Jennifer Lawrence in a fug fur at the Chateau Marmont: is she the next Lohan?

Agent Bedhead is the resident Jennifer Lawrence-loonie. Actually, I’m not even sure if Bedhead is really a J-Law fan, or if she just like to cover Jennifer Lawrence because J-Law is so quotable and interesting. I realize that many of you are “over” Jennifer, much as you’re “over” Anne Hathaway – it’s a combination of overexposure and hyper-self-awareness and that particular kind of aw-shucks-I’m-so-normal-ing. It does grate on my nerves a little bit, but I’m still a fan of Jennifer, and of Anne too.

So perhaps that’s why I was so forgiving of these photos from the weekend. Late, late Saturday night/Sunday morning, Jennifer Lawrence and a girlfriend came stumbling (?) out of the Chateau Marmont, and these are the photos. First of all, let’s just discuss the idea of Jennifer Lawrence at the Marmont: does this make her a crackhead? I say no. The Marmont is a favorite spot for crackies like Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Bynes, of course, but it’s also a standard place for Young Hollywood in general, and industry events are still held there. So while I would hope that Jennifer would be “too good” for the Marmont… maybe it was business? She’s doing the Oscar campaign thing this year, so it’s good to be seen, out and about.

However… this look is not good. It’s one thing to hang out in a place where crackheads go to get crackie. It’s quite another to leave the Marmont looking like the second coming of Lindsay Lohan. The fur jacket is Theory, and the black dress is simply… unfortunate. She doesn’t look drunk or high or anything, but she doesn’t really look “together” either. And what’s with the Kristen Stewart-esque shoes? UGH.

So, should we put Jennifer on notice? Or do we give her the opportunity to redeem herself and her style at the Critics Choice and the Globes?

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News.

 

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

101 Responses to “Jennifer Lawrence in a fug fur at the Chateau Marmont: is she the next Lohan?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Faye says:

    Oh dear. Is it my imagination, or is she also wearing the tragic, Lohan-esque extensions? Say it ain’t so, Jennifer!

    I’ll give this incident a pass, but only if it’s a one-off :( .

  2. Skipper says:

    Give it a week and she’ll be smashing cars and being paid to attend private parties. I go to Walmart in my pajamas sometimes but that doesn’t mean I’m going to start taking meth.

  3. some bitch says:

    Ohh dear. I sure hope not. I really like Jennifer.

  4. Brown says:

    This is really a tragic look for her. However, I saw Silver Linings Playbook on Sunday and it was amazing, so I’m giving her a pass.

    SerialKillerEyes Bradley Cooper was amazing, by the way. Seriously…. his performance was impressive. I thought Jennifer did a good job too, but Bradley hit it out of the park.

  5. carrie says:

    she has no fashion sense!

    she yet won the worst look of the year :it’s ugly ugly ugly (the hair,the hair color ,the color,the make-up,the shoes,the outfits,THE COAT!!)

    Lindsay Lohan out of JLaw’s body!!

  6. carrie says:

    http://tinyurl.com/aw2t5ar yet before in an official event,her look was fugly

  7. serena says:

    Sigh.. I’m not really a fan but this is the worst, I think, she ever looked.
    The unkept, dirty, hair is what is trubling me the most..girl, go to a damn parlour. Even her make up is awful, like she slept with it..and the clothes.. Yeah, this is a full ‘Lohan-esque’ look. She even seems a bit high or off..

  8. apsutter says:

    I hope she doesnt get carried away with the hollywood lifestyle. I don’t think she’ll be the next Blohan because if you ever read Jen’s interviews she is much more self aware and down to earth than Lindsay. Lindsay was always self important and talking about winning Oscars and shit even when she was a teenager. I have high hopes for Jen.

  9. andrea says:

    I think it’s a few years of movie flops, a severe addiction, and a couple of manslaughter cases too early to be comparing her to Lohan. The girl goes to Marmont and has a few drinks, and suddenly she’s Lohan 2.0? Please. That outfit really is tragic though.

