Don’t we already know since the ’60s that most humans are neither 100% “gay” nor 100%”straight”? It is just a choice to think that one is 100% this or that. What is it that causes people never to change the way they view other people? What makes sex so “special”?

We progress in a technological-materialistic sense but thought processes rarely ever progress.

Having a “happy” life is just an idea and a choice that is up to you, irrespective of whether or not other people (dis)approve of your existence.

Why would you allow for your well-being to depend on other people’s opinions, by the way?

What is the purpose of being “openly” “gay”? Is “openly” better? Why do people think that humans need to be categorised as either “straight” or “gay”? How relevant is that, really?

Do you really need to imitate everything that is being done by the “normal” dominant majority?

I think it is merely a fantasy that copying the behaviour of the dominant majority is the only option that will ultimately lead to “happiness”.

What is “happiness” anyway? It is only a culturally determined concept and obviously some people think they need to pursue whatever is “popular”.

“If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.”

–> this is funny. Apparently it is very common in your society for other to wish you were dead. Welcome to the country of freedom for everyone .

–> no second chances? That’s rather harsh and intolerant, isn’t it? If you present yourselves as religious or open-minded, one might expect some sense of forgiveness .

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Sodomy laws in the United States (laws primarily intended to outlaw gay sex) have been invalidated by the 2003 Supreme Court decision Lawrence v. Texas. While they were originally intended to outlaw sex acts between homosexuals, many definitions were broad enough to make certain heterosexual acts illegal as well.

When Prop. 8 is overturned (which it will… LoL), clergy or church/synagogue/mosque/temples will not be forced to perform gay & lesbian marriages. If they don’t believe it in, there will be no law forcing them to. They might get some heat for not doing them, but by no means will they be forced to do so. Just as we should have the right to marry whomever we choose, they should have the right to their belief’s and not be forced to do anything against their beliefs.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

If only I were straight.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Homosexuality is condemned by the major religions and so any sense of a right or entitlement to a religious marriage service that some gay people want is unreasonable and no clergy or church/synagogue/mosque/emple should be made to go against their faith in performing it.

That being said, legal marriage should be extended to homosexual couples. They have every right to have their unions recognized and respected as well as other benefits and security that legal marriage provides.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Between 1913 – 1948, 30 US states passed laws stating that interracial sex & marriage were LEGAL.

In 1967, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that miscegenation laws (banning interracial sex & marriage) are unconstitutional. With this ruling, the remaining states changes their laws. (There were only 48 states at that time)

In 1998, South Carolina officially removed the ban from their books, even though they didn’t actively enforce it.

In 2000, Alabama officially removed the ban from their books, even though they didn’t actively enforce it.

So basically, as of today, it’s totally LEGAL in ALL 50 States to have interracial sex & marriage.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse

HAHA Kaiser, that totally made me laugh LOL

I admit I used to think this guy was just a shallow beefcake type (he used to date Jessica Biel, not a ringing endorsement if you ask me LOL) but then a couple of years ago I read up on him a bit, and everything I read changed my mind. Seems like a decent guy. And good on him for supporting such an important cause. :0)

Report this comment as spam or abuse

I don’t understand the silly judgement in the first paragraphs, just because he is good looking.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

Report this comment as spam or abuse