Comments on: Jennifer Aniston’s engagement ring is “not that huge” and “understated” http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/ Stylish celebrity escapism Fri, 24 May 2013 04:01:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Laila http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-12555571 Laila Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:34:08 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-12555571 The money from Jennifer's ring was wired from her account. I have proof! The money from Jennifer’s ring was wired from her account. I have proof!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: anneesezz http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11972243 anneesezz Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:30:02 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11972243 Why do people actually believe she is basing her future husband on his sign? Really? Why do people actually believe she is basing her future husband on his sign? Really?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Sal http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11971473 Sal Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:25:07 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11971473 I meant to quote Lilac and agree with their post. I meant to quote Lilac and agree with their post.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Sal http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11971212 Sal Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:34:27 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11971212 Sure of course you would say that. You don't even have the guts to say you're an Aniston fan, which we all know. Undercover only works if you take the time to cover your behind by being even-handed, and you never have even tried. What I want to know is, who is Gossip Rawker in her previous incarnation on here that is spewing all these conspiracy theory nonsense and lies on here straight from FF? Wendy? Olivia (we all know she uses a different name for the Aniston posts than the Jolie ones because she never posts anywhere else as 'Olivia'), 'Someone', Canuck? Newbie my a,ss. Aniston's fans couldn't do a better job of making Aniston look bad, if they tried. Sure of course you would say that. You don’t even have the guts to say you’re an Aniston fan, which we all know. Undercover only works if you take the time to cover your behind by being even-handed, and you never have even tried. What I want to know is, who is Gossip Rawker in her previous incarnation on here that is spewing all these conspiracy theory nonsense and lies on here straight from FF? Wendy? Olivia (we all know she uses a different name for the Aniston posts than the Jolie ones because she never posts anywhere else as ‘Olivia’), ‘Someone’, Canuck? Newbie my a,ss. Aniston’s fans couldn’t do a better job of making Aniston look bad, if they tried.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Sal http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11971178 Sal Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:28:47 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11971178 Lol, nice try, but no dice. The FULL quote was: "They haven’t seen a lot of our films yet, because they are a little young, but I’m looking forward to them one day discovering Mr and Mrs Smith,’ she smiles. ‘They’re going to have a great laugh – to see when their parents actually met, and watch them fall in love and <b>try to kill each other</b>." (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-1087028/Angelina-Jolie-I-think-looks-getting-better-age.html#ixzz24Ry1T12W) Ergo, its obvious she was talking about the <b> characters</b> of John and Jane Smith, falling in love, getting married, and trying to kill each other (their characters were professional assassins trying to kill each other). There was no affair between Brad and Angelina, that hoax was exposed a long time ago, so there was no overlap. For years, you Jen fans went on and on about the now debunked 'overlap' between Brad and Angelina, but you are suddenly quiet and full of excuses when it comes to Justin and Jen's PROVEN overlap. That is pure hypocrisy. As far as Aniston milking the attention: Oh come ON! That you can even say that lie with a straight face Gossip Rawker, is ludicrous. There has not been an interview since 2005 where Aniston has NOT referenced her marriage or divorce in some way. Even the media have picked up on her milking her divorce and riding on it for 8 years. It was even a topic on two Jen fan groups, so even her OWN FANS, noticed it! Every interview she has done since 2005, she has referenced her marriage or divorce. Saying opposite, is just outright lying. She is no Sandra Bullock (who was ACTUALLY cheated on) who has remained classy and silent and didn't do an interview in Vanity Fair where she manipulatively cried on cue the second the VF reporter entered the room. If you think anyone is gong to believe your delusional lie, especially when the EVIDENCE of her own interviews is OVERWHELMING, not to mention her hiring Handler to be an attack dog, you really are beyond delusional. Aniston is a conniving, crafty and manipulative liar who has milked her divorce and ridden into Hollywood on the back of it and fuelled the 'Team Aniston' thing. Aniston is classless and has no dignity or self respect. When she saw she could dupe abnd brainwash people into believing an affair happened (after initially saying it didn't) and boost her popularity like that, she didn't care who she threw under a bus (Brad, Angelina, innocent children) to get what she wanted. She is evil and a master manipulator. You couldn't find a media outlet that hasn't commented on her milking the divorce. Sandra Bullock, she aint! Lol, nice try, but no dice. The FULL quote was: “They haven’t seen a lot of our films yet, because they are a little young, but I’m looking forward to them one day discovering Mr and Mrs Smith,’ she smiles. ‘They’re going to have a great laugh – to see when their parents actually met, and watch them fall in love and try to kill each other.” (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-1087028/Angelina-Jolie-I-think-looks-getting-better-age.html#ixzz24Ry1T12W) Ergo, its obvious she was talking about the characters of John and Jane Smith, falling in love, getting married, and trying to kill each other (their characters were professional assassins trying to kill each other). There was no affair between Brad and Angelina, that hoax was exposed a long time ago, so there was no overlap. For years, you Jen fans went on and on about the now debunked ‘overlap’ between Brad and Angelina, but you are suddenly quiet and full of excuses when it comes to Justin and Jen’s PROVEN overlap. That is pure hypocrisy.

