Comments on: Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt picked up their wedding bands: is the wedding soon?

By: Karma

Karma — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:05:54 +0000

Yes, and Vogue wrote a lovely article on the wife while Barbara Walters is tied to them as well.

The Assads’ were doing press, building the nation’s pr for the new century. It was a wise thing to try and attract investment dollars while painting themselves as progressive rulers of the Middle East. That AJ was dining with them makes perfect sense. With the wife doing Vogue, the Barbara Walters connection and eventual interview, as well as, getting friendly with the UN Goodwill Amb who is also a movie star. They hit all of the media markets. Magazine, tv, movies, and political by dinning with the UN Goodwill Amb.

Anyway, the fact that Angelina cares about refugees is exactly the job description. It’s what she’s meant to do. So it’s bizarre to be upset over her talking about refugees. Seriously, you are upset you’ve heard about Angelina and the refugees but are certain nothing is done to help them? You might want to look into the mirror then. Her job is to inform people and she did, you’re aware, that you didn’t do anything is on you. At least she donated money to the cause and she has inspired others to do so, as well.

Personally, I think she enjoys the effort of trying to help and feels genuine empathy for the people she advocates for. To be in her position/famous and not do something would be worse.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Heck Yeah

Heck Yeah — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:29:00 +0000

I think they are both HOTT and I would do them at the same time! YEP! I would! I don’t find them boring whatsoever!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: lisa2

lisa2 — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 02:06:13 +0000

wait wait wait wait.

I need more info on that part about her father.

I don’t think there is anything wrong with not wanting to parent children. I don’t and would never be negative about any woman or man that feels that way. I am always honest with the men in my life about that. ALWAYS up front from the start. No misconceptions. Because if a man felt the way I did and didn’t tell at the go or lie to me. I’m sure people would be mad and call him all kinds of names.

but I’m curious about her father and when this was said. NEWS to me.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Blood&Sand

Blood&Sand — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:04:51 +0000

Me 5

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Emma - the JP Lover

Emma - the JP Lover — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:22:15 +0000

@Bcgirl, who wrote: “anyone else think the timing here might have something to do with a widely ridiculed Chanel commercial?”

Friday after work I went to our downtown Macy’s department store (right next to our Tiffany’s store). After all the talk about the ridicule Brad’s Chanel commercials have received and how the campaign has flopped, I was quite surprised to find a huge black and white photo of Brad Pitt right in front of the store’s main entrance. The photo was the backdrop for a Chanel display featuring fragrance for both Men and Women. If his campaign was the failure Jen’s fans all claim it to be, I doubt the display featuring Brad’s face would have been placed in such a prominent location.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: JudyK

JudyK — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:11:26 +0000

SUch a shame there are so mentally ill people out there. To hate someone so badly that you never met , and never will and who did nothing wrong to you has to be a form of mental illness. Worshiping JA the way some do is really a joke.
Brad and Angie have come so far these past few years. They are together , they have their kids and a good life. They donate millions of dollars to chairties and have helped the people of La with homes for the people who lost everything from the levees breaking and Angie goes to one war torn country to another to help. You know instead of people yelling about the divorce I never hear her fans talk about JA and her aid for breast cancer people. All they do is feel sorry for her and her being dumped when in fact she is the one that wanted a divorce lol..
I doubt if AJ goes to war torn countries for PR when she could get killed or taken hostage. Where do these people get these ideas?
They are horrible parents ,? lol NO way . My daughter was a Navy Brat and she has been places that some will never see and she was always talking about them and how much fun she had and how many languages she could speak. What is so wrong with that? They take good care of their kids. They keep saying JA wanted kids well her father just said that he was disappointed because she told him she didnt want kids. She never wanted kids and her mistake was lieing to Pitt about that. He wanted kids and begged her to have a family but she wanted a career. Does this make JA a bad person ? NO. BUT she should have been honest about it instead of puting the blame on BP for the failure of the marriage. Brad and Angie have what they always wanted, a family and love . I hope they last because they are good people and give and help others. Haters who have you helped today ?? They give millions to charity and people say they do it for pR well that money is public and the papers print it , B&A don;t tell the papers. They gave the money for their kids pictures to charity and by doing so they stopped the chance of someone getting hurt by the paps trying to get a picture. Remember Diana? I hope they marry and I personally would liketo see a small but formal wedding the girls being flower girls and the boys ring bearers. I think AJ would make a beautiful bride and he a great looking groom and the kids all dressed up and being part of it would be great. I would love to see JA and Justin go to prove that all of this crap is over and maybe the haters will stfu and go away.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: lisa2

lisa2 — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:54:05 +0000

Funny.. but that would only be a story if Justin invited Jon Voight.

the press and her fans need the connection and I just don’t understand it. I guess her happy in love and getting married is not enough unless you can still attach her to Brad. SMH

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: orange

orange — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 07:46:14 +0000

LemonNLime-

There’s more to it than just oil. It has to do with central banking, national sovereignty and a few other things. Nothing in the world of geopolitics is simple! Angelina is much more than just an actress, I don’t think a lot of people realize just how much of our media is focused on these inconsequential people. Their actions and opinions are given undue attention and influence a lot of public opinion, right or wrong. The CIA and other government entities are very aware of this and use it to their advantage. These celebrities are famous all over the world, not just in the US, and that carries a lot of weight. And you (and most people) would probably be very surprised if you knew what went on in our nation’s capitol. I wouldn’t believe it myself if I hadn’t been born and raised there and wasn’t a lifelong political fanatic/junkie! But what they show the public is only the very tip of the iceberg, believe me.

I agree with you 100% about reducing carbon footprints and energy dependence! The petrodollar’s reign is about done and the more we adapt to a sustainable, reasonable model of consumption, the easier it will be for us to weather that storm. But of course when I speak about these things I am labeled a nutcase and a conspiracy theorist, so I sadly doubt things will go smoothly for most.

Sal, I don’t think anyone is belittling Angelina or her work. I want to believe she is doing this with the best of intentions but my experience and knowledge of these things makes it very hard. The UN is a very evil and criminal organization and I am wary of anyone who gets involved with them. Nothing at ALL personal against Angelina, if any other celeb does it I give them the side eye as well. That’s all I’m saying. I urge you to do some research and read more into the UN and government, etc. The one thing I can say with 100% absolute certainty is that there’s ALWAYS more to this than meets the eye.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sugar

Sugar — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:32:39 +0000

4:)

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Sal

Sal — Sun, 09 Dec 2012 02:55:11 +0000

I think the mistake you and others make is to see her as an actor first and foremost and to have the inability to see beyond that. These days, she a humanitarian. Thats it. First and foremost. Her acting has taken a backseat to her humanitarian work. She has been slowing down on her acting work and ramping up her humanitarian work. Unfortunately, people attack celebs for doing anything out of the box that they deem they should be doing. It is blatantly dishonest to belittle her earnest job with the UN. It is wrong to deliberately belittle her humanitarian work and say all she is, is an actor, because her humanitarian work is uncomfortable to you. It clearly makes some people very uncomfortable whenever an actor does serious humanitarian work, especially when they get in as deep as Angelina is. You need to accept that she is not just another celeb throwing a cheque. She is clearly much much more dedicated than that. Her protion to Special envoy proves she is far more dedicated to it than other celebs. A distinguishment needs to be made and acknowledged. She has become a humanitarian first and foremost, who just happens to occasionally do some acting. People need to acknowledge that fact. No matter how much they don’t want to.

Report this comment as spam or abuse