'13
After spending the week dismissing Angelina Jolie as a “demon” and Taylor Swift as virgin who got dumped all the time because she wouldn’t put out, Chelsea Handler returned to her great love, obsessively tending to her Team Aniston status. Chelsea appeared on Katie Couric’s talk show and of course the conversation came around to Jennifer Aniston and all of that:
Even Jennifer Aniston’s closest friends are being kept in the dark about her upcoming wedding plans.
“I know she’s engaged but that’s all I know,” Chelsea Handler told talk show host Katie Couric. “I’m sure I’ll find out about it when it’s about to happen … for privacy issues.”
Handler co-hosts Friday’s episode of Couric’s syndicated talk show Katie but had very little to share about her pal Aniston’s pending nuptials to Justin Theroux.
“I honestly don’t know anything about it,” Handler said. “She doesn’t consult me on her plans.”
The Chelsea Lately host also implied she has not been asked to be a bridesmaid (or a flower girl) by Aniston, who announced her engagement to Theroux last fall.
“Would you ask me to be a flower girl? I mean seriously,” she told Couric, who answered politely, “I’m not getting married but I would ask you to be a bridesmaid.”
“Bridesmaids are tricky,” Handler continued. “If I got married I wouldn’t even have a bridesmaid. [My talk show sidekick Chuy Bravo] would be my flower girl – or no, ring bearer. See! I don’t even know what happens at weddings.”
There is one thing Handler can confirm about Aniston’s engagement to Theroux: “She’s happy, of course,” Handler said. “He’s a great guy.”
Yes, Chelsea is sure she’ll be invited to Jennifer’s wedding. The invitation will probably be Chelsea’s “reward” for her years of publicly slamming Angelina Jolie. But of course Chelsea can’t be controlled by Jennifer! Jennifer could never tell Chelsea to STFU about Angelina. Never! It’s not like Chelsea gets “rewarded” for being Jennifer’s attack dog (and I mean that in every sense) over and over and over again. It’s not like it looks like Jennifer still spends all of her Goddess Circle time with Chelsea bitching about Angelina Jolie in between shoots of vodka even now.
Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
Written by Kaiser
Posted in Chelsea Handler, Jennifer Aniston
- Who butchered the National Anthem? [D-Listed]
- Rob Lowe never ages [Lainey Gossip]
- What is Vanessa Hudgens wearing? [Go Fug Yourself]
- Summer guide to reality TV [Reality Tea]
- Game of Thrones recap [Pajiba]
- Tan Mom’s music video [Buzzfeed]
- Amanda Knox is broke [Starcasm]
- Backstage at the Billboard Awards [Popsugar]
- Miley is still stuck in the 90s [Popoholic]
- Blind Items revealed: Adam Levine [CDAN]
- Hugh Hefner bought Crystal Harris a house [Celebslam]
- What happened to Aimee Teegarden? [The Blemish]
These two both need to go join Anne Hathaway in the quiet corner now, because it has reached the saturation point with “news” about Jen’s wedding, and what Chelsea thinks about it and her. We.don’t.care.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
+1
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Help me out, folks-
Can anyone name one redeeming quality of this woman? I am unable to conceive of even one, even professionally speaking.
What a waste of air.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Chelsea sets up a college fund for the children of her staff on her show(s). They give birth and she puts in… I forgot the exact amount… 25,000? 30k? Anyways, she does this and it’s terribly sweet, but that’s all I can think of.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She can be quite funny, and I read somewhere taht she is really nice to her co-workers.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
My views are kind of biased since I can not stand (the unfunny comedienne) Chelsea Handler. For me, Handler’s talk-show is unwatchable and a waste of air time. I wish she would go away. Just one question: why is Handler obsessed with Angelia Jolie? Her continuing anti-Jolie rants are pathetic and plain mean.
@faye I agree with you that we don’t care anymore.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
This
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Hw is aniston responsible for the bitchy things that comes out of chelsea’s mouth??? Chelsea is mean abt most ppl, she has said shit about very many people, she used to shit talk all of the three in d triangle for years, yes even aniston.. Obviously she met aniston and likely changed her view on her(maybe the same would happen if she met jolie)
Wht I don’t get is some ppl trying to act like chelsea shit talking jolie Is a new thing that only started after her friendship with aniston… No! Its been there long, the only shit is she stopped shit talking one person in d triangle is now friends with(like do ppl still expect her to mock her friend lol???
There might be a surprise, maybe one day she will meet jolie and see she aint too bad and change her tune…most ppl always hv a different impression after they personal meet a person.
