<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jennifer Aniston: &#8216;we&#8217;re just trying to entertain you, don&#8217;t shoot the messenger&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/</link>
	<description>Stylish celebrity escapism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of British</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-161616</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of British</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-161616</guid>
		<description>Sasha - &quot;Her standard language from the interviews I’ve read recently seems somewhat cocky mixed with silly slang, psychobabble and profanity. It’s nothing like the breezy fun person she appears to be on Friends.&quot;

The &quot;breezy fun person she appears to be on Friends&quot; was a ficticious character...  Rachel was not real.  Comprendez?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasha &#8211; &#8220;Her standard language from the interviews I’ve read recently seems somewhat cocky mixed with silly slang, psychobabble and profanity. It’s nothing like the breezy fun person she appears to be on Friends.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;breezy fun person she appears to be on Friends&#8221; was a ficticious character&#8230;  Rachel was not real.  Comprendez?
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=161616">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hallie--</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-161434</link>
		<dc:creator>Hallie--</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-161434</guid>
		<description>I personally can&#039;t figure out whether Aniston is a raging idiot, or she&#039;s a drama queen who loves throwing fuel on the fire. If you&#039;re a fan, stop reading now.

She has a habit of saying the worst things, fueling more tabloid drama.

1. She stopped talking to her mother b/c mom wrote an awful tell-all book, then she talked about their split over and over on Oprah, Diane Sawyer, and in Rolling Stone, etc. Double standards much? 

2. After the tabloids said their marriage was on the rocks, she responded that she didn&#039;t know whether Pitt was the love of her life and was still wondering, fueling even more tabloid gossip about their faltering marriage. Stupid!

3. Asked about Angelina, she actually answers the question, then blames Vogue for going &quot;tabloid&quot;?  She could&#039;ve chosen to say, &quot;that&#039;s so yesterday,&quot; but no.  Again, she fuels the tabloid speculation even further. Same PR tactic??

4. She says Mayer is &quot;inexperienced&quot; with the celeb. press to excuse his blabbing to TMZ about their break-up. Then, says &quot;you won&#039;t hear from that man again.&quot; Then, she talks about their relationship in interview after interview, gushing about his &quot;guitar ability&quot; and what not. Hypocrite much? 

Seriously, I used to be a fan of this woman, but I am not an idiot. Jen obviously loves adding fuel to the tabloid fire, then playing Ms. Innocent and blaming someone else. Sorry, I don&#039;t buy the act anymore; it&#039;s just sad. Grow up!  

Anyways, I&#039;m no fan of Angelina either, much for the same reason.  She loves the tabloids too much and it&#039;s cost her career-wise and PR-wise, I feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally can&#8217;t figure out whether Aniston is a raging idiot, or she&#8217;s a drama queen who loves throwing fuel on the fire. If you&#8217;re a fan, stop reading now.</p>
<p>She has a habit of saying the worst things, fueling more tabloid drama.</p>
<p>1. She stopped talking to her mother b/c mom wrote an awful tell-all book, then she talked about their split over and over on Oprah, Diane Sawyer, and in Rolling Stone, etc. Double standards much? </p>
<p>2. After the tabloids said their marriage was on the rocks, she responded that she didn&#8217;t know whether Pitt was the love of her life and was still wondering, fueling even more tabloid gossip about their faltering marriage. Stupid!</p>
<p>3. Asked about Angelina, she actually answers the question, then blames Vogue for going &#8220;tabloid&#8221;?  She could&#8217;ve chosen to say, &#8220;that&#8217;s so yesterday,&#8221; but no.  Again, she fuels the tabloid speculation even further. Same PR tactic??</p>
<p>4. She says Mayer is &#8220;inexperienced&#8221; with the celeb. press to excuse his blabbing to TMZ about their break-up. Then, says &#8220;you won&#8217;t hear from that man again.&#8221; Then, she talks about their relationship in interview after interview, gushing about his &#8220;guitar ability&#8221; and what not. Hypocrite much? </p>
<p>Seriously, I used to be a fan of this woman, but I am not an idiot. Jen obviously loves adding fuel to the tabloid fire, then playing Ms. Innocent and blaming someone else. Sorry, I don&#8217;t buy the act anymore; it&#8217;s just sad. Grow up!  </p>
<p>Anyways, I&#8217;m no fan of Angelina either, much for the same reason.  She loves the tabloids too much and it&#8217;s cost her career-wise and PR-wise, I feel.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=161434">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-160738</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-160738</guid>
		<description>Aniston has more class in one little finger than Angelina will ever have in her life time. She is living her life but there is an elephant in the room she cannot ignore. She has acted with diginity through all this. 

