Comments on: Naveen Andrews of Lost gets full custody of son after courtroom drama

By: Marie Zyski

Marie Zyski — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:41:14 +0000

Lets be clear, the child is in a very loving home and florishing because he is with the parent who does not use the child as a source of income or a shortcut to fame.

The child is with the parent who did NOT sell their pathetic pack of lies the the National Enquire posing pregnant with this mournful look, claiming that she was told that he had left Barbara Hershey and also claiming that she was on the pill.

Yet Eustache became pregnant one month after the Golden Globes that Naveen was nominated for an award for, and was with Barbara, which Eustache had to see, there are pictures of her posing with the Lost cast at the Golden Globes. She knew EXACTLY what she was doing, purposely bringing an innocent child into this world for the sole purpose of obligating a celebrity to further her own career.

She had the baby(I am talking 18- 19 mos old) listed as an “actor” in an independent movie she is working on as a PA and bit part. She even set the baby up with his own IMDB page until she was caught and it was removed, along with the pictures of him and the part listing in the movie and the pictures of her and the baby on her own sad little IMDB.

Obviously she resents that a celebrity stawker expert was hired to be the court ordered monitor. Eustache was also assured in court that she would not have to pay any more than the standard $100 to $150 per hour for the monitor.

And if she has a problem with Naveen working in Hawaii, then maybe she should have targeted a more convenient celebrity, because that is where they had there “hook-ups” according to her own words in the National Enquirer, so why the all the squawking now about Hawaii?

And as for changing the childs name, face it, she was exploiting Naveen’s name when she named the child Naveen Joshua simply so that his IMDB page would appear whenever Naveen Andrews’ fans looked him up on IMDB.

For someone who is a supposedly expert in 19 lauguages, her gutter lifestyle is so coarse. To cry poor mouth with the knowledge of 19 languages? She should be making a much more stable and lucritive career than bit parts and PA’s on independent movies.

With her real name and prior past job history she should have used those 3 years she had custodial custody as a gift and a chance of redemption instead of exploiting a child and trying to keep a loving father from his son.

Those are NOT the actions of a loving wonderful mother. In ANY book. Those are the actions of someone unstable, or of a cold, calculating manipulator, either way, COMPLETE unsuitable to raise a child.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Alan Brook

Alan Brook — Mon, 25 May 2009 17:28:07 +0000

Naveen Andrews steals the child from Elena Eustache and now he is selling her baby to her! The poor mother has no money to see her son, because she has to pay $ 300 each visit of 3 hours with her son. He wants to sell her child for $ almost 4000 for 36 hours with her own son,Andrews hired together with Hershey Devil Laura Wasser with her scene crime partner judge buddy Elizabeth Feffer to steal the baby from Elena and order her silence for 15 years. The baby is away from his mother for 5 month already raised by lunatic Barbara Hershey , who change his name from Naveen to Joshua, like she has a history in changing names. The child and the mother is broken hearted . Please someone help!!!! This is terrible.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: MOTHERSRGREAT1

MOTHERSRGREAT1 — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:05:39 +0000

