'06
Written by Celebitchy
Posted in Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Brangelina, Fake News, Photos
17 Responses to “Brad and Angelina are not getting married, still dislike Madonna”
-
Well, they went up a notch in my book by not liking the material whore. Other than that, I agree, what is it with parading the kids everywhere?
-
I think it’s refreshing that they actually take care of their own kids. They should have the baby out with the other two, though. They’re parents. That’s why they take their kids with them everywhere.
-
In the beginning I thought Jolie was so kind to take in Maddox and Zahara, but now after Brad joined, it looks more and more a publicity thing. The look more unhappy too and trapped if you ask me.
-
I like how everyone comments that they are so unhappy. Haven’t you people learned from the Jennifer Aniston debacle that looks can be deceiving. Also bear in mind, Angie is a human like everyone who posts here - she is not immune to the hurtful things that people have said about her in the past few years especially now she has children. Nothing hurts a mother more than when their children are hurt and criticised which a fair number of people on blogs do.
-
I’m fresh from reading some unbelievable, racist, narrow-minded crap about Angie and the kids some folks on Just Jared like to post. As to “parading” their kids.. Gwen Stefani takes her kid with her everywhere, I don’t think I’ve seen her w/o her boy once, except when at an event with her hubby. I think it’s adorable and nobody gives her shit about it. So what if they don’t take Shiloh on outings that only older kids would enjoy.. they have three kids and only two pairs of arms, with all the paps on them, it would be hard to control and keep all the kids safe. Maybe they want to make sure that older kids get plenty of parent time–who knows, maybe Shiloh is very demanding of mom’s attention at home? Besides, let’s face it, if they DID take Shiloh with them, you people would say they’re “parading” their bio child. These two will never win as long as they’re gorgeous and don’t try to beg for your sympathy.
-
I’m sorry for igniting this fire, but I strongly believe Angie’s incessive need for media to promote her charity work is now backfiring. It’s an intrution to her children. As much as I admire both Angie and Brad, they need to do their charity work in private and stop with “calling attention to plights”, so that the media doesn’t intrepret every step of their lives as an excuse to flash the blubs.
-
why do i only see them with two of their three kids… thats rather strange
-
Is that Jen posting? or is that Huvane doing her dirty work?
It’s time to move on Jennypo the clock has past your by and I hope you can be happy alone.
-
Shiloh is still an infant. And as someone pointed out, they have three kids now. Hell, my husband and I would be loathe to trot out a five year old, a toddler, and an infant with all the paps around, too.
Once Shiloh is older, you’ll see her out and about, too. Please remember she’s only six months old. When Angelina adopted Maddox, he was older, when she adopted Zahara, she was older. She’s never had to deal much with the paps and a little infant, PLUS two other kids.
-
I’d look unhappy too if everytime I stepped outside the freakin door there was a bunch of assholes shoving a camera in my face. I reckon Angie’s look is just stoic tolerance of the situation and doesn’t reflect at all the state of her relationship. Also, they’re parents, they take their kids everywhere with them - the fact that their every move is chronicled in the press isn’t necessarily their choice. Don’t read stuff that isn’t there.
-
By the way, let’s not forget the fact that the tabloids just LOVE to pick on Angie and Brad. So of course every time they go out, even just for a family outing, they’re pictures are everywhere. So that contributes to the fact that we see pictures of them and their kids so often.
-
Bullshit Anastasia. Zahara was adopted at 6 months of age, Maddox at 7 months & both of them were trotted out for the paparazzi from the beginning. Maddox in a photo op in the park for Us Weekly during Angelina’s PR campaign against “bad husband + abandoning the baby” Billy Bob Thornton (Don’t deny this, it’s ben duly noted & even admitted by Us Weekly that the photos of baby Maddox in the park were arranged by his mother to show her maternal side before her interview to US Weekly in which she trashed her estranged husband Billy Bob) & Zahara in numerous photo ops in Malibu so the world knew she had taken her child home to Brad Pitt’s house. Both of the adopted kids were at the same age or younger then Shiloh is now & she had no problem chucking them in front of the paps.
-
I have mixed feelings about this.
On one hand, I like the fact they always have their kids (minus one, what is up with THAT?) with them. They are parents and it’s nice to see they have their kids with them. And yes, they do get stalked by the press so every move is on film, so there really isn’t avoiding the camera with or without the kids.
On the other hand, where is that baby? Why is she never out in public? Do these people ever stay home? I don’t think I’d want to subject my kids to photographers all the time and I think I’d maybe key down my life a bit just to let my kids lead a normal life without cameras in the face all the time. I understand that their life shouldn’t stop, but would it kill them to spend some time at home too? Kids are resilient and an bounce back really easily, but I wouldn’t want to put them in a position to have to! And I do kind of feel like they use their kids like designer handbags.
-
Mangie’s a moron. She wore “elegant heels” to visit a freaking house in the snow???
And those adopted kids are props. Shiloh is NEVER seen and at 6 months old we saw plenty of Maddox and Zahara. I feel sorry for those kids. They have no stability, just rich spoiled parents.
-
By the way, let’s not forget the fact that the tabloids just LOVE to pick on Angie and Brad. So of course every time they go out, even just for a family outing, they’re pictures are everywhere.
Sam | 12.10.06 - 10:14 pm | #
^^^^
BULL! Brangelina alert the media when it suits them. Curious how none of the paps knew about visting the Wright house yet they still released a photo. Blecch - I loathes these people. -
I always find it funny how people fall for the front Angie and Brad put up. From the very few pictures taken when they think they’re alone - the babyshower pictures and the one where they were in France and kissing inside that shop - they’re very tactile and into each other. But when they’re aware that the cameras are there they change their body language entirely.
They simply feel - both being divorced and having done the public ‘touchy-feely’ thing with other partners that their affection is a private thing.
Also, considering the circumstances of their hook up I’m not suprised they’re presenting a modest front.
I’m waiting to see how they behave with Shiloh and bring her out in public before I conclude whether their taking Zahara and Maddox everywhere with the paps trailing is purely for publicity though.
Mr. T:
slowfreak:
Lee:
Bings:
kailie2:
Shelby:
Britney ain't all that:
Anastasia:
frewtloop:
Jase:
FF:
That’s an...
I agree no one believed wedding rumors.
But I would like to add oil to this burning fire. Why are they always parading the first two, but not the baby? Are they sending a “political” message with the adopted kids?
Call me crazy or insensitive, but seriously (as they say on Grey’s Anatomy),what gives? I’ve never seen anyone in Hollywood exposing their kids (biological or adopted) so much as these two.
Report this comment as spam or abuse