As far as Aniston milking the attention: Oh come ON! That you can even say that lie with a straight face Gossip Rawker, is ludicrous. There has not been an interview since 2005 where Aniston has NOT referenced her marriage or divorce in some way. Even the media have picked up on her milking her divorce and riding on it for 8 years. It was even a topic on two Jen fan groups, so even her OWN FANS, noticed it! Every interview she has done since 2005, she has referenced her marriage or divorce. Saying opposite, is just outright lying. She is no Sandra Bullock (who was ACTUALLY cheated on) who has remained classy and silent and didn’t do an interview in Vanity Fair where she manipulatively cried on cue the second the VF reporter entered the room. If you think anyone is gong to believe your delusional lie, especially when the EVIDENCE of her own interviews is OVERWHELMING, not to mention her hiring Handler to be an attack dog, you really are beyond delusional. Aniston is a conniving, crafty and manipulative liar who has milked her divorce and ridden into Hollywood on the back of it and fuelled the ‘Team Aniston’ thing. Aniston is classless and has no dignity or self respect. When she saw she could dupe abnd brainwash people into believing an affair happened (after initially saying it didn’t) and boost her popularity like that, she didn’t care who she threw under a bus (Brad, Angelina, innocent children) to get what she wanted. She is evil and a master manipulator. You couldn’t find a media outlet that hasn’t commented on her milking the divorce. Sandra Bullock, she aint!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Lilac http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11970871 Lilac Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:28:46 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11970871 Lol, nice try, but no dice. The FULL quote was: "They haven’t seen a lot of our films yet, because they are a little young, but I’m looking forward to them one day discovering Mr and Mrs Smith,’ she smiles. ‘They’re going to have a great laugh – to see when their parents actually met, and watch them fall in love and <b>try to kill each other</b>." (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-1087028/Angelina-Jolie-I-think-looks-getting-better-age.html#ixzz24Ry1T12W) Ergo, its obvious she was talking about the <b> characters</b> of John and Jane Smith, falling in love, getting married, and trying to kill each other (their characters were professional assassins trying to kill each other). There was no affair between Brad and Angelina, that hoax was exposed a long time ago, so there was no overlap. For years, you Jen fans went on and on about the now debunked 'overlap' between Brad and Angelina, but you are suddenly quiet and full of excuses when it comes to Justin and Jen's PROVEN overlap. That is pure hypocrisy. Lol, nice try, but no dice. The FULL quote was: “They haven’t seen a lot of our films yet, because they are a little young, but I’m looking forward to them one day discovering Mr and Mrs Smith,’ she smiles. ‘They’re going to have a great laugh – to see when their parents actually met, and watch them fall in love and try to kill each other.” (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-1087028/Angelina-Jolie-I-think-looks-getting-better-age.html#ixzz24Ry1T12W) Ergo, its obvious she was talking about the characters of John and Jane Smith, falling in love, getting married, and trying to kill each other (their characters were professional assassins trying to kill each other). There was no affair between Brad and Angelina, that hoax was exposed a long time ago, so there was no overlap. For years, you Jen fans went on and on about the now debunked ‘overlap’ between Brad and Angelina, but you are suddenly quiet and full of excuses when it comes to Justin and Jen’s PROVEN overlap. That is pure hypocrisy.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Josephina http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11970393 Josephina Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:53:36 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11970393 Angie met Brad in 2004. By that time, she had already received: 1 Academy Award 2 Golden Globe Awards 3 Screen Actors Guild Awards If you check out Angie's IDMB, you will see that Anige has racked up over 78 nominations in her lifetime AND she is only 36 years old. Angie is a mega-watt film star. Brad and Angie's coupledom put their individual star power in another orbit. They are called the "King and Queen of Hollywood' for a reason. Angie met Brad in 2004.

By that time, she had already received:

1 Academy Award
2 Golden Globe Awards
3 Screen Actors Guild Awards

If you check out Angie’s IDMB, you will see that Anige has racked up over 78 nominations in her lifetime AND she is only 36 years old.

Angie is a mega-watt film star. Brad and Angie’s coupledom put their individual star power in another orbit. They are called the “King and Queen of Hollywood’ for a reason.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: MW http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11970016 MW Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:30:58 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11970016 I am a Gemini and I think I am logical and practical! Maybe I am deluding myself. I think I will take a poll. I am a Gemini and I think I am logical and practical! Maybe I am deluding myself. I think I will take a poll.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: paranormalgirl http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11969536 paranormalgirl Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:30:00 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11969536 There are clearly unstable people of all kinds posting here. There are clearly unstable people of all kinds posting here.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]> By: Monica http://www.celebitchy.com/247436/jennifer_anistons_engagement_ring_is_not_that_huge_and_understated/#comment-11969472 Monica Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:15:13 +0000 http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=247436#comment-11969472 also i swear these jen fans act as if justin is Eric Roth or the Coen brothers OR Sorkin he wrote most of these films with other people and he directed ONE film and it flopped worse than ITLOBH, when jen and justin breakup cant wait to see what the hens will say and yes i don't think they will last because jen can't keep a man and the last two ppl she was engaged to dumped her, Tate said she was too high maintenance also i swear these jen fans act as if justin is Eric Roth or the Coen brothers OR Sorkin he wrote most of these films with other people and he directed ONE film and it flopped worse than ITLOBH, when jen and justin breakup cant wait to see what the hens will say and yes i don’t think they will last because jen can’t keep a man and the last two ppl she was engaged to dumped her, Tate said she was too high maintenance

Report this comment as spam or abuse

]]>