Comments on: Heather Mills-Gold Digging 101

By: estelitom

estelitom — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:40:19 +0000

She doesn’t have to deny that she’s a fucking gold digger. “GOLD DIGGER” will now be her official name from now on. So let’s start referring to he as The GOLD DIGGER from now on. GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!
GOLD DIGGER!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: methinks

methinks — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:45:11 +0000

30% of his fortune?? my ass … apparently she doesnt deserve a percent of it considering Paul accumulated his wealth way b4 he met this bimbo…..

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kailie2

kailie2 — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:57:01 +0000

I’d agree that she’d be entitled to a bigger chunk of his fortune if they were married for 20 years but their marriage was short (though she was clever enough to produce a child). I don’t know the UK laws on this but many US states go by the length of marriage as the No. 1 factor in determining who gets what. Of course there is always a fight if one side was rich to begin with, but the basic principle is: you were not there when he (or she) earned it, forget about getting 50%. Most people get a chunk of what the other spouse made during the marriage and some protection for the child, house or two, trust fund, education etc., if the ex is rich. Heather is overreaching but she could just wear him out and maybe that’s what’s she’s counting on. I’d say $10 million should be enough for her. Greedy bitch.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: neelyo

neelyo — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:06:24 +0000

I agree with Cici, the law is an ass. She didn’t do anything to earn his money and yet she has rights to it?!? Pre-nup or not, that’s bullshit. There was a horrible special on VH1 (what other kind are there?), one of those ‘Fabulous Life’ things, where they featured celebrity divorces and it was disgusting. Spouses who become accustomed to a certain lifestyle believe that they are entitled to that way of living even if the only reason they had it is because they were married to the right person, NOT because they had brought anything to the table themselves. Truly despicable.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jenna

Jenna — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:30:34 +0000

Didn’t they have a prenup?

The only person Heather is hurting is Heather, since nobody believes the false stories she puts out. This kind of behavior doesn’t look good in front of a judge either.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: cici

cici — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:39:10 +0000

Actually, legally, she does deserve it. The moral of the story: sign a pre-nup. Paul is the idiot.

You might think she is a golddigger, but the law is the law, and the law is an ass.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Pecarrie

Pecarrie — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:24:19 +0000

Also, cant she rely on her ole’ acting skills to make enough for herself?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Pecarrie

Pecarrie — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:21:46 +0000

OMG she has no right to that! Just for being next to him for a short while, it doesnt mean she deserves his money HE EARNED it, not her. He can give her ’sympathy settlement’, you know, enough to get back on her own two —-err, one– feet and then take care of HERSELF again. I think thats the only fair route.

Report this comment as spam or abuse