Comments on: Katy Perry’s GHD hair campaign: very pretty or bewigged & ridiculous?

By: CindyQ

CindyQ — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:04:44 +0000

I think Russell is generally well-intentioned but he’s a big phoney and married Katy because their agents told them it would be a good idea. He probably half believes in all his talk for his own self-preservation, but when he married Katy, that said it all to me. He’s apparently ready to settle down with a new GF who is nothing like Katy and she seems really low maintenance and he appears happy. So I guess he got what he wanted in the end. Katy seems like a nasty person and I don’t really consider her as selling out since she was never really ever credible to begin with. I tend to hate on the dumb little children that hand over their parents money before Katy. I mean, girl has to pay her rent right?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Bette

Bette — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:11:30 +0000

I feel the same way about Russell. I know his taste in women has never been too sophisticated, so in that sense it doesn’t surprise me that he went for Katy (looks-wise), but I was so disappointed in him when he married her. He has talked (convincingly, in my opinion) over the years about the emptiness of mass consumerism and the need for a shift in consciousness, so that we value things that matter and not just glittery nonsense. So I could never reconcile how he could be married to Katy Perry with those beliefs. He admittedly is part of that world himself by being an entertainer, but at least he has an awareness and intelligence about it and isn’t anywhere near the level of famewhore/productwhore that Katy is. Oh well, at least they’re divorced now!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: void

void — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:51:51 +0000

Oh, she’s completely insufferable. I was so upset that Russel Brand married her, he’s brilliant [when he's being serious] and she is such a trite piece of fluff. If she was ever anything more than an airheaded pop star she traded that in for a wider, idiotic audience.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Bette

Bette — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:19:29 +0000

Katy Perry is a total hypocrite. She and her supporters love to use buzzwords like natural, authentic, real, etc. to describe her, but it’s all meaningless, because everything about her is synthetic. How is wearing a wig, false eyelashes, and 10 lbs of makeup “natural”?

I also want to throw up when I see her talking as if she’s an “artist” — real artists don’t base half their career around endorsing dozens of products. Let’s see, how many things is she pushing now? ProActiv, GHD, her false eyelashes, Adidas, 2 perfumes, the Sims, and I also saw something about her being chosen as the new spokesperson for Pop Chips. Not to mention that her “documentary” (to use the term loosely) was a tie-in with Pepsi.

If she wants to take advantage of her fame by making obscene amounts of money via these product deals, that’s her prerogative. But to couch it in rhetoric about “art” and “individuality” is disingenuous, to say the least.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: void

void — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:10:16 +0000

Her boobs are real. They look real too. They’re pretty magnificent.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: void

void — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:34:42 +0000

I love her rack. But her legs and her butt leave much to be desired IMO. Her legs are tree trunkish.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Nessa

Nessa — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:17:37 +0000

Umm. I thought her boobies were store bought?? Her bum has a nice shape, but the rest of her is kind of meh. And she is not remotely attractive without a pound of makeup on. Natural Beaty she is not.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Camille (The original)

Camille (The original) — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:30:40 +0000

She might have a ‘nice looking’ bottom but her legs are awful, she has cankles for days. So personally I don’t think her body is all that. JMO.

And yeah, these photos look like ads for wigs!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kristinlistin

kristinlistin — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:48:12 +0000

She looks like Maleficent in the second picture.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: TheOneAndOnly

TheOneAndOnly — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:12:03 +0000

She is such a clueless talentless moron and a complete greedy sell out; if this were berkely in the 60s her cds would be burned for epitomizing corporate shilling; but alas, selling out is so common no one bats an eye; and please an “artist” has that danilo been sniffing too many hair products; she’s an artist as much as running a movie projector is to be an actual director.
And the photoshop is over the top; check out her candids on some of the recent John Mayer posts and compare – two different females.

Report this comment as spam or abuse