Paris Hilton criticized by Australian press for shopping too much

fp_1770581_icon_hilton_pari
Paris Hilton is in Australia for a paid appearance for New Year’s Eve. While visiting the continent she’s doing what she does best – shopping. Instead of accepting that shopping is an inevitable part of Paris’ life/media cycle – she shows up to promote stuff, makes money and then spends it – the Australian press is pointing out all the charities she could have supported with the coin she dropped in less than an hour. That’s about as foreign to Paris as suggesting she would have better spent the time educating herself.

The hotel heiress arrived yesterday morning and wasted little time before hitting the upmarket Wayne Cooper boutique in South Yarra, where she spent $5560 in 40 minutes.

World Vision Australia chief Tim Costello said Hilton’s spree would have been enough to feed a Third World village.

“In World Vision terms, $5000 would ensure that a village of 2000 people in Africa or Asia would have clean water for the rest of their lives,” Mr Costello said.

Open Family social worker Les Twentyman said Hilton’s spree was disgraceful.

“It is quite obscene spending money like that. Some people are homeless and thousands of people a week are losing their jobs and it is quite obscene in some ways,” Mr Twentyman said.

As they hit out, Melbourne’s retailers and hospitality industry bent over backwards trying to meet her demands.

[From News.com.au via E! Online]

Remember when Paris went on Larry King after she got out of jail a year and a half ago and told him she was going to work with charities and stuff now that she was a changed person? Paris told King that children, breast cancer, and multiple sclerosis were the charities she was interested in supporting. She did appear in those weird nude ads for a water campaign started by a corporation and she showed up to some charity events. She even donated to a children’s hospital this summer. Paris has made some strides in the charity department, but she still doesn’t come close to rivaling her former BFF Nicole Richie, who started her own foundation. Maybe Paris will take some time off shopping to start thinking harder about how to help others instead of pondering which flashy dresses look best on her rail thin frame. She’s still got a few hours left to take advantage of the tax benefits for 2008.

Update: Paris has issued a response to the criticism of her shopping:

“I’m in Australia, I think it’s important to help out, you know, the economy out here, everywhere in the world … And what’s wrong with doing a little shopping? It’s New Year’s, I need a New Year’s dress.” [via Evil Beet]

Here’s Paris on 12/31 in Sydney at a Bongo event. Credit: Icon/Fame Pictures

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

13 Responses to “Paris Hilton criticized by Australian press for shopping too much”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. boomchakaboom says:

    I’m kinda falling in love with Australia. We never met but it’s totally pulling all the right strings. It noticed P’s fat wallet yet held out for some real substance, which of course didn’t come. Yes, I’m falling hard.

  2. elisha says:

    It’s her money. I’m not sure if Australia has sales tax, but if they do, they should be THANKING her for stimulating their economy.

    My California city is cancelling several homeless services and some other social services they provide because they’re facing a record budget deficit. The mayor is begging people to get out and spend in the city, and they’re launching campaigns to get people from elsewhere in the region to come shop here. Come spend your money in MY city/county, Paris! We’ll take it!

    **edit** Awesome!!! I just clicked over to the source website, intending to post pretty much the same comment, and right now most of their Ozzie commentors are saying the same thing as me. I love Oz!

  3. barneslr says:

    Who cares? Her money. If people are willing to pay her for being the brainless wonder that she is, then why shouldn’t she spend it as she sees fit?

  4. bros says:

    did you mean Aussie?

    that is such an ugly purse she is carrying. disgraceful that it has her name plastered all over it.

  5. Baholicious says:

    And nobody’s criticizing her for the atrocious haircolour? Looks like a brunette-to-blond home job.

  6. yadira says:

    The thing is that she is immature for her age. She is almost in her 30s and speaks and acts like a 18 yr old. It’s her money but she should’ve kept her mouth quiet when she was crying straight out of jail about how many good things she was going to do and how changed she was. It became expected of her but she is still the same selfish and ridiculous “heiress”.

    I prefer Nicole Richie, at least she seems to have grown up and realized there are more important things in life than a cute outfit

  7. elisha says:

    Are you talking to me, bros? “Oz” is slang for Australia, so, no, I didn’t mean “Aussie”. (FYI, do not EVER call an “Ozzie” an “Aussie” to their face! Not the ones I’ve met and worked with throughout my life, anyway. It’s like calling California “Cali” ::cringe::)

  8. Miranda says:

    I am pretty sure Australia has a sales tax, so she probably did just give the economy a boost, however mild. I think it’s funny because she didn’t spend that much. People in the US go shopping for Vera Wang originals and whatnot, and they spend far more than that (in sometimes even shorter amounts of time). I think that if Paris really wants to help the economy, she should come to NYC to do her shopping. It would probably save me from having to buy a $105 a month MetroCard.

  9. Tess says:

    Fish swim. Bunnies hop. Paris shops.

    What an outrage.

    Thank goodness we have “journalists” to investigate stories like this.

  10. RandomLurker says:

    Thing is, I live in Melbourne, and both Les Twentyman and Tim Costello play the ‘Media game’ as much as Paris does. Don’t get me wrong, it’s all to benefit people who really need the help, so they’re light years ahead of Paris in that regard.
    But they know that if they give a soundbite to some reporter with a grudge, thereby validating that reporter’s slant (ie ‘Paris is a selfish money-spender, and see! Head of World Vision agrees with me!’) then, when they have a fundraiser that needs promoting, that reporter will write a piece on it. That’s what’s happened here, I reckon.

    Oh, and Elisha, I think it’s entirely personal preference regarding ‘Ozzie’ or ‘Aussie’. I prefer ‘Aussie’, but that’s because I’m old enough to remember a variety show on TV that had a giant pink Ostrich puppet called ‘Ozzie’! Among ourselves, we’ll happily call each other Aussie, but I think it’s one of those in-jokes, only acceptable when it’s said by somebody who’s also that way.

  11. Kylie says:

    For the record – its Aussie not Ozzie.
    Oz = Wizard of Oz or Ozzie Ostrich.
    We are a pretty laid back lot over here. It would take more than calling us an Aussie to offend us!

    Haven’t you heard the old Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi at the Olympics?

  12. santacruz says:

    Why does this vacuous woman get so much press…I don’t get it!

  13. Danielle says:

    It is in fact “Aussie”. As I am an Australian, I should probably know. And.. i agree, takes a hell of a lot more to upset us then calling us Aussie. lol. I actaully think its kind of cool.

    And.. uh about this story. Get over it. We have sales tax. She earns her own money and therefore she has the right to spend it however she likes.