  10. Dree says:

    There are some things one cannot unsee. The Lohan similarity is too much. Please let this be some elaborate joke, or my girlcrush/Oscar hopefuls list might have to be reevaluated.

    • carrie says:

      i only compare their looks (i never said Lawrence was drugged)because when i saw the pics yesterday i thought she was Lohan

      NB: every Hollywood actor/actress (under 35) goes to Chateau Marmont: Emma Stone,Garfield,Gosling,Brolin,Penn, Diaz,Segel,Williams…

  11. lisa2 says:

    I like Jennifer. She just doesn’t look good here at all. Not sure what is going on with the hair and outfit. But not her best look to date.

    • elceibeno08 says:

      I am with you on this one. It is baffling to me why these actresses who have MILLIONS of dollars at their disposal make these fashion mistakes. I go to clothing stores and they have lots of beautiful outfits for young girls like Jennifer. So why she choses to dress like a witch is beyond me.

      • Chordy says:

        I have a feeling that if I had unlimited access to all the clothes ever, everyone would make this exact comment about me. For some reason, when I’m getting dressed, I get overly excited or something and end up with some tragic combinations whose tragedy I only notice once I see the photos. The only thing keeping me from looking like Willy Wonka on a daily basis is that I can only afford “staple” pieces. You should see my epic collection of scarves though.

  12. Jess says:

    She gets a complete pass in my book.

    In fact, I don’t think it even fair to Jennifer to insinuate that there are any comparisons between Jennifer and Lohan.

    Lawrence is actually amazingly talented, and has a long, bright career ahead of her. She is the anti-Blohan.

    I believe she was out with some girlfriends at the Marmont, so not business. However, just because Linsanity frequents the Marmont, do we condemn every star who goes there?

  13. Mia 4S says:

    Oh the outfit is bad but whatever. To mention Lohan in the same breath at this point is sacrilege! Look even Sandra Bullock has been known to hang out at the Marmont. A lot of power players do because of the privacy offered. It’s not the Marmont that’s the problem, it’s what you make of it.

  14. Nikollet says:

    I think the dodgy makeup also looks Lohan-esque, but I’d give her a pass – this time only though…

  15. elceibeno08 says:

    Whatever she did to her hair is not appealing to the eye. The throw on my sofa looks better than that ugly two-tone fur coat. Her dress looks like she got it a witch’s yard sale. So I agree, her overall look is very weird and old to say the least. By the way, why does Keiser call everyone who uses drugs a crackie? Amanda Bynes uses pot so she is not a crackie she is a pothead. Crackie should be reserved por crack users shouldn’ it?

  16. strah says:

    My question is, did this evening involve dancing? She looks to me like a young lady who had a lot of fun drinking and dancing, whose makeup melted off, who changed into more comfortable shoes, and whose hair got all sweaty and limp. I’ve stumbled out of many a club looking like a much less pretty version of how I went in just because I was drinking, dancing, and having fun.

    I would give her the benefit of the doubt until she does something much more awful than not looking perfect coming out of a club.

  17. marie says:

    she looks awful, the shoes are very geriatric looking, but she is nothing like Lohan.

  18. La Calabaza says:

    Jennifer Lawrence is a gifted actress but she cannot dress to save her life.

    She cannot be compared her to Ms Blohan. First she doesn’t even look drunk. She might had had a few drinks but she is not pulling a Kate Moss. Second she went out, she had fun and she is NOT driving.

    Give her a break for God’s sake!

    • elceibeno08 says:

      I think Keiser’s is trying to imply that Chauteau Marmont is not a good place for actors to hang out at. That place has a reputation because people go there to get wasted. Jennifer does have a ‘worried’ look in her face though, like someone just gave her bad news over the cell phone.

      • Jess says:

        The Marmont is a stalking ground of Lindsay Lohan – but that does not automatically equate it to a known place for starts to get wasted. In fact, the Marmont is as famous as it is because it is well known as a place for industry business to take place.

        And I disagree about her “worried” look – not that any of us would know, as we aren’t Jennifer – but I would assume she was just attempting to have a conversation on her phone with the full-on flashes of paparazzo cameras in her face. That is all.

