends you not just a piece of ass take it easy with the baby we just won two million in a sweepstakes do you love more than one like i do?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: denise

denise — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:40:05 +0000

Jennifer has a charmed life. Her boyfriend John makes her feel young. He’s not marriage material. I hear that he’s “a freak” in the bedroom. On “Oprah” she said the divorce was old. She proud of Brad. It’s time to “let it go, people”.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Codzilla

Codzilla — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:37:31 +0000

Thanks, Mairead

I guess the points I thought I was making so graphically have been watered down a bit.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: mollination

mollination — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:34:21 +0000

I think Jen said that she’s wanted kids and will have them in that Vanity Fair article to nip that rumor (that she’s never wanted kids and cares more about her career so that’s why Brad left) in the bud because it was getting so out of control at the time. But to be perfectly honest, I think she only wanted them if she was in the place for them (ie with someone she really loved, not someone who was merely eligible enough to father children). That’s exactly how I feel. If I’m married to a great man someday and the timing is right, then great, kids may follow. But are kids such a priority that I must find me some eligible sperm by 35 or my life is meaningless? HARDLY!

I think Jen dates fun guys that keep her on her toes, not young guys she wants to “change” to impress Angelina. Jesus, where do people come up with this craziness?

If I were Jen, I’d be so damn happy to have that ass of hers that I’d let the mags make up all the rumors and follow me around all they want just to see another picture of my perfect bum on the cover. haha.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mairead

Mairead — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:14:36 +0000

LOL! Coddie, it’s meant to be someone blushing because they’re embarrassed!

Well, that’s what it’s used for in forums using the pHBB(?) format anyway

I have seen some people use it for when they’re angry, but the grr or evil-annoyed face is better

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Codzilla

Codzilla — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:07:43 +0000

Does represent a person who’s about to vomit, or something else? Because I use it as a way to emphasize something that really grosses me out, but have noticed that others here usually use it in a completely different context. Just curious …

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Mairead

Mairead — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:33:49 +0000

I was trying to be nice. She’s a perfectly nice, likeable woman, but I never feel there’s much substance to her. But if she’s happy that’s the main thing – not matter what the tabs, and some of her more misguided fans and detractors say

And I forgot what the different levels of producers do.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Michelle

Michelle — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:43:29 +0000

Honestly, I can’t decide who is more sexist–this article or Aniston’s crazy fans.

Apparently, this article sees women without men as cannon fodder.(However, Jen running back to douchebag Mayer after he publically humiliates her doesn’t help things either. Saying you’ll never see “that man” Mayer behave like that again is just begging for more humiliation. She needs a clue.)

At the same time, her fans love her mostly because she is the beacon of mediocrity (nothing to be jealous of). You know all those comments about how “real” and “approachable” she is are code words for she’s average and doesn’t make me feel bad. She’s not particulalry talented, her personality is nothing out of the ordinary, and her style is blah. Right now, what she has going for her is the hair, a nice body, and a sweetheart image. IS that what women should aspire to these days? How pathetically backwards. Basically, it’s like telling women if you aspire to be special, then other women will find you intimidating, ignore you, or tear you apart.

What about Cate Blanchett, Charlize Theron, and so forth? These women are unique, interesting, talented, do not indulge in self-pity through the media, not famewhores, and I could go on and on. But, women who are actually special
make us feel bad about ourselves, so that’s why people like Aniston. SO SAD.

Report this comment as spam or abuse