Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jan 1
'07
Britney back as a blonde, will she make a comeback?


Britney’s fake hair has changed color yet again to blonde. The pop singer was out last night at Pure Nightclub, and she was paid six figures to host a New Year’s party where she didn’t even perform.

She looks decent, but her dress is hiked up way too high as usual. If Britney wants to make a comeback, people say she’ll have to quit baring her assets and start acting humble while she focuses on her music.

Spears has circled 2007 as her comeback year, but, two years removed from her last hit, “Toxic,” it’s not clear that the former pop queen will be warmly welcomed back to her throne. Or as Mitch Schneider, publicist for David Bowie and Aerosmith, put it: “I think that waking up on the morning of Jan. 1, 2007, as Britney Spears is not an easy thing to do.”

Given how reluctant she is to take advice, I’m not really sure she’ll be able to pull off a comeback at this point. It’s hit or miss with Britney lately, and she did so much damage by showing us her punani four separate times in a week that I’d say she’s over.

Pictures from Britney-Evolution.

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Britney Spears, Careers, Photos

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

8 Responses to “Britney back as a blonde, will she make a comeback?”

  1. She looks different in the face– maybe its the eybrows that are too light…

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. She just doesnt look as pretty as she did 3-4 years ago, she’s lost it, she really has.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. At the very least she looks like she finally took a shower.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. If Brit wants to have a comeback, perhaps she should get some actual talent.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. Just like the proverbial bad penny (and Madonna), she’ll keep turning up.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. What is it with all the short-short dresses? Less skin is sexier, Brit.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. She looks clean and done but her brows are too light and make her look odd, the dress is an improvement but way too short. I wonder what caused that fainting spell at Pure?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. Hi

    Very sad to see that a lot of people give critic on stars and don’t look at their own life. So wath if she’s wearing a short dress or that here eyebrows are to light???? If you think that’s an interesting topic, get a life!! Because she is famous, doesn’t mean she can do wath ever she wants. There a so may people who get drunk every week when they go out (and also) have childeren. Why is it when it’s Brittne (or some other star) that that is WORLDnews? I say: Brittney, do wath you want, al the people who are not famous and are not all over the media and have the most critic, probably do the same!!!!!!

    Greetings from the Netherlands!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • mardy: This tour is bad. Someone will get badly hurt or killed from the excess of working hours required. There are...
  • Haley: I’ve met her in person on a few occassions and I am amazed at how she looks in photographs and on screen...
  • DLR in Canada: She may have gone a bit overboard as it is quite possible to santize public toilets without having to...
  • Suzy Sunshine: I say Oprah should have the dumb twit on her show and ask her the tough questions that she...
  • S: I agree, actors paid are way way way too much but to admit it like Keith Sutherland did is honest. You don’t...
  • Splenda: I dunno if anybody pointed this out (scanned comments pretty quickly), but she sounds like she did some nose...
  • Cat Steccato: Ok, so did everyone forget GC was married to a great looking, talented, entetainment personality, that...
  • actingrc: trilion - there’s a big diffrence between the peak of the sexual prowess and drive (a widely disputed...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.