Brangelinites like seeing things through their tinted glasses. Angelina is always saying the  F word and they still think she has class. Thankfully 90% of the public thinks she is trash. Now she poses with Brad&#039;s parents. Obviously it is another PR ploy. She actually looks high in those pictures Cheyenne and her manic laugh reeks of desperacy. Brad looks like &#039;enough already, if you carry on like that, no one will buy our &#039;happy family&#039; PR&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aniston has more class in one little finger than Angelina will ever have in her life time. She is living her life but there is an elephant in the room she cannot ignore. She has acted with diginity through all this. </p>
<p>Brangelinites like seeing things through their tinted glasses. Angelina is always saying the  F word and they still think she has class. Thankfully 90% of the public thinks she is trash. Now she poses with Brad&#8217;s parents. Obviously it is another PR ploy. She actually looks high in those pictures Cheyenne and her manic laugh reeks of desperacy. Brad looks like &#8216;enough already, if you carry on like that, no one will buy our &#8216;happy family&#8217; PR&#8217;.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=160738">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lia</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-160698</link>
		<dc:creator>Lia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-160698</guid>
		<description>Aniston looks like she has a really good plastic surgeon, and Wilson looks like he really needs an appointment with one.  My goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aniston looks like she has a really good plastic surgeon, and Wilson looks like he really needs an appointment with one.  My goodness.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=160698">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasha</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-160519</link>
		<dc:creator>sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-160519</guid>
		<description>I used to be a Jen fan... but in the past few months it&#039;s diminished a bit. I used to think she was moderately intelligent, and she had a cool natural style that reminds me of my quirky/cute friends.

But then she opened her mouth a few months ago, and scaaary stuff came out. Calling someone &quot;uncool&quot; is so inredibly lame and second grade... can&#039;t imagine any celeb using a word so stupid to describe such an emotional situation lol it sounds more like something John&#039;s ex, Jessica would say!

Her standard language from the interviews I&#039;ve read recently seems somewhat cocky mixed with silly slang, psychobabble and profanity. It&#039;s nothing like the breezy fun person she appears to be on Friends.