      • Kate (newer one) says:

        A couple of people on ONTD (they hate her there, so it wasn’t to flatter her) can lipread, and they said she was soothing a friend who sounded like they’d been dumped. There’s a video of the thing.

    • Elceibeno08 says:

      This is a reply to Jess: any comments about her outfit? Don’t you think she is too young and pretty to wear those awful garments of hers.

      • MisJes says:

        I think she does look frumpy in this outfit IMO. The coat and the flats are just meh, and the look seems jumbled together. I would have loved to have seen the dress underneath without the fur coat and a cute pair of heels!

        IMO, her hair and make up are also meh. I think she’s got a little too much on, and her hair needed to be styled, it looks unkempt here,

  19. Ranunculus says:

    I find her pretty overrated – talent and look wise.

  20. Boo says:

    The shoes offend me on every level.

    I like JLaw, but this is a really bad look. Is she aware that they sell powder in a little thing called a compact that you can put in your purse to cut down on the late-night Marmont oilies? Gah. And why does she always have Worried Eyebrows?

  21. Michele says:

    It’s not fair to compare Jennifer to Lohan. Jennifer does not have a drug problem and she takes her acting career very seriously. However, she has no fashion sense to speak of and always looks uncomfortable when she dresses up. That’s not a crime for a young woman her age who, like Kristen Stewart, admits she grew up a tomboy surrounded by older brothers. With time, she’ll find her fashion footing. That furry beast of a jacket is the ugliest thing I have ever seen, though.

    At least she had the sense to take a cab home after a night of boozing. Well done, Jennifer.

  22. The Original Mia says:

    Jennifer was out partying with her friends. She doesn’t look drunk or high. She looks sweaty. She gets a pass from me.

  23. mia girl says:

    Worst jacket/coat ever and the main culprit in our reaction to these photos.

    Burn it Jennifer, burn it to H*ll!

  24. EmmaStoneWannabe says:

    Yeah I agree with all on here to say it’s an unfair comparison. Wow she goes out for drinks with friends and looks a little rough, and not even driving…big deal. Im actually pretty impressed it’s taken her this long in her career to have going out pics..she was nominated for an Oscar 2 years ago, so she has obv been on the scene for a while and this is the first time we see her going out looking rough…gets a pass from me.

  25. A says:

    I have a like or dislike reaction to JenLaw, but I have to say this headline is over-the-top. That said, I find it highly ironic that a couple of days after saying she sat home on couch and never partied, she was photographed in a Lohan-esque outfit stumbling drunk out of the Chateau with friends. I doubt it will ever happen again. As Lainey said, she’s the best actress of her age group (I happen to find her 2nd to Saorise, jmo) and she plays the game so much better than the others too.

  26. kingkayski says:

    In fairness of Lindsay Lohan,once a upon a time a long long long time ago,the girl can act circles around these actress now a days,plus she’s got looks,along long time ago,but due to her stupidity and having a crackie parents,she now became Blohan.But this got to be the most atrocious outfit i’ve ever seen an oscar hopeful ever wear,that’s all i got to say.

  27. Lulu says:

    She looks orange. That and the fur coat are freaking me out.

  28. yael says:

    the girl looks sweaty and like she had a few drinks. don’t fault her for having a good time and having bad taste in clothes.

  29. FirstTimer says:

    Yes, Jen. I forgive you. :)

  30. Sal says:

    Wasn’t there a blind a few moths back about her and a LOT of cocaine?

  31. Sal says:

    Wasn’t there a blind a few months back about her and a LOT of cocaine?

  32. Nessa says:

    I mean, she does not look good here. However, to compare her to one of the most despicable people in Hollywood is way too much. Girlfriend needs to hire a new stylist ASAP. But she will be just fine.

  33. Princess Hot Ginge says:

    I wouldn’t go so far as to call her the “next Lohan”. She’s what, 22? Who doesn’t make embarrassing fashion faux pas in their early 20′s. I just thank G-d that facebook and twitter weren’t around when I was that age.

