Comments on: Britney’s Speculative Non-Lipo

By: Cha Cha Loca

Cha Cha Loca — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:11:16 +0000

Does it matter what her body looks like if she’s always going to be dressed in those hideously ugly, ill fitting clothes???!!! And the stupid wig/hat thing is just killing me.

If the Laker dude starts dating her he is even more retarded than she is. He needs to run for the hills.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: van

van — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:39:36 +0000

Those boots!!! Doesn’t this woman have any other shoes?? They must smell like death by now.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: Iva

Iva — Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:29:16 +0000

You are correct when you say Britney is still seeking attention…too bad she doesn’t seek that attention with her children.

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: gg

gg — Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:25:36 +0000

And when you’re in your 20s like Britney, should never even be considered. She could easily lose any fat (which I have yet to see) in the gym. After seeing Courtney Love and Tara Reeds’ scaryass stomachs, I’d NEVER consider it. Who wants to have a perpetually lumpy stomach?

Report this comment as spam or abuse

By: jenny

jenny — Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:58:48 +0000

i’ve had lipo, but not the new lipo dissolve thing. you shouldn’t lipo fat that can be melted away at the gym– lipo is meant for stubborn areas that never seem to go away, no matter how much you work out. for instance, although nicole richie is skiiiny, her tummy is still flabby. same with ashlee simpson, thus they would be ideal candidates for stomach/flank lipo. yes it hurts like a $%^7& but those fat cells never return, so it’s worth it. working out at the gym isn’t really an alternative to lipo, you’re supposed to be at a good weight before having lipo done in the 1st place. but yeah, it HURT

Report this comment as spam or abuse