At the moment she strikes me as unintelligent, full of herself and somewhat silly. Too bad. I still hope the movie is good and love Owen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a Jen fan&#8230; but in the past few months it&#8217;s diminished a bit. I used to think she was moderately intelligent, and she had a cool natural style that reminds me of my quirky/cute friends.</p>
<p>But then she opened her mouth a few months ago, and scaaary stuff came out. Calling someone &#8220;uncool&#8221; is so inredibly lame and second grade&#8230; can&#8217;t imagine any celeb using a word so stupid to describe such an emotional situation lol it sounds more like something John&#8217;s ex, Jessica would say!</p>
<p>Her standard language from the interviews I&#8217;ve read recently seems somewhat cocky mixed with silly slang, psychobabble and profanity. It&#8217;s nothing like the breezy fun person she appears to be on Friends.</p>
<p>At the moment she strikes me as unintelligent, full of herself and somewhat silly. Too bad. I still hope the movie is good and love Owen.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=160519">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-159982</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-159982</guid>
		<description>Cheyenne:  Again your post shows that you are unable to move on.  Jolie is known as a homewrecker because the media has called her that.  What you are saying is the same as saying that fans of Rosetta Getty are the only ones calling Sienna Miller a homewrecker. Angie and Brad had an affair - the media calls anyone who admits to loving a married person and is involved with that person when the marriage ends a homewrecker. It has nothing to do with Jen fans.  Sienna Miller will always be known as a homewrecker regardless of whether that marriage was over before they got together or not.  That is how the media is.  Angie being known as a homewrecker has nothing to do with Jen.  You really need to move on.  Angie and Jen have nothing to do with each other.  Unfortunately the Brad/Angie fans continue to insist they do and continue to post about them in the same posts.  Really sad.  Move on. It is beyond me why someone would post a picture of Brad/Angie at a premiere on a Jen post?  Can you explain the motive behind that.  It is just to weird.  It is the Brad/Angie fans who cannot stop talking about Jen not visa versa.   But whatever the interesting thing is that thanks to Brad/Angie fans Jen gets more coverage than ever.  So go at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheyenne:  Again your post shows that you are unable to move on.  Jolie is known as a homewrecker because the media has called her that.  What you are saying is the same as saying that fans of Rosetta Getty are the only ones calling Sienna Miller a homewrecker. Angie and Brad had an affair &#8211; the media calls anyone who admits to loving a married person and is involved with that person when the marriage ends a homewrecker. It has nothing to do with Jen fans.  Sienna Miller will always be known as a homewrecker regardless of whether that marriage was over before they got together or not.  That is how the media is.  Angie being known as a homewrecker has nothing to do with Jen.  You really need to move on.  Angie and Jen have nothing to do with each other.  Unfortunately the Brad/Angie fans continue to insist they do and continue to post about them in the same posts.  Really sad.  Move on. It is beyond me why someone would post a picture of Brad/Angie at a premiere on a Jen post?  Can you explain the motive behind that.  It is just to weird.  It is the Brad/Angie fans who cannot stop talking about Jen not visa versa.   But whatever the interesting thing is that thanks to Brad/Angie fans Jen gets more coverage than ever.  So go at it.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=159982">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheyenne</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-159956</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheyenne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-159956</guid>
		<description>LOL!  &quot;No one really cares&quot;?!  Is that why the Aniston fans are still bashing Angelina as a home-wrecker four years after the split?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  &#8220;No one really cares&#8221;?!  Is that why the Aniston fans are still bashing Angelina as a home-wrecker four years after the split?
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=159956">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-159886</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-159886</guid>
		<description>&quot;being dumped by every man she dates&quot;  I am not sure how you think that you know this.  What exactly happened to her and vince or her and Paul.  I don&#039;t think that she was dumped but that both parties decided to end the relationships.  Again you need to actually tell facts.  If Vince or Paul have stated that they dumped her please post.


&quot;publicly humiliated&#039;  I assume you are refering to Brad here?  He is the only one who has humiliated her.

And see the bottom section of your post is the problem.  Brad and Jen live seperate lives now and why would you bring up Brad/Angie and the in-laws on a Jen post.  No one really cares.  The Brad/Angie fans need to move on and quit connecting these two together.  It is over.  Move on.  Jen has moved on you need to as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;being dumped by every man she dates&#8221;  I am not sure how you think that you know this.  What exactly happened to her and vince or her and Paul.  I don&#8217;t think that she was dumped but that both parties decided to end the relationships.  Again you need to actually tell facts.  If Vince or Paul have stated that they dumped her please post.</p>
<p>&#8220;publicly humiliated&#8217;  I assume you are refering to Brad here?  He is the only one who has humiliated her.</p>
<p>And see the bottom section of your post is the problem.  Brad and Jen live seperate lives now and why would you bring up Brad/Angie and the in-laws on a Jen post.  No one really cares.  The Brad/Angie fans need to move on and quit connecting these two together.  It is over.  Move on.  Jen has moved on you need to as well.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=159886">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nina</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-159833</link>
		<dc:creator>nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-159833</guid>
		<description>Not everyone has their ego driven exclusively by their relationships with men. Relationships with men (actually - &quot;romantic relationships&quot; would be a more PC way of saying it) is just a tiny part of a successful woman&#039;s life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone has their ego driven exclusively by their relationships with men. Relationships with men (actually &#8211; &#8220;romantic relationships&#8221; would be a more PC way of saying it) is just a tiny part of a successful woman&#8217;s life.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=159833">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geronimo</title>
		<link>http://www.celebitchy.com/25430/jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger/#comment-159774</link>
		<dc:creator>geronimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebitchy.com/?p=25430#comment-159774</guid>
		<description>Mairead - Nice analogy! And by patience, I was admiring the calm, rational way in which you responded to eye-rolling rubbish! 8)  

