Comments on: Anne Hathaway pays for everything with new boyfriend

By: malivich

malivich — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:56:31 +0000

Anne, the problem with being the crown princess is there is only one step up {Queen} and a very long way down. So if you don’t have your eye on being Cleopatra, you have a long swim down the river de-nile.
Anne’s new money, so the old money tolerates her, as a novelty, a new toy to be played with, but with respect no. But the smell of freshly minted money draws the hound to bay {boy that sure sounds nice wonder what it means}.
Every heiress hunter smells the green and they all are consummate actors in the pretense of love. Since Anne limits herself to her tight cliche of intimate friends, they are all finding the perfect match for her, in the spend now save later crowd.
What Anne really needs is someone more mature, more cautious, and can not act like a lover; only be her lover.
Of course I have my own canidate, Annie just don’t call me “Grandad”.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: sissoucat

sissoucat — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:13:39 +0000

Her eyes are too big and dropping. First time ever I find an American Actress unattractive.. Well, good for her to succeed despite her looks !

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: tigerlille

tigerlille — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:46:02 +0000

I obviously have a difference of opinion with the people who think that Anne Hathaway was cognizant of her former boyfriend’s criminal activities. There is nothing to be gained by continuing to discuss the matter, but I would like to make a few final points.

Anne Hathaway is an wealthy young woman who can afford to buy herself any luxuries she wants. I find it odd that anyone would assume that the basis of her attraction to Follieri was the gifts and vacations that he gave her. I am not aware of anything known to the public that would suggest that Anne is shallow and materialistic.

When all is said and done, all the assumptions and character traits that are attributed to Anne are pure speculation. None of us actually know her. It is beyond me why people choose to be cruel and judgemental rather than kind or compassionate, or to assume the worst of this talented young woman. Anne has made a remarkably successful transition from princess-themed movies for children to adult roles, while also managing to complete her college degree from reputable universities, and she has done it with grace.

Follieri was working his cons long before he met Anne. Yes, his relationship with her did seem to help him gain credibility with some, and yes I am sure that he took advantage of his relationship with her to network, which is a pretty widespread business practise.

I think that some of you are a little naive about how sociopathic liars operate, and underestimate their amazing ability to lead double lives. In the course of my career I encountered and worked with men who lied without conscience. Just about anyone is susceptible to deception at the hands of these people. My God, Follieri did business with former President Bill Clinton. And Anne Hathaway, a young actress who was in love with the man, should have known better? Ridiculous.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: vdantev

vdantev — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:10:02 +0000

Love the dress.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: MT

MT — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:19:58 +0000

Kaiser I totally agree with you.

She enjoyed him spending a lot of money on her, while all that time she interduced him to people (some of them he conned.

she helped him gain credibility in the USA, and got him involved in one of the charities she had contact with (which he conned too).

She certainly was shallow and greedy to be attracted to his extravagnt gifts, and luxuries he offered her.

I do think they should have checked her involvement with his deeds.
Nobody knew who he was in the states, until she started to interduce him to people.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: kate

kate — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:00:25 +0000

god, she bores me.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: tigerlille

tigerlille — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:04:17 +0000

I think that the FBI would have been happy to indict a Hollywood actress if there had been any basis for doing so. I don’t know what she told the FBI, but the fact that she cooperated with them does not make her guilty of anything. Are you suggesting that she gave them evidence in exchange for their not prosecuting her? That’s a pretty big leap. Follieri is the son of a con artist, and he fooled a lot of extremely wealthy people. I can’t see holding his girlfriend the actress to a higher standard than his investors. She is just another victim. Although I must say, that if I were her, I would have started asking a lot of hard questions the day John McCain showed up at the yacht.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Kaiser

Kaiser — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:21:33 +0000

Tiger - Follieri was being investigated and probed for months before the hammer came down, and the whole time Anne was defending him, and continuing to live on the largesse of a con artist. So, the argument is “poor Anne, she trusted him!” Bullsh-t. As soon as she couldn’t get anything else out of the relationship, and saw the danger for HER, she turned state’s evidence. And what do you think she told the FBI? If she was so oblivious to his crimes?

Look… I don’t really care that much about her, but it pisses me off when there’s a double standard. If she wasn’t “poor little Anne” the famous actress, she might be under indictment.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Jane

Jane — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:32:53 +0000

“Are you a man?” Priceless!!

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: lodongs

lodongs — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:19:04 +0000

Why does it look like she’s rocking some treacher collins in the occasional picture?

Report this comment as spam or abuse