Anyway chelsea is allowed to dislike who she wants, she openly shit talks abt a lot of celebs, the only reason ppl place huge attention on this is cos although she been shit talking abut the jolie for years, now she is frnd with aniston some want to paint her bitchy shit talks on that triangle nonesense..
I doubt chelsea tells aniston who to like and not like or how to do her job, so aniston can’t really tell chelsea hw to do her’s either…
Report this comment as spam or abuse
It seems obsessive because it’s the same old schtick every time. Chelsea thinks Angelina is a home-wrecker. We get that. But Angelina has been with Brad for many years now and they have 6 kids together. She mostly stays out of the news. Calling her a ho and not a girl’s girl is no longer a hot issue or one that makes sense – seems like she’s trying to keep this thing alive for Jennifer’s sake.
If Chelsea were a real comedian, and wanted to be snarky about women who have affairs with taken men, she would take Jennifer Aniston and Laura Dern to task for their home-wrecking. And of course she would have to slap herself too.
So to me, this smacks of a bunch of insecure girls getting together to talk trash about the women who intimidate them. It’s sad.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Heyu, who wrote: “Wht I don’t get is some ppl trying to act like chelsea shit talking jolie Is a new thing that only started after her friendship with aniston… No! Its been there long …”
Even Whoopi Goldberg called Chelsea Handler out about her sudden ‘Home-wrecker, Angie is a C&nt’ rants on “The View” … and “The View” is no friend of either Angie or Brad. When Elisabeth Hasselbeck and Sherri Shepherd went all “She’s just watching her girl’s back” and “I don’t see anything wrong with what she’s saying” Whoopi Goldberg gave them the hand and said it just seems suspicious to her that Handler would start this crap after 7 years (this show was after Chelsea’s rant about Angie last fall … Whoopi played a bit of Handler’s ‘Angie rant’ for the audience). Whoopi said if Chelsea was that upset about her ‘friend’ Jennifer Aniston why is she just now coming out as harsh as she is about Angie, why didn’t she say anything closer to the time it actually happened?
Then Whoopi (who I think is one of the coolest people on the planet) went on to say that no body knows what really happened in that (the Brad and Angie) situation. Sherry and Elisabeth started squawking again, so Whoopi confessed that ‘she’ has been ‘the other woman’ before, but she wouldn’t get involved with the men until and if ‘they’ made the decision to leave their current relationship.
Whoopi went on to say that she didn’t understand why people always insist that it’s the woman who pursues the man in those situations. She said she was always the one pursued in her ‘other woman’ scenarios.
*You can probably find this segment of “The View” at YouTube.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Yes, Whoopi is just the best. I mean she defended Angelina! Oh and she also defended Roman Polanski and Micheal Vick too. A real class act.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Lauren, who wrote: “Yes, Whoopi is just the best. I mean she defended Angelina! Oh and she also defended Roman Polanski and Micheal Vick too. A real class act.”
No matter how you feel about her personal views, Whoopi Goldberg is one of the most talented comedians alive today. Her point about Chelsea Handler’s attack against Angelina Jolie disguised as a ‘comedy’ routine was that it seemed more ‘nasty’ then ‘funny,’ which is why I posted her comments.
‘My’ comment about Whoopi being one of the coolest people on the planet wasn’t because she defended Angelina Jolie, it was because of her honesty about her personal choices and moral code in her relationships, which I admire.
I also defend Michael Vick. The man paid his dues to Society. In the United States of America, once you’ve paid your dues to Society (admitted your crime against society, accepted your punishment, served time, performed community service) you’re supposed to be able to once again live and prosper in society. If you’re an American citizen, didn’t they teach you that in Civics class? And if you’re ‘not’ an American citizen, I’m glad I could provide a Civics lesson for you.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She said she was always the one pursued in her ‘other woman’ scenarios.
And how exactly does that absolve her of any responsibility? She admits she knew her lovers were married.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
LOL at your condescending “civics lesson”.
“In the United States of America, once you’ve paid your dues to Society (admitted your crime against society, accepted your punishment, served time, performed community service) you’re supposed to be able to once again live and prosper in society.”
Just testing your theory, and completely off-topic, but should pedophiles and murderers be welcomed back onto society as well? Should we just forget their crimes entirely after they have paid for the crime in the eyes of the law? I think part of the punishment is the stigmata that follows them for the rest of their lives.
But maybe that’s because I’m not American. I find Whoopi a very opinionated woman, with very strong views on how other people live their live. But she seems to have a whole other set of rules that she herself gets to live by.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@KAI, who wrote: “And how exactly does that absolve her of any responsibility? She admits she knew her lovers were married.”