Re fascination. Yes, I am fascinated. At how this very ordinary, bland woman, despite being a very one-dimensional actress and having so little of interest to say,  continues to get the amount of attention she does. That IS fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mairead &#8211; Nice analogy! And by patience, I was admiring the calm, rational way in which you responded to eye-rolling rubbish! <img src='http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Re fascination. Yes, I am fascinated. At how this very ordinary, bland woman, despite being a very one-dimensional actress and having so little of interest to say,  continues to get the amount of attention she does. That IS fascinating.
<p align="right"><small><a href="http://www.celebitchy.com/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=159774">Report this comment as spam or abuse</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- W3 Total Cache: Db cache debug info:
Engine:             memcached
Total queries:      30
Cached queries:     3
Total query time:   0.022
SQL info:
    # | Time (s) |    Caching (Reject reason)     |   Status   | Query
    1 |    0.001 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | SELECT option_name, option_value FROM wp_options WHERE autoload = 'yes'
    2 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'akismet_comment_nonce' LIMIT 1
    3 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'bad_behavior_settings' LIMIT 1
    4 |        0 |  disabled (query is rejected)  | Not cached | CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `wp_bad_behavior` (
		`id` INT(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
		`ip` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`date` DATETIME NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
		`request_method` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`request_uri` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`server_protocol` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`http_headers` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`user_agent` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`request_entity` TEXT NOT NULL,
		`key` TEXT NOT NULL,
		INDEX (`ip`(15)),
		INDEX (`user_agent`(10)),
		PRIMARY KEY (`id`) );
    5 |        0 |            enabled             |   Cached   | SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'IWG_RoleMan_Spaces_in_Caps' LIMIT 1
    6 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT comment_date_gmt FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 1
    7 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT   wp_posts.* FROM wp_posts  WHERE 1=1  AND wp_posts.post_name = 'jennifer_aniston_were_just_trying_to_entertain_you_dont_shoot_the_messenger' AND wp_posts.ID = 25430 AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post'  ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC
    8 |    0.003 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT wp_comments.* FROM wp_comments  WHERE comment_post_ID = '25430' AND comment_approved = '1'  ORDER BY comment_date_gmt DESC LIMIT 10
    9 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT t.*, tt.*, tr.object_id FROM wp_terms AS t INNER JOIN wp_term_taxonomy AS tt ON tt.term_id = t.term_id INNER JOIN wp_term_relationships AS tr ON tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id WHERE tt.taxonomy IN ('category', 'post_tag', 'post_format') AND tr.object_id IN (25430) ORDER BY t.name ASC
   10 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT post_id, meta_key, meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id IN (25430)
   11 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 161616
   12 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 161616
   13 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 161434
   14 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 161434
   15 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 160738
   16 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 160738
   17 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 160698
   18 |    0.005 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 160698
   19 |    0.001 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 160519
   20 |    0.004 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 160519
   21 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 159982
   22 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 159982
   23 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 159956
   24 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 159956
   25 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 159886
   26 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 159886
   27 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 159833
   28 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 159833
   29 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(comment_date) time, comment_author_IP, comment_date_gmt, comment_post_ID, comment_ID  FROM wp_comments where comment_ID = 159774
   30 |        0 |            enabled             | Not cached | SELECT meta_value FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = 25430 and meta_key = 159774
-->
