Stylish Celebrity Escapism
Contributing Writers
Jan 19
'07
Sin City 2 rumors have Rachel Weisz or Rose McGowan replacing Angelina



<< last image     next image >>

Written by Celebitchy

Posted in Angelina Jolie, Movies, Photos, Rachel Weisz

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

11 Responses to “Sin City 2 rumors have Rachel Weisz or Rose McGowan replacing Angelina”

  1. Its being reported by several web sites that Rose McGowan is not in Sin City 2.

    Thank god for that, the majority of fans are happy that Rachel Weisz is getting the role.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  2. She is a coke addict, they won’t take this risk!!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  3. “most movie sites favoring Rose McGowan”

    Excuse me but the majority of the sites i have been on are saying the opposite. Some of them are even saying that Rachel might be an even better choice for the role than Angelina.

    I don’t know where you are getting your information but it’s wrong.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  4. I was speaking about MC Ghostwan, not Angelina or Rachel.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  5. Pick Rachel, for the love of God, pick Rachel Weisz!!

    McGowan’s already in Grindhouse, and I’m sorry but if I was asked which dame I’d kill for I know what my answer would be.

    Definitely NOT Rose McGowan.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  6. Wow does Rose look bad! I wish these women wouldn’t think that bad plastic surgery will revive their careers. She kind of looks like Terri Hatcher in these close ups.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  7. I’m going to try not to geek out too hard here, but the character of Ava in “A Dame to Kill For” is just that: a totally irresistible woman in every sense of the word. And Rachel would be my choice out of the three. However, if they are going to stay as faithful to the original book as possible, the Ava role does require a bit of nudity (although, so did Jessica Alba’s character from the first one, Nancy, but she refused to do it), and I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Rachel Weisz doesn’t want to do any more nudity. Ahem, I, uh, think that’s it.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  8. I wouldn’t pick either one of them. They don’t come to mind as being one of the actresses who can pull off an action role. Angelina can do that, but they probably aren’t going to wait for her and want to film now. That’s why people don’t go to see movies anymore, they aren’t cast right.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  9. what the hell did she do to her face? looks like she gave herself an eye lift with a butterknife and scotch tape…

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

  10. Rachel is a much better actress than Angelina, so she would be much better in the role.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

Recent Comments:
  • shazzy: it doesnt matter what she did, it looks good. i would definitely have a few things done myself if i had the...
  • boobaloob: Mark Ronson’s hair is HORRIBLE. It’s too bad, because otherwise he’s a hottie.
  • Kimberly: I wanna know how she dated Jensen hot as hell Ackles and kept her virginity. wth is wrong with her?
  • Turbo Booster: Ron Wood needs Jesus to come into his life. He looks like “hell” but I hope he...
  • SolitaryAngel: AMEN to all of you who are more intimately acquainted with a nervous breakdown, as I am. With a REAL...
  • Alecto: Why do women insist on wearing concealer around their eyes that is pale white? She’s got a tan. It...
  • Vern: Oh Rio! I’m the same with racing past the perfume counters. It can be bad anywhere in public, I have...
  • DLR: I agree with Jen (the other one), Feebee, and Tia. Gabriel is well, okay, nothing to get my knickers in a twizzy...
 
 

Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip site written by several independent authors. The opinions of the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Celebitchy, LLC. All information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. Articles are based on rumor, conjecture, and published information in other sources. Celebitchy, LLC makes no claims that content is valid, accurate, or true. Celebitchy, LLC and the authors contributing to it will not be held liable for damages resulting from errors, omissions or falsehoods published on this site. It is not the site or the contributing authors' intention to defame or malign any particular group, religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual. Celebitchy, LLC is not responsible for content on linked or quoted sources. All comments made by visitors to the blog are the responsibility of their respective authors and are only sporadically monitored. Celebitchy, LLC will not be held liable for comments in any way.