  34. Moore says:

    There is no reason to hate on the Marmont just because LL stays there. Doesn’t seem fair to the hotel.

  35. Gia says:

    If you want to now how she’s going to turn out, take a look at her parents. We all turn into our parents (well, not all but most).

  36. Rachel says:

    I liked her up until I saw these photos. Now I want to punch her for wearing fur. The issue of extreme animal cruelty aside, it also makes me wonder if she’s only pretending to be relatable. I just can’t imagine any real down-to-earth person wearing fur. After all, you have to be a little cruel and delusional to think you have the right to wear something that is the result of many poor animals losing their lives in some of the most disgusting ways (they’re usually skinned alive and left to die in a pile).

  37. Louise says:

    Why does everyone keep saying she’s blonde? It’s clear as day she’s a ginge! On the Daily Mail site they have a tonne of pics of her with the most ginger roots and eyebrows ever and people are still calling her blonde! wtf!? Even the headline describes her hair as tiger stripes which should be a clue lol!

  38. Ron says:

    Chateau Marmont has been a hip Hollywood hang out since the 70′s. It;s amazing it still is since nothing in LA lasts longer than 3 years it seems. Everyone and I mean EVERYONE goes there at some point or another. Comparing her to Lohan because they went to the same place is a bit simple.

  39. Chickenlishus says:

    Sorry, but you have to be flat-out goofy or high to wear that mess, unless you are playing dress up with grandma’s unfortunate coat from the 50s for a theme party.

  40. midnightmoon says:

    If I was in the middle of Oscar season I’d be way more careful. This is just an awful look, bad choices all around, and that makes people wonder.

    Whatevs. We shall wait and see if she can carry her goodness through. This is a huge disappointment, though.

  41. Shelly says:

    Oh, please. She’s young and went out one night. Who cares. That outfit is hideous, though.

  42. Donny says:

    Kaiser! They all go to the Marmont even Fassy and whoever else you ship at the moment. Even jennifer anniston goes there with her ageing hipster boyfriend. Emily Blunt and John Krakinski is there a lot. This isnt enough for someone to be compared to Lohan normally, so why Jennifer who is out there making movies back to back? Too harsh in my opinion, get off her back she hasnt really shown any lohanesque form at all yet! I concur that the outfit is hideous though.

  43. Cilla says:

    Terrible outfit but please with the lohan comparison.
    If your thinking is that once a starlet goes to the chateau marmont they are the new lohan you’re gonna have to start calling every young actor in hollywood. Stone, garfield, pattison, stewart, gosling, wilde, cooper et all. Next time they are coming out of the chateau I expect you will call them the new lohan just simply for going to the same place. Eyeroll.

  44. Cilla says:

    Terrible outfit but please with the lohan comparison.
    If your thinking is that once a starlet goes to the chateau marmont they are the new lohan you’re gonna have to start calling every young actor in hollywood the next lohan, Stone, garfield, pattison, stewart, gosling, wilde, cooper et all. So next time they are coming out of the chateau I expect you will call them the new lohan just simply for going to the same place. Eyeroll.

  45. Kate (newer one) says:

    She dresses terribly here, but she dresses even worse in another set of photos taken the next day, over on the Mail. Vile blue velvet loafers and awful trousers, and in daylight her growing out her dye for the Hunger Games is really obvious and not great.

    Having said that, I still like her. I can’t see the Chateau as being at the heart of Lohan’s issues, really, not with those parents. I just think she is terrible at dressing herself – her stylist is a smart cookie.

  46. Crystal says:

    she’s never been a great dresser. i always hate how she looks on the red carpet. she has such a great body but no idea how to dress it.

  47. Oh please. Not every bad camping trip can become the Donner Party- it takes a lot of hard work to create a disaster that big.

    I think it’s a little silly to presume that a famous young celebrity is turning into the next tabloid train wreck over one irresponisble choice or in the case, wearing less then terrific clothes.

