Comments on: Angelina Jolie answers Madonna’s dig, one ups her

By: Fabulous

Fabulous — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 03:52:15 +0000

I agree,
some people are not happy campers

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Truest Again

Truest Again — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:52:50 +0000

Damaged people also feel the need to lash out at other people, regardless of weather they love themselves or not.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Truest Again

Truest Again — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:50:08 +0000

And having an oscar has nothing to do with levels of compassion, obviously, I just meant that she is accomplished and doesn’t need to create hype for herself… neither does madonna, who is just a lot older than angelina and has to try to remain relevant in the pop game, though she is here to stay, regardless of her age. Loving onesels is also very important, but arrogance is a big turn off in anyone, regardless of their levels and perceptions of self worth.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Truest Again

Truest Again — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:00:02 +0000

I don’t think of it as being gullible, Its common sense. Maybe not bad but unfeeling self centered people wouldn’t waste their time thinking about other people, so being good doesn’t enter the picture. Your a good person if you don’t bring harm to others or try to hurt people. You can love yourself, but when one strikes out at other people that never did anything to them to make a point they step over the line…Giving to charity has nothing to do with being a good person, if meglomaniacs use it to make themselves look better, it doesn’t comes from the heart. And I think Angie and Brad are caring people. They get enough publicity just being an item. She has an oscar, she doesn’t need to do charity work to have people form opinions about her level of compassion, unlike Madonna, who I think is great, but lacks in the social, feeling skills category in regard to how she percieves and treats others. Hope this clarifies things.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Domidroid

Domidroid — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 08:44:22 +0000

I’ll never give a cent to Charity, and I’ll never feel guilty about it either.
Why does all this bleeding-heart-bullshit automatically = goodness? It’s just too easy! Don’t be so gullible!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Domidroid

Domidroid — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 08:39:03 +0000

Does not caring about ones self make them a “good person”? if so, why? other people just want you to hate yourself, like they do, what good can only caring about them bring?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Truest Again

Truest Again — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 08:16:37 +0000

I also want to add that I think Madonna has goodness in her heart too, but her motives or a little misguided at times, regardless. At least she is making a difference, though she could stand to put a little more money to charities instead of supposedly “raising” 3 or so million for her orphan center, she could whip out a personal check alone. 31 million for a kaballah center , and angie gives 1/3 of her salary, with no strings attached? Makes you think, or wonder what other people are thinking huh Madonna?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Truest

Truest — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 07:37:47 +0000

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are good people who donate their time and money to help poor people. Angelina’s poor mother is dying from cancer and she’s doing charity work, running herslef ragged. I think that goes far beyond posing for ten minutes as Madge has said. Madonna is pissed because she tought she was going to be respected like angelina for adoption, and it backfired on her, because she supposedly fell in love with little david, but there were all these strings attached. And people don’t adore Madonna for anything but her performance abilities and talent, because she is cut throat acting and has been quite nasty and arrogant. Angelina is quite the oposite. If Madonna truly had the boys best interests at heart, which I think she does to a certain extent, she wouldn’t have taken a low pot shot at angie to the press, because it wouldn’t have mattered to her what people said if she was truly into the child 100 percent. She wants people to follow Kaballah and her ways of so called new morality, yet she openly let the cat out of the bag and showed her resentment to Angelina. Pretty pathetic, and I am a huge fan of madonna by the way. I didn’t like what she said at all about angelina.
She is also causing strife within her marriage, for her husband is pals with brad pitt. Madonna rocks, but it is all about her. Angelina cares, when she cries its real tears, not tears for herself.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: MaiGirl

MaiGirl — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:16:35 +0000

My point, Action, is not that I blame the children, but that I’m tired of Julia parading her spawn around(who do, like it or not, resemble Children of the Corn)as if they erase her dirty deeds. Sure, she’s Mother of the Year. Just ask Vera.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: countrybabe

countrybabe — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:28:33 +0000

Angelina is the first celebrity now that I’ve heard the UN using, after that Nic, her friend. Why would they want Madonna. Stealing one baby is getting at the root cause. Yeah right. She didn’t know what else to say. Angelina adopted first. Making Madge look like a copycat.

Report this comment as spam or abuse