At what point did I say she got involved with these men while they were still in a committed relationship? She didn’t become ‘involved’ with them on any level while they were still in a relationship (she was very clear about that when Elisabeth gasped). If they wanted her, they ended their current relationship and pursued her, but she said she didn’t dictate that to them.
She basically said she told them, once they approached her, that she didn’t get involved with men who were already committed to someone else, then she stayed out of ‘it’ and away from them until ‘they’ made a decision about their relationship (she didn’t specify whether they were married or just in a long-term committed relationship). Some stayed with their S.O.’s, some left their relationship in order to pursue her. By the way she talked, it only seemed to have happened, one or two times.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Lauren, who wrote: “Just testing your theory, and completely off-topic, but should pedophiles and murderers be welcomed back onto society as well? Should we just forget their crimes entirely after they have paid for the crime in the eyes of the law? I think part of the punishment is the stigmata that follows them for the rest of their lives.”
First of all, I’m sorry if my comment seemed ‘condescending,’ I didn’t mean for it to.
I don’t know about the Justice system in your country or if you have a Constitution that guarantees certain rights to its citizens, I can only speak (and I have) of ‘my’ country and the body of laws governing its citizens.
Again @Lauren, who wrote: “But maybe that’s because I’m not American. I find Whoopi a very opinionated woman, with very strong views on how other people live their live. But she seems to have a whole other set of rules that she herself gets to live by.”
Whoopi didn’t say Chelsea Handler should not do her comedy routine full of hateful, nasty rants about Angelina Jolie and her children, she just thought the timing of the hateful, nasty rants was rather suspicious, considering the whole Angie-Brad-Jen thing happened in 2005.
And she gave the example of being the ‘other woman’ a man left his woman/wife for and how she personally handled the situation (by staying out of it and not pursuing the man) because Sherri Shepherd and Elisabeth Hasselbeck went on a ‘she broke up Jennifer’s marriage’ spree. She just reminded them that the woman isn’t always the one who ‘breaks up’ the marriage. Sometimes a man makes the decision to leave even when the ‘other’ woman stays away from him because he’s committed to someone else.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I like a fair amount of what Whoopi has to say about most things. What she said here seems intelligent. But unfortunately now every time I see her I also think of her saying that drugging and raping a 13 year old child is not ‘rape rape’ and her defense of Mel Gibson. I didn’t even know she defended Vick too.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
About the law I think that when someone has legally paid their dues they are free to go about their life but that doesn’t have any bearing on if the people of the world forgive him. Like his rights say he has paid his debt to society and is now free to go. But people know what he did and will continue to bring it up and hate on him for as long as he lives and that can’t be controlled by rights and laws.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Emma
Goldberg has admitted in the past to relationships with married men and also to cheating while she was married. She may be trying now to make herself look like she has some integrity but she certainly does not.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
@Moore–both posts …
Why do you keep bringing this to the World’s arena, especially Michael Vick?
Roman Polanski hasn’t been tried in a Court of Law for his crime, and he should be (although I keep asking myself … where were this girl’s parents???), especially as this isn’t the first charge leveled against him for the same act.
Michael Vick, however, ‘has’ been tried, sentenced, and has served his time. Anything else is over-kill, unless you want him dead. It may be hard for the World to understand this, but fair and equal justice means (or should mean) exactly that. And I feel you, but all the energy (not just yours) aimed at hating on Michael Vick could be better served channeled somewhere else.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Whatever, I love me some Whoopi. You don’t have to agree with her personal views to think she’s an intelligent woman. She’s honest.
@Lauren– Get off your ivory tower. Seriously. There are plenty of women who are on CB that have been “the other woman” and are ashamed for it but it happens.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
In response to your question: Yes, she is responsible also. They are self-proclaimed bff, if Aniston would tell her that she is uncomfortable with her always talking about that (what I guess would happen with any normal person years after a divorce), she would certainly stop. It only brings JA into a bad light, so it’s not really making her a favor.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
[NOTE: There exists ample evidence that Huvane/Aniston either read and/or are aware of what is written in these blogs and other prominet blog sites.]
What world do you live in where you can publicly attack someone very famous and adored by many across the globe, over the years and NOT receive backlash?
As of 2009, Chelsea’s comments regarding Angelina have not been jokes. There is no humor added to her inflammatory remarks. Furthermore, making racist comments about someone’s children (of which Chelsea is guilty), celebrity or not, is extremely low and hateful—NEVER FUNNY.
Defending Chelsea’s freedom of speech is a slippery slope. All over the internet many are speaking out against her Angie “jokes” which are repulsive. I find her ugly (inside and out), nasty, foolish, misguided, catty, jealous and untrustworthy –and this is the behavior that SHE CHOOSES to display while expressing her “freedom of speech.”