  48. Jub-Jub says:

    I find it strange and disheartening that people here are more offended that she was compared to Lohan than the fact that she is wearing real fox and rabbit fur. What a disgusting woman.

    • Amy says:

      Exactly! I know that this is a gossip website but it’s still a bit sad that people are THAT superficial and no one really cares about animals unless it’s cute dogs or cats or whatever..

    • Kate (newer one) says:

      How can you be sure it’s real? Genuinely interested.

      I also don’t really get why fur is seen as so much worse than leather or meat, if it’s humanely produced. I mean, I worry about shoes a lot because they have no kind of welfare traceability in the way meat does. But I don’t see why fur is seen as worse than leather, really? Is that just my ignorance?

      EDIT: just read up that animals for fur are skinned alive – if so, wow. How is the trade in fur even legal?

      I hope she’s wearing fake, that’s all I can say.

      • Jub-Jub says:

        Hi Kate, the fur is 100% real rabbit and fox fur, I checked on the label’s site. I don’t wear leather either because the leather industry is just as abhorrent as the fur industry. I have no idea why the leather industry isn’t as publicly scrutinized as the fur industry – in my opinion it should be. I think it may have something to do with the fact that takes quite a few rabbits, mink, sable etc. to make one outfit.

        I’m also dumbfounded as to why these barbaric practices are legal as well. In China (where a lot of famous labels get their fur from) it is common to use dog and cats (stolen from families) as well.

        http://pinterest.com/dohoca/furs-are-worn-by-beautiful-animals-and-ugly-people/

        Just a warning, the above link is very graphic (pictures) I just posted it in case someone wants to know a bit more about the industry.

      • A says:

        @Jub Jub.
        Ditto on the reason the fur industry is more widely reviled than leather is because of the amount of dead animals it takes to create a fur coat, etc. Doesn’t it take something like 75-100! dead mink to create one coat? I do disagree a little on the leather vs. fur debate…the leather industry is horrific, but I do feel that the fur industry is even more horrific and barbaric. They tend to skin animals alive and anally electrocute to get fur, for example…So I understand why animal rights activists tend to focus more on fur than leather.

        My friend is a real animal activist and thinks another reason leather is more accepted is because it has culturally been used for various purposes and to a wide extent in American life, versus the early fur trade. For example, leather ropes, leather reins for horses, saddles, men’s work boots, etc….then you have the fashion. Fur, mainly, has been used for fashion and to keep warm…while you can also keep warm with a wool coat. Basically, that Americans don’t always equate leather with fashion as they do with functionality, and on the other hand people don’t equate fur as being functional and more as a fashion statement. Some designers are starting use faux leather though, which is cool…although not many. I’m surprised by how many designers still use fur.

    • A says:

      Agree. I didn’t even realize it was real fur until a style blog I read pointed that out…I’m used to seeing celebrities wear faux. I should have read the original post Kaiser wrote more closely, as she said it was a Theory fur, and not faux, jacket. Gross. Fur is far more offensive than comparing someone to Lohan.

      • Jub-Jub says:

        Not sure if you’ll see this comment since I’m late (no internet today at work) but A, everything you wrote was so true, especially on your comments on leather, it is so ingrained in our culture. I’m Australian and we have leather everywhere too. It’s hard to avoid sometimes.

  49. Val5 says:

    This not look like real fur at all. The fox fur doesn’t shine like this.

    • A says:

      It’s real :( . As Jub Jub pointed out, it’s on the Theory website…the fashion blog I read linked to it (rabbit and blue fox…hence the unusual look). She’s lucky that most people/some bloggers will assume it’s fake (I did originally). Seriously, out of all the starlets (although I do realize everybody fucks up) Emma Stone is the only one who doesn’t do stupid shit…even Emma Watson did an obvs. panty flash once.

  50. Legopolis says:

    ummm she looks high AND drunk

  51. Lisa says:

    Disgusting and ignorant for wearing ugly painted fox fur. And without proper lightning and photoshop looks very plain. Never liked her as an actress and she obviously has no empathy for animals who suffered a horrible death for that ugly fur coat.