WOW, WOW, WOW People who posted so many negative comments have either (A) never been in a custody dispute or (B) are Pro Father’s Rights. Attorney’s can make anything look very bad for a mother who is trying to obtain custody of her child. Elena, is a mother.. period!! and if she was crying outside of the court, that doesn’t mean she does that in front of her son. What is wrong with everyone assuming that the father is some great man who did nothing wrong. I call B.S. on that, because if he was so great then he would have never tried to gain full custody of his child only Joint. There are so many resources out there to help families who are divorced and sharing custody to help deal with the visitation and separation of the children. He didn’t take any action for his child to feel more comfortable during this hard time and he is a Cheater, which means he doesn’t have any family values and if he cheated on his wife, what makes you think he is not cheating his son from having a comfortable relationship with his mother? Just because people separate it doesn’t mean they get to control a child, who will one day grow up and become an adult himself. What example is he showing his son? He is saying if you want something right or wrong then just make sure you have enough money, know the right people, and never let the other person who you cared about win??? WRONG on his part. So what did the court teach us with this case? It taught us that no matter where the child is placed the child will be motherless or fatherless, not what’s best for the child or to protect the child from feeling abandoned by his mother. Money, Power, and popularity will always play a huge factor in determining who gets custody of children. The sad part is that Elena was probably informed of these Witchcraft things by her ex. Who knows how she got her information and she probably thought by telling the court she would protect her son. It may sound like I am siding with her, but here’s the deal they both have a responsibility to their child. I’m sure that the lawyer he hired to take his case is very smart and knows what buttons to press in order for the custody case to be a positive outcome for the clients they represent. PLEASE STOP JUDGING MOTHER’S. IT’S NOT FAIR TO ANY MOTHER TO HEAR CRUEL AND FALSE THINGS ABOUT HER. You people are all wrong and I am here to say BEWARE, If you plan on having children in the near future make sure it’s with someone you want to spend the rest of your life with or else you can be a victim of this kind of COURT GAME. Mother’s are loosing custody of there children for even sneezing he was a bad husband and father. The Father’s Right’s Movement needs to be stopped in there tracks as they are flooding the courts with money and lies about mother’s and the lawyer’s that are involved in getting the baby stealing in action are all sneaky, want to win and know what to do and say to get father’s custody. Mother’s who are divorcing with children Please Read PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME OR PAS. It is all about gaining custody for Father’s. The Family Courts needs to Stop allowing this nonsense to continue in their court rooms. Mother’s protect yourselves, the lawyer’s are out their to steal your kids and so is CPS OR DHS, They are ready and willing to do whatever it takes to get paid…THIS MADDNESS NEEDS TO STOP!!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kristen

Kristen — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:26:44 +0000

Didn’t he cheat on Hershey with this woman who is the mother of his child?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: FamilyFriend

FamilyFriend — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:57:00 +0000

It’s a shame that so many morons here like “ronnie” condemn Elena without knowing her. She’s an extremely intelligent and thoughtful person. She speaks 19 languages and was kind enough to tutor me in one of them. I’ve spent time with both her and little Naveen and was always VERY impressed at how good a mother Elena is. In fact, I’ve commented to mutual friends that I consider Elena the perfect mother. Yes, Naveen was cheating on Barbara with Elena and yes Barbara is resentful and vindictive. She’s a danger to little Naveen and it’s a shame the judge didn’t consider that. And, btw, yes Elena took her son out of the county, just across the county line to a nearby lake! How can that warrant taking him away!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: aleach

aleach — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:34:53 +0000

barbra looks like a HOT mess.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Ally

Ally — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:29:54 +0000

It seems glaringly unfair that she loses custody cause she took the kid out of the county, but now he gets to take the child to Hawaii? Yup, money talks.

As someone pointed out on Defamer, Andrews has been with Hershey for more than 3 years; so this child is the product of cheating. Classy.

On a random note, I remember reading somewhere that Hershey changed her name to Barbara Seagull in the seventies… some hippie, Jonathan the, Chekhov thing I guess. So I don’t know that accusations of some hippified witchcraft (I have nothing but respect for hippies, mind you) call for psychiatric evaluation of the birth mother.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Lila

Lila — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:43:54 +0000

wow: that impresses me that he’s with an older woman, even if she is unrecognizable.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: DC

DC — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:13:38 +0000

It’s against child custody laws in most states to remove the child from the county of residence without the permission of a co-parent. She forfeited her rights as a parent when she did that.

Yes, in many places money talks, but there’s absolutely no way to know if it played a hand in this case. The fact that she removed the child from the county alone justifies the decision legally.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: LondonParis

LondonParis — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:52:22 +0000

Money and fame absolutely hold ultimate sway in court. However, I think Britney showed us that no matter how much money and fame is involved, if a court sees that a parent is mentally unstable and possibly a harm to the child, the more stable parent will get them. Which is to say, money and fame don’t always get the day… (though Brit was paying for Federline’s fees too… hmm.)

If this woman is claiming that Andrews is POISONING their child, who’s to say that SHE wouldn’t ACTUALLY poison him in an attempt to prove this accusation? That is the danger with mentally unstable people- there is NO WAY to determine of guess what they will do next, because it doesn’t follow the path of logic and reason.
Money may have had something to do with this, but I don’t see anything wrong with the verdict.

Report this comment as spam or abuse