Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jan 19
'07
Sin City 2 rumors have Rachel Weisz or Rose McGowan replacing Angelina



next image >>

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Angelina Jolie, Movies, Photos, Rachel Weisz

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

11 Responses to “Sin City 2 rumors have Rachel Weisz or Rose McGowan replacing Angelina”

  1. Its being reported by several web sites that Rose McGowan is not in Sin City 2.

    Thank god for that, the majority of fans are happy that Rachel Weisz is getting the role.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. She is a coke addict, they won’t take this risk!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. “most movie sites favoring Rose McGowan”

    Excuse me but the majority of the sites i have been on are saying the opposite. Some of them are even saying that Rachel might be an even better choice for the role than Angelina.

    I don’t know where you are getting your information but it’s wrong.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. I was speaking about MC Ghostwan, not Angelina or Rachel.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. Pick Rachel, for the love of God, pick Rachel Weisz!!

    McGowan’s already in Grindhouse, and I’m sorry but if I was asked which dame I’d kill for I know what my answer would be.

    Definitely NOT Rose McGowan.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. Wow does Rose look bad! I wish these women wouldn’t think that bad plastic surgery will revive their careers. She kind of looks like Terri Hatcher in these close ups.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. I’m going to try not to geek out too hard here, but the character of Ava in “A Dame to Kill For” is just that: a totally irresistible woman in every sense of the word. And Rachel would be my choice out of the three. However, if they are going to stay as faithful to the original book as possible, the Ava role does require a bit of nudity (although, so did Jessica Alba’s character from the first one, Nancy, but she refused to do it), and I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Rachel Weisz doesn’t want to do any more nudity. Ahem, I, uh, think that’s it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. I wouldn’t pick either one of them. They don’t come to mind as being one of the actresses who can pull off an action role. Angelina can do that, but they probably aren’t going to wait for her and want to film now. That’s why people don’t go to see movies anymore, they aren’t cast right.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. what the hell did she do to her face? looks like she gave herself an eye lift with a butterknife and scotch tape…

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. Rachel is a much better actress than Angelina, so she would be much better in the role.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • Diva: Can someone show me where she was “thinking so highly of herself”? I’ve never seen it,...
  • whatevs: That sucks. I had colic as a baby and I drove my mother completely insane, I’m so scared I’ll...
  • melanie: i think it’s a bit judgemental to make such a blanket statement about women with no female friends....
  • daisy424: She looks better, cute routine.
  • Lola: I love 30 rock more than my name is earl and whatever the other show. I feel for Alec. He was a dimwit that day...
  • Diva: Didja guys bother to read the article? Just curious, cos it’s generally a good thing to do before making...
  • Jeanne: Now there’s a man! My distate for hats doesn’t apply to him. Depp has got style.
  • Jeanne: I’ve always failed to see the attraction of John Mayer. I guess if you dig that registered felon look....
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site owner. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. The site makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. The site owner and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site owner or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. The site owner is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. The site owner will not be held liable for comments in any way.