Comments on: Is Paul McCartney actually the mean mofo that Heather claims?

By: Pookie

Pookie — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:17:31 +0000

Has anyone read anything about Sir Paul…..I have, years before Heather was in the picture, and the impression I get is that his “image” of the “good” Beatle is just that,an image.
I read that Linda McCartney was rather mean and nasty to HER daughter Heather, and actually left her with friends or relatives whilst she went to hook up with “Sir” Paul. Gee, nice mother.
Both Linda and Paul were heavy drug addicts, and yes (duh) that affects both your judgment and personality.

Paul is not the modern, progressive guy his silly, deluded groupies wish him to be. Quite the backwards misogynist as a matter of fact.

I consider myself blessed to be smart and bright enough not to fall for all the “Good” Beatle garbage.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: JoDee

JoDee — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:49:48 +0000

Guiliano is a piece of garbage. He’s written dozens of worthless Beatles books that are all completely inaccurate and rumour-ridden only to make a buck. Mills, too, is a worthless gold digger with a lifetime of lies and deception. Anyone who really believes her accusations should shoot themselves. Dishing ”dirt” for dough? Birds of a feather. So what if McCartney is an asshole sometimes? He’s written most of the world’s greatest songs ever and that’s all anyone should give a hell about. Let it go.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: xiaoecho

xiaoecho — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:30:30 +0000

I believe her and have from the start..the press were labelling her a goldigger from the day their relationship was made public.

They (the Beatles) might be quasi saints to the public but dont forget they started out as working class lads bought up with working class mores

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Britney ain't all that

Britney ain't all that — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:48:51 +0000

Look I don’t think Paul is a saint, in fact he’s only a man but I do think it’s very suspicious that Paul paid $380,000.00 for old tapes of Linda talking about her problems with Paul.

I do think Paul is a bully and the treatment to his family is proof of that…to remind his family that because he brought them the house he didn’t have to respect their rules, tell me he is selfish and would override anyone opinions to get his ways.

I also don’t see Heather as Mother Teresa either but Paul did married her and they’re divorcing so issues will come up.

Feeling up his step-sister was not right and shouldn’t be condone, you can tell she never got over that.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Domidroid

Domidroid — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:38:47 +0000

The fact that she’s married to a Knight, and still dumb enough to carry her own bags, is not a point of sympathy. I stand by all posts that characterize her as cheap baggage that Sir Paul is better off without. Should have left her where he found her, strictly one-night-stand material.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: amyhalo

amyhalo — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:33:39 +0000

When was this? 1964? Thankfully, no one did anything pompous or stupid in their twenties. What a lout!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: GeorgiaCajun

GeorgiaCajun — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:44:44 +0000

kailie2 - Get a grip. I never said Paul abused her. Why can’t you read what I said. I think it is pathetic that people are automatically calling this woman a liar, you don’t know her and you don’t know Paul. Get some education on domestic violence. You acting like you know them b/c you read an article or saw something in the news is pathetic. You obviously need a life.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Other Karen

Other Karen — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:42:31 +0000

Not sure about the rest, but the stories of him emphasizing that the house is his is consistent with a lot of Heather’s earliest complaints, revealed by her friend. Paul always had someone to carry his bags, while one-legged Heather would have to carry her own. And Paul would shuffle his appointment schedule around like crazy when they traveled, and expected Heather shuffle her own appointments around to accomodate that.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Matt

Matt — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:51:46 +0000

I like how calm and reasonable you are with these sorts of things. Good post.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kailie2

kailie2 — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:45:04 +0000

Yes, I agree that a lot of domestic abuse is often hidden but Paul and Heather are not exactly a typical couple. Heather is a very outspoken person to say the least, she was never dependent on him for money and they had staff in the house — if there was any abuse, sooner or later someone would have said something. It would have been leaked to someone– a friend, a housekeeper or a family member if not to the press. The point is she’s only making it after HE filed for divorce (which she didn’t expect) and cut her off. Not only that, but she’s made thinly veiled allegations that he sexually abused their child. She didn’t have the guts to allege it officially but made sure to leak the crap to the press. I’ve seen women who do this kind of thing, with no basis whatsoever, only to destroy a man in a divorce. Anything goes, even the well-being of their children. Just how do you expect Paul to prove he DID NOT abuse her? The burden is on her to show there was abuse and the only thing those tapes prove is that he didn’t have a great relationship with his step-family (who sound like they relied on him for money but it was never enough). I think that Heather is an unbalanced egomaniac with serious mental issues. As far as tapping a 13 year-old on the ass–crass and inappropriate but not necessarily abuse. It all depends on a) what really happened (we have her side of the story) and b) the context in which it happened. They sound bitter and disappointed they didn’t get more out of Paul and are willing to smear him for a fee the tabloid no doubt paid them for the story.

Report this comment as spam or abuse