Comments on: Angelina Jolie as the Virgin Mary of Walmart

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:36:51 +0000

Jade… what part of satire don’t you understand?

By: skincare

skincare — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:58:34 +0000

http://www.skincareinfo.us

most people don’t think twice about consulting with a doctor
and making an appointment or even about going through the process
of the surgery itself, the status of the patient’s skin after the
fact is often not taken into account

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: exporters

exporters — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:57:43 +0000

http://www.exportersinfo.com

Methods of transfer include a product or good being mailed,
hand-delivered or downloaded from an internet site.
It can be sent in the form of a facsimile, email or during
a telephone conversation.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sara

Sara — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:07:58 +0000

Awesome painting! Love the satire. I personally like Angelina Jolie but hate Brad Pitt.

I don’t know why some people dislike her so much. Just because she’s beautiful, etc…. Also she seems sincere, mature, and humble in her interviews. However, she was stupid to take Brad Pitt. He’s just so annoying!! She needs a better man.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Krista

Krista — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:50:53 +0000

Wow.

Sad.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jade

Jade — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:08:37 +0000

First and foremost, Angelina is far from Mother Mary. As much as she portrays to be a good role, the public are not going to buy that she did not entice someone else’s husband to have an affair with her. Wasnt it also a huge thing for her at the time to have a lesbian relationship? Even if it werent true, it is very insulting to Mother Mary to be even compared to a woman with wordly earthly woman. For one Angelina is not humble.

The artist should be boycotted and is looking for attention. The artist intended this to happen to make a name for herself. It is the artist that should be criticized, the artist do not respect the image of the Virgin Mary.

Write your critics to the artist.This is her name> KATE KRETZ.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: julie

julie — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:04:53 +0000

Yes, art is interpreted in the eyes of it’s beholders. My concern is that Kevin is claiming the artist’s intent. I suspect the artist would be thrilled that there are so many interpretations, and not a single one is wrong, but to say that “I know the artist” and “this is what the artist meant” is damning to the work, if that isn’t true. Others who read this forum, unaware that some people have posted under multiple names, etc. could wrongly think that the artist is communicating something that he/she isn’t.

If what the artist meant really is that AJ is a “whore” with “fat lips” then so be it. I don’t care about the interpretations or what it really means. I do care when people lie and coerce others into believing something that isn’t true.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Clarimonde

Clarimonde — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:22:06 +0000

Julie, give me a break. What makes youu think that the art is being misrepresented? Whether or not Kevin is a friend of the artist is neither here nor there. In the end art will be interpreted through the eyes of each individual. All artists know this. Everyone might not get the meaning which was implied when the art was conceived. Most artists will let the creation speak for itself rather than worrying about how it is represented or mis-represented by the public.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: julie

julie — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 14:09:14 +0000

Celebitchy, is it at all possible to contact the artist? Kevin claims that he is a friend of the artist and I am suspect that that isn’t true. In which case the artist should know that his/her work is being misrepresented in a public forum.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kevin

Kevin — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:45:02 +0000

Kerri and Terri Ann u are it!!! U made my day. What better way to say express lane/12 items or less than this short-attention-span whore whose only saving grace is daddys money and fat lips ! You obviously got the irony, or should i say pathos, that this gifted artist, a friend of mine, was striving for. Yes a subtext is perhaps the rabid attention we give tabloid fodder like Jolie and her transparent celebrity spin of the moment, but even more important is how those of us who are real can at the end of the day see through her phony transparency, laugh together at her, and in so doing remind ourselves of what’s real. Not the bimbo who makes more than she’s worth and fools the public by adopting an African baby as an accessory, but real honest to God people like us.

Report this comment as spam or abuse