I encourage you to read the PREVIOUS POST about Chelsea that CB covered the other day, where many have provided a factual timeline of how and when Chelsea’s comments took a turn for the worse upon befriending Aniston. Mysteriously enough all Aniston digs stopped while Chelsea launched into viciously name-calling Angie, WITH Aniston’s passive approval.
Chelsea’s focus on her BFF’s nemesis is too obvious. She does not know Angelina, has never met her, and so her criticisms about Angelina are not based from knowledge.
Chelsea is nowhere near a girl’s girl. I would not trust this one with a secret. Furthermore, her choice in boyfriends and sport fish (aka bed partners) are just as keen as Laura Dern and Aniston— very poor.
Chelsea is appropriately marked for her nasty persona. If you are dizzy enough to present as a b*tch in public and diss on someone, and in her case REPEATEDLY, then she should graciously receive the opposing views, preferably in the arse.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Oh please! Chelsea was never as vicious or personal about Angelina until Chelsea signed on with CCA and with Huvane. Chelsea also made fan of Aniston but that stopped the moment she signed on with CCA and Huvane. Its been explained so many times. Its a fact that Aniston hired Handler as her attack dog, anyone can see that. Aniston has a moral responsibility to rein in her friend if she didn’t like it. She doesn’t, because Handler is Aniston and Huvane’s puppet. No one can argue with this its fact.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Oh, just sit down, Aniston’s mouthpiece.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
It’s about time for Katie Couric to start making better business decisions. Co-hosting with Chelsea Handler? Really? Kiss of death right there.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
One is a vapid, shallow, self obsessed attention addict, the other one is just a bitch.
I’ll let you decide which is which.
And, no, I am not a Brangelina fan.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
So true, so true.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Aniston and Handler = The bimbo and her bulldog.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I wonder if Courtney will be attending the small,private affair covered exclusively by People Magazine.Bridal shower sponsored by Aveeno just kidding
Report this comment as spam or abuse
true true
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Just look at that body language. These two chicks are SO lovers. I think Jen and Courtney were lovers too, and the reason you don’t see them together anymore is because Jen has hooked up with Chelsea Handler.
But that’s just my opinion.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Oh God!
This wedding is STILL pending? I had 2 weeks break and hoped for developement there.
I begin to think that Aniston feels perhaps happier “engaged” than “married”
Report this comment as spam or abuse
How old is CH again?
In the first pic her hand looks like she not only does the washing-up but also the laundry by hand.
And it’s been said before but with friends like CH JA doesn’t need enemies.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
She is so gross. She has nothing of value to contribute. I would love to read (not really, but it would be a nice change) an interview where she didn’t evoke the never ending triangle. Ugh. If being a mean girl gets you invited to the wedding then I guess it was worth it right Chelsea? She is not funny, interesting or attractive. I don’t get why she is popular. If I were Justin I’d be pissed my fiancé’s friend was making media rounds sh!t talking her ex. Makes Jen look like she is not over it and is only getting married as a way to compete with Brad/Angie. I wish she’d just disappear.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
The only way for her to stay relevant is to continuously talk about Jennifer Aniston or Angelina Jolie, so I guess she will continue with that for many years to come.Girl can’t be more interesting that that.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
she is like the female Arsenio Hall!!!
remember back in the day how he would name-drop Eddie Murphy’s name until your ears bled???
same f*cking thing here.
you have a famous bff, great.
you’re gettin’ it in with Uma’s billionaire sloppy seconds, great!
now stfd & stfu.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I do remember that now and thanks for reminding me–that is exactly why this seems to have bugged me for much longer than it’s been happening. Already went through it with Arsenio AND Joe Piscopo about Eddie Murphy.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
that pic of those 2 looks like 2 washed up, bleached out, overtanned old ladies.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
I think that Chelsea’s reward is lots and lots of media coverage! She found a hot button, Jolie, and she continues to successfully push it. Just look at this and previous threads.
Report this comment as spam or abuse
Who cares about either of them? I can’t stand either one! Be rude, nasty, self-absorbed & throw all the money u have anywhere. It will never change either of u bitches! Join the K Klan & fall off the face of the earth! One way ticket!!!!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
god it’s been over a decade….personally, i cannot stomach pitt, jolie or anniston because of how overhyped, overplayed, over=pressed their whole g damn debacle went down.
i myself have a hard time forgiving a boyfriend for cheating/douchery but Jaysus….I KNow i’d be well overit in a FREAKING dECADE!!!!!!!
Report this comment as spam or abuse
CH is morphing into a professional mouthpiece for JA, it’s very single white female
Report this